| Author |
|
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 1:54pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
"Perhaps if someone else would edit on JB's behalf maybe that'll work. I
suppose when JB tried to delete some of the entries, they saw this as
being bias as the entry was about him. I dunno. Just guessing."
Months ago I and a couple other guys tried to edit down the Wiki entry but were
stopped by an admin. He and other admins sided with those who wanted to
pack the article with rumors, hearsay from decades back. Of course,
those admins are themselves very opinionated comics fans. It was
incredibly frustrating.
Edited by Joe Zhang on 14 September 2005 at 1:55pm
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Chris Hutton
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 11667
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 1:57pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Lots of people on here rely on that site when making statements. To me, wikipedia is just like a blog-- anybody can write whatever they want, & it becomes "fact."
No thanks.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Todd Hembrough
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 4171
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:02pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
I have found it useful, to a point, for historical facts, and the
like. People, and countries, and dates, etc. JB's entry is
a travesty, and it may well be emblematic of the site as a whole.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Robotmod
Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36132
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:03pm | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
Anyplace that basically says to the general population "You're the
editor!" should be taken with a big ol' heaping helping of salt.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Jon Juzan
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 696
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:11pm | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Anyplace that basically says to the general population "You're the editor!" should be taken with a big ol' heaping helping of salt.
-------------------------------
Which is why it baffles me that JB wants to "fix" it. Even if he fixes it, then others can come back and changed what he changed!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:17pm | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
"Which is why it baffles me that JB wants to "fix" it. "
Problem is the presentation, the image of Wikipedia makes its contents
seem authoratitive. You wouldn't like it if someone made an entry that
alleges you are a cannabilstic cross-dresser, would you? But the
attitude of Wiki is such that if you can type it on a keyboard, then
its perfectly fit to print.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Glenn Brown
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3095
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:17pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
This doesn't help JB's question, but just wanted to add I don't think he has been singularly blocked from editing the entry bearing his name because of his celebrity. Apparently, several Internet users can share a common IP address (wasn't aware of this; is this only on AOL?), so everyone linked to that address will receive emails and messages from Wikipedia re "vandalism" of an entry and threats of being barred. This occurred with me, and I have never created an entry or edited a page...yet "I" received hostile emails for doing so.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Roger A Ott II
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5371
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:29pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Matt Reed: Anyplace that basically says to the general population "You're the editor!" should be taken with a big ol' heaping helping of salt.
Exactly. I've never gone there, and I see no need to. What good is the information there if I can't rely on it to be factual?
I'll stick to more reliable sources, thank you very much.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Jon Juzan
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 696
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:33pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Problem is the presentation, the image of Wikipedia makes its contents seem authoratitive. You wouldn't like it if someone made an entry that alleges you are a cannabilstic cross-dresser, would you? But the attitude of Wiki is such that if you can type it on a keyboard, then its perfectly fit to print.
---------------------------------------------------
No I wouldn't like it...but I would realize there's nothing I can do about it. And what exactly is authoratitive about the main page that says "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit"?
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Roger A Ott II
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5371
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:33pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
JB: Makes AOL seem like a bastion of sanity and decorum!
Now that's just crazy talk! I remember the old Byrne Ward days, and wow...what a load of fun that was...
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:49pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
"And what exactly is authoratitive about the main page that says "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit"?"
It's kind of like the problem with Rich Johnston's "column". Yes, he
clearly says he's not a journalist, but people take him seriously
because many of his rumors turn out to be true. So they overlook his
lies. Wikiepedia is doing a real disservice to JB, but otherwise they
seem to be quite informative.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Mark McConnell
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 573
|
| Posted: 14 September 2005 at 2:50pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Way too much opinion for an "encyclopedia" article.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Topic Closed)
