Author |
|
Koroush Ghazi Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 25 October 2009 Location: Australia Posts: 1686
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 1:52pm | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
John Byrne wrote:
As Neal Adams said, there are no bad characters, only bad writers. |
|
|
Jar-jar Binks would disagree!
Edited by Koroush Ghazi on 04 March 2024 at 1:53pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133754
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 2:02pm | IP Logged | 2
|
post reply
|
|
It wasn’t Binks’ fault he was so badly written!Over the years there has been a recurring annoyance for me, in the form of fans who blame the characters for being poorly written. Sure, we’re supposed to ride along enjoying (or not) the characters as if they are real, but we need to remember they are not! It was a curious dichotomy, I thought, that some readers would invest so much in the characters, fully embracing them as if they were living, breathing human beings, and yet, when something bad happened to them, knowing who to blame!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Vinny Valenti Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 17 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 8180
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 2:06pm | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
"It wasn’t Binks’ fault he was so badly written!"
I was about to ask if you ever intentionally took on a "bad character" with the intent of reversing that, but then a glaring example flashed in my brain: The Sentinels. I guess Wolverine would count in a way, also. Looking back on pre-you issues lately, I can see why the creative team (and the readers) wanted him gone.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133754
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 2:11pm | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
It was Chris who insisted the Sentinels were lame, and we know what that led to!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
James Woodcock Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 21 September 2007 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 7914
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 2:43pm | IP Logged | 5
|
post reply
|
|
Jar Jar's execution on screen was poor. But I maintain that the purpose of the character was to create someone who was annoying to adults, but that kids would love. I also think that he was clearly to be annoying to the characters in the film. In that, the character was a success. But we digress.
Edited by James Woodcock on 04 March 2024 at 2:44pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133754
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 3:34pm | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
Yes, Jar Jar was meant to be annoying. I just don’t think Lucas realized how successful he was going to be!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Rebecca Jansen Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 12 February 2018 Location: Canada Posts: 4635
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 4:56pm | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
QUOTE:
no bad characters, only bad writers |
|
|
I used to hate Moondragon, although I think I was meant to, but she became a more multi-faceted favorite in that 'New' Defenders comic that also had Iceman and Angel. There's a comic that sold me via the writing because the art was fairly average (excepting all the guest covers of which there were many). It's fairly common on the British soaps for a new character to be introduced for instant conflict of some sort and then if they stick around they begin to develop real depth to where they might become one of the more sympathetic ongoing residents. No idea if that happens on U.S. soaps much outside Dark Shadows where the vampire Barnabas was spectacularly popular on introduction and had to be kept around, thus becoming more a reluctant vampire (pure gold then and apparently with some still today).
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Craig Earl Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 13 July 2019 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 1430
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 5:55pm | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
I can still remember when Star Wars Episode 1 came out. UK Breakfast TV hailed Jar-Jar as the undeniable star of the movie.
Not being a massive Star Wars fan, I'm not sure when I first heard the swell of negative opinions. These days it seems like everyone refers to Jar-Jar as the lowest point.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Koroush Ghazi Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 25 October 2009 Location: Australia Posts: 1686
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 6:50pm | IP Logged | 9
|
post reply
|
|
I regret starting off a Binks thread drift; I was being facetious of course when referencing poor Jar-jar - Neal Adams’ statement is 100% correct. Most John Byrne fans would be familiar with the way JB’s history essentially proves this point again and again.
An example from my own experience was the inclusion of She-Hulk in the FF. I was not a happy camper when that happened, I can tell you! But i went from disliking her to buying and enjoying the She-Hulk graphic novel because of the depth JB gave the character.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133754
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 6:58pm | IP Logged | 10
|
post reply
|
|
Maximum kudos to Roger Stern for his simple but brilliant take on She-Hulk: she LIKES being She-Hulk!(And poop on later “talent” who made her lumpy and brutal. Hulk with boobs. Marvel: the House of Idea.)
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Michael Penn Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 12 April 2006 Location: United States Posts: 12805
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 8:08pm | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
I had unofficially quit reading comicbooks around the time JB first took over the FF. I hung around for a bit, the last issues I bought, just for JB's work. But losing the Thing from the team cemented my decision to drop the hobby altogether. Decades later... what a delight to discover what JB did with She-Hulk!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Ken Sun Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 29 October 2018 Location: Canada Posts: 99
|
Posted: 04 March 2024 at 10:22pm | IP Logged | 12
|
post reply
|
|
I liked JB's take on Namor the Sub Mariner. Can't wait for FF MCU to see a love triangle between him, Reed Richards for Sue. Imperius Rex!!!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|