Who is talking about a grand conspiracy, Matt?

When the initial news came out with little detail, some of us here expressed some suspicions that it might be fake. As more information dripped out (increasingly credible), those suspicions faded, particularly when Marc and Brian mentioned in the previous page about Brevoort and Salicrup.

Subsequent to that information, we have a discussion about quirks in the piece that raise some questions. I don't think anyone at any point talked about anyone having conspired with anyone.

Naturally, #137 is an issue in which many here have a keen interest.  Confirmation that the piece is genuine is hardly a case of "Nuff said". On the contrary, a revelation that this heretofore unknown item exists  is naturally a springing board for further questions.

Brevoort surmises that it was either Jim Salicrup or Weezie that made the decision to go with a new version. I, for one, would be interested to hear what their reminscences are regarding this piece.