Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 13 Next >>
Topic: Impeachment? Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4540
Posted: 29 May 2019 at 4:49pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

I thought only one house was tasked with impeaching, that it doesn't need both, doesn't involve both. I would like to know who would vote for a Democrat who had enough to impeach but who wouldn't? If voters would penalize Democrats for holding a president to account on multiple serious matters then so be it, let's just go entirely down that toilet thanks to a bunch of reactionary bigots for a fraud artist and his foreign fascist enemy pals if they have so much power. Nothing conservative about any of them.

Also, the one who brings up IQ and intelligence thew most is the stinking head of the rotting fish yet again, el Trumpo, and what do we know that says about someone who does that? Weaknesses galore and yet people act like they are vastly outnumbered by fools and the fooled? Just a big front like any con man wants to put up, you make it work for him by buying into it.


Edited by Rebecca Jansen on 29 May 2019 at 4:50pm
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6106
Posted: 29 May 2019 at 5:35pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Rebecca: I thought only one house was tasked with impeaching, that it doesn't
need both, doesn't involve both.

**

You are mistaken, the process of impeachment begins in the House and ends
in the Senate. First the House conducts an investigation and votes on
impeachment. If it goes forward, reps from the House act as prosecutor for a
trial in the Senate. Then, there's a Senate deliberation and a final result which
can be removal from office.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 29 May 2019 at 5:40pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

"The final Senate vote on impeachment will be an acquittal and the resulting news coverage will depress the Democratic turnout."

Only in part. The outcome is already decided, so yes, the resulting news coverage will depress voter turnout, but that's not the entirety of it.

The entire process will be long and futile. Not just ultimately futile, but futile throughout. Nothing will come of it except Democratic losses since nothing surprising about this creep can be said at this point. It will drag down American morale every step of the way, to no good end. It would likely result in a miserable stretch of months, filled with bad guys saying they're winning, good guys saying "We don't have anything yet..." and news reporters saying, "Everything's undecided. But yes, the Democrats are correct. They have nothing as of yet." 

The Democrats need something more than what they have. You could argue that is what the impeachment process will net them (and us) eventually, but absent any clear indication of a bunny at the bottom of the bowl, there is no reason to down this particularly bitter serving of mush.


Edited by Brian Hague on 29 May 2019 at 5:41pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4540
Posted: 29 May 2019 at 6:42pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

If it comes down to the Senate then I guess you can expect the majority of Republicans to protect 'their' president (unlike when it was Nixon being investigated). :^(

I said a few weeks ago that if the entry wound has caused as much damage as it has what might the exit be like? Very messy. :^(
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6106
Posted: 29 May 2019 at 6:44pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Brian: The entire process will be long and futile. Not just ultimately futile,
but futile throughout. Nothing will come of it except Democratic losses
since nothing surprising about this creep can be said at this point. It will
drag down American morale every step of the way, to no good end.

**
Have you read the Mueller report?

97% of America has not. The amount of detail of Trump and his team's
specific unethical and illegal behavior in there is astounding. That's the
redacted version.

With impeachment, the un-redacted version can be subpoenaed.

The notion that this will not surprise a vast portion of America is
unsupportable.

But I am grateful for at least a theory of why impeachment could be bad for
the Democrats. Public hearings, over-determined by GOP partisanship fired
up the "Blue Wave" of 2018. So it is hardly a given that more hearings like
that would actually depress turnout. Injustice like acquitting an obviously
guilty Supreme Court nominee or President has a way of making voters
angry-- and angry voters tend to vote.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 29 May 2019 at 11:47pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

I'd like to be able to share your optimism on that, but the Mueller Report at this point contains no smoking gun and no one, no one is talking about how "obviously guilty" frat-boy Kavanaugh is. He skated completely as far as I can tell. I wish I could believe the American voter has a long enough memory to make your scenario work, but they pretty much don't. A significant number of voters went into the polls thinking only of the then-released James Comey statement about Hillary Clinton ringing in their short-term recall. 

You're banking on those redacted reveals in the Mueller Report being A.) Breathtaking and B.) Something that can actually be used in a public proceeding. That's a big risk, and again, the report could definitively prove Trump is a serial killing child rapist and Vladimir Putin's intel-leaking love slave and our Republican representatives in the Senate would still clear him, trumpeting his innocence to the heavens. Wal-Mart wouldn't be able to stock enough tiki torches for everyone in his Deep South victory parade.

And U.S. voters in general would only vote Trump out for such crimes if the news broke within 72 hours of their trip to the polls. Otherwise, their minds would be off that and onto whatever streaming show had the biggest, bloodthirstiest finale that week. "Yeah, I heard something about him doing clown paintings and burying the kids in the Rose Garden, but who can keep any of that political stuff straight these days? Did you see everyone in Asia get turned inside out on Game of Breaking Mirrors last night?" 

I want to believe better of the political process and the people of this country. I'd enjoy life more if I could. They've shown me however that they are not to be relied upon, either of them.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Koroush Ghazi
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 October 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1652
Posted: 30 May 2019 at 2:07am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

 Mark Haslett wrote:
The notion that this will not surprise a vast portion of America is unsupportable.


It would only surprise them if they believed the sources through which they would read about the full report. Remember, Fox, Breitbart, InfoWars et al. will skew virtually anything said about Trump to make it sound positive, and every other news outlet will be considered to be fake news by the Trumpanzees, so don't expect surprise so much as outrage at "yet another attack on the President".
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8040
Posted: 30 May 2019 at 7:47am | IP Logged | 8 post reply

"And U.S. voters in general would only vote Trump out for such crimes if the news broke within 72 hours of their trip to the polls. Otherwise, their minds would be off that and onto whatever streaming show had the biggest, bloodthirstiest finale that week. "

---

This. Trump is but a symptom of what ails society today, not the cause. Brexit happened independently of Trump, for example. If the Democrats want to win, they need to address this, instead. So far the 20+ Democrats seems to be running on an "I'm not Trump" platform. Unseating an incumbent President is NOT easy, and in the past that involve people voting FOR a new candidate instead of just voting AGAINST the previous one.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 30901
Posted: 30 May 2019 at 8:24am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Our President:

“I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 15810
Posted: 30 May 2019 at 10:05am | IP Logged | 10 post reply

Sadly, that's about right, Brian.

Mueller: "The central allegation of our indictments [are] that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election." This 'concerted attack', as Mueller describes it, was launched by Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military.

But it's a witchhunt, right?

Putting aside questions of whether Trump was involved or not, of how much he knew about what was going on, it's mind boggling that his attitude to an attack on US democracy has been that it shouldn't be investigated and as long as no-one is blaming him, everything is A-OK.

Edited to correct a typo


Edited by Peter Martin on 30 May 2019 at 12:01pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 30901
Posted: 30 May 2019 at 10:17am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

God, what a baby. 



Edited by Brian Miller on 30 May 2019 at 10:19am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Ladd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4506
Posted: 30 May 2019 at 10:25am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Just contemplate how hard you have to work in order to reconcile the two positions:

This was a witch hunt to uncover the multiple, systematic and concerted efforts to attack the US Presidential election process by Russian Intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military?

Look for the new legal defense of "ignorant guilt" in a courtroom year you.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 13 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login