Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 117 Next >>
Topic: Growing Roses and Meeting Deadlines (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jesus Garcia
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 April 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2414
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 1  

Two things which usually indicate the near end of a
discussion (1) mentioning Hitler or (2) invoking the
dictionnary.

Too bad. We had a little summer heat going on there.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Greer
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Posts: 14190
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 2  

Jesus Garcia, I don't now if that is a typo. But I don't like having my name being replaced with Trek Tart. It's bad enough I'm a flying monkey.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Bracken
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2009
Posts: 2
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 3  

Uh oh.  Sondersted.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Bruce Buchanan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4797
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 4  

A comicbook cost as much as dinner!

***************

I'd much rather have a good comic book than "pigs feet & kraut" or "ox-tail-lamb stew". I know it was the Great Depression and all, but yuck!

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12736
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 5  

Come on, Ed. You've indicated that every page so far contains an example.
Pick one and point us to it!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jesus Garcia
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 April 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2414
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:14pm | IP Logged | 6  

Paul Greer

Jesus Garcia, I don't now if that is a typo. But I don't
like having my name being replaced with Trek Tart. It's
bad
enough I'm a flying monkey.

Me

It was cut and paste in windows which I thought was
trustworky. I've rectifed it.

Myself, I'd rather be a Trek Tart than a Flying Monkey
any day.

At least, Star Trek is real.

Edited by Jesus Garcia on 17 June 2009 at 12:19pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Bracken
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2009
Posts: 2
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:14pm | IP Logged | 7  

I was joking, Al.. Being facetious, if you will.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12736
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:15pm | IP Logged | 8  

No, I won't.

I'll say that you were being an asshole.

One who can't put his money where his mouth is, and claims to be being
facetious when he's called on it.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Bracken
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2009
Posts: 2
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:16pm | IP Logged | 9  

I said I was being facetious in using a very specific term, not the point I was making with it.  I'm getting really bored of typing facetious.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12736
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:18pm | IP Logged | 10  

So, you were kidding about the whole thing about JB "get(ting) into
ridiculous arguments, batten(ing) down the hatches when things don't go
(his) way and let(ting) the flying monkeys pile on" thing, Ed?

Time for a public apology, then.

Right after which I will publicly apologize for calling you an asshole, and
offer to buy you a virtual beer.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36097
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:18pm | IP Logged | 11  

 Ed Bracken wrote:
I wasn't kidding about the mean-spirited pile ons I mentioned, but I was using the term 'flying monkeys' in a facetious way to illustrate the point.

Someone posts a point, an observation, or makes a statement.  Hundreds of people read it.  Several post at the same time reacting to the statement. It can appear to be piling on when it's really just people posting without knowing someone else is posting about the exact same thing.  That's a fact.  Then there's someone like you with a particular bent who wishes to twist it to make the original poster some sort of victim, as if that person shouldn't dare be questioned about the statements they've made.  As if, in fact, everyone who posts here somehow should be able to communicate with one another and have just one or two people question the statements made by the person in question...

And then people are "facetiously" called "flying monkeys" by someone who only just joined the forum and has, except for a single post, only expressed themselves in this thread. 

Amazing.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Greer
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Posts: 14190
Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:19pm | IP Logged | 12  

So is this a tactic to derail the thread in hopes that it will be locked? Or can we keep the conversation going at a civil pace. Which as far as I've read, this has been one of the most calm "debates" on any forum. I've asked Erik for a clarification. He did so on one of my points, but not on another. I don't think I was being disrespectful. He doesn't have to respond if he doesn't want to. But I don't feel I've attacked him in any manner.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 117 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login