Posted: 23 May 2013 at 1:16pm | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
Likely some other toy manufacturer has "Puck" trademarked.•• With a pre-existing word, that would be hard to make a case for! ----- My understanding is that you can trademark a generic word if it is arbitrary to your product. So a fruit company probably couldn't trademark "apple", but Apple Computer can trademark "Apple" because people don't normally associate apples with computers. I know that Hasbro has issues with its Tranformers line, since many of the characters were given generic word names back in the 80s when they were less stringent about checking and maintaining copyrights. So the Transformers character "Jazz" can't be branded as "Jazz" and has been sold under a variety of other names like "Autobot Jazz" or "Meister" (the name used for the character in Japan. One of the amusing trademark issues I've seen was with Mattel's DC line, when they apparently couldn't use the name for the Infinity Inc character "Obsidian". So included among the wave of figures was Green Lantern, Hourman, Kamandi, Zatanna, and... Todd Rice.
|