That's what they said when he predicted that Washington and Jefferson would be next after Confederate statues were toppled, and he was right. It's even spread to Francis Scott Key, Cervantes, abolitionists like Hans Christian Heg, the all black Civil War 54th Massachusetts Regiment, U.S. Grant, Churchill, Ghandi, and Abe Lincoln. Who would have thought anyone other than white supremacists would want to tear down the Emancipation Memorial?

Former New York Daily News columnist Shaun King (aka Talcum X) has already called for it. A Black Madonna has been defaced in the Netherlands, and a Virgin Mary statue was set on fire in Boston. Note that King said nothing about them being outside church grounds. St. John's Episcopal Church in DC was burned and defaced. Your last sentence seems to be setting the ground for the Law of Merited Impossibility: It'll never happen, and when it does, you'll deserve it.

As someone has posted, Black Lives Matter is a political organization with specific leftist goals. Their website lists them as bringing down capitalism and the nuclear family. One of its co-founders proudly confirmed: "We are trained Marxists." They don't even care about all Black lives, considered how their supporters shot and killed two unarmed Black teenagers in Seattle and an eight-year old Black girl in Atlanta.

I agree Trump's hands aren't clean.  But any acts of corruption he's been accused of as the President hadn't happened yet.  So in 2012 we would have been comparing Trump's conduct as a member of the private sector to the Clintons' history of political corruption and abuse of power. 

Not only was Clinton more corrupt (IMO), but the type of corruption she had engaged in was more relevant to the question of suitability to serve as POTUS 

I believe that when Trump mentioned statues of Jesus being targeted next, he was specifically referring to comments being made by Shaun King. 

King is the founder of the Real Justice PAC, a prominent civil rights activist, and vocal supporter of BLM (the political organization as well as the movement).

King has said "I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down.  They are a form of white supremacy.  Always have been.  In the Bible, when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went?  EGYPT!  Not Denmark.  Tear them down."  

Also: "All murals and stained glass windows of white Jesus, and his European mother, and their white friends should also come down.  They are a gross form of white supremacy.  Created as tools of oppression.  Racist propaganda. They should all come down."

So just:

- Discriminating against black rent applicants

- Using his charitable foundation to self-deal

- A history of not paying contractors and workers

- Establishing a fraudulent university

- Rumored Mafia ties

For the people that wanted a businessman in office because they thought America should be run like a business, I guess they got what they wanted.

I don't find this idea that radical.

What doesn't have merit is the notion that people who share King's views can justifiably tear down statues that belong to other people with different views about Jesus.

If King was directing his remarks towards white churches and advocating that they taken down the statues themselves, I would have no problem with his remarks.  

But King was tweeting in support of protestors tearing down statues in the middle of the night, and suggesting those groups should begin targeting Christian churches.