Ah, your second paragraph broaches an important consideration for anyone who believes in the possibilty of discovering a moral order, and that is whether to bring it into the political order too. Politics concerns the art of governance, but such governance need not necessarily regulate every single aspect of the citizen's behaviour, only those things necessary for people to live together in a safe, healthy and free environment....

Stop. I just realised, thinking about this, one could write a book. Well, I'm already writing one book, that is, my thesis, so I haven't the time to write another. Instead I'm going to get some dinner!

This whole thread gives me the strongest feeling of deja vu...

Or have I said that already?

Besides, we're most agreed on the main point -- Wikipedia is
worthless as a datasource, given its nature.
*****

I understand that there is a likelyhood of inacuracies in Wikipedia and will certainly concede that.  I don't feel that stating its "worthess as a datasourse" is fair.  Collecting data to form information is something that individuals seem to take too lightly, but I can't blame Wikipedia for that.  Wikipedia is meant to be a tool, but who uses one single tool to get any job done?  Would you fix a car with nothing more than a screwdrive?  If you are collecting information, would you expect to find all the answers in a single website?  Growing up, I was taught in school that in order to write a paper, I had to have several sources researched and cited.  People need to realize they have a responsibility when collecting information, and that is to not blindly follow one single path, those that don't become the datasource that is worthless.