| Author |
|
Keith Thomas
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 April 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 3082
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 6:05pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
Micheal to Art to the Toddler -- and, like copying a
videotape, something is lost with each pass.
The things about Adams art that made it unique to me were
the elongated limbs (and subsequent contorted positions)
along with LOTS of extra cross hatching and
cartoonish (anime-ish) faces. And these are things that I
saw cloned in way too many late 80's early 90's artists
(i.e. McFarlane, Leifeld). Maybe he wasn't the first
(tell me who was, I'd like to know) to do those things
but he was the first I saw and the last I noticed
before I noticed lots of other artists doing the exact
same things.
Well one thing you can hang your hat on JB, no one even
tries to copy you since no one else is good enough to try
and copy it and make it look half as good.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31292
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 6:06pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
No problem, Arc.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133578
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 6:39pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
Well one thing you can hang your hat on JB, no one even tries to copy you since no one else is good enough to try and copy it and make it look half as good.•• I've had my share of imitators. But what you say here brings up a point Larry Hama made long ago -- he saw a main reason for the success of Image-style artists as copiability. If you sat down to copy George Perez, or Frank Miller, or me, or (Lord help you!) Neal Adams or Joe Kubert, it was going to be hard work. If you tried to copy Liefeld or Larsen or McFarlane -- not so tough. There's a whole strata of fandom that likes being told they can do it, and it will be easy. Image was pretty much their dream come true.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Keith Thomas
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 April 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 3082
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 8:08pm | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
Amen, just looking at the post McFarlane Spidey pics
posted, it's a contest to see who can be the best xerox
machine.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Mikael Bergkvist
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 23 April 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1857
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 8:11pm | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Popular: copability.
Legend: learnability.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Brad Danson
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1440
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 8:28pm | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
Matt Reed wrote:
| Now I'm refusing to see it? Couldn't be that I don't see it? Huh. |
|
|
Yeah, hard to believe. I've pointed out several similarities and you yet you still can't see any. To call the change from Larsen to Bagley "jarring" when almost everyone else here has been calling it, at least, a "house style" is almost contradictory.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Mike Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 20 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 530
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 8:32pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
Well, keep trying, maybe he'll come around!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Charles Valderrama
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4861
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 9:02pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Bagley copied Larsen's approach to drawing Spider-Man???
That's like saying JB copied from John Romita Sr. isn't it??
-C!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Jamie Coville
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 April 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 9:28pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
A lot of artists learn to draw by copying other artists. Usually they do it because they love that artist and want to draw just like them. Sometimes they want work and looking similar to a popular artist is a good way to get it. Or they think it's better for the title if they draw in a similar style to the last artist and gradually move to their own style.
It's possible two different artists drew on similar influences and both draw in a similar style, or simply just look similar for none of those reasons.
I don't know what the situation was with Bagley, but I wouldn't automatically assume anything.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 9:30pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
QUOTE:
| Sorry, Luca. Don't see it. Some of Bagley's early Spidey work, I can see some influence, but his later, ULTIMATE stuff, nope. |
|
|
Me neither. If anything, I find those two images very dissimilar.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Charles Valderrama
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4861
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 9:47pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
Didn't Bagley's early Spider-Man run follow Larsen leaving the book??
Maybe the editor wanted Bagley to retain some of Larson's style
at first so that fans wouldn't leave the book? Wouldn't be the first
time that's happened.
-C!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Jamie Coville
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 April 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: 11 June 2009 at 10:35pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Yes Bagley pretty much took over right after Larsen left.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Topic Closed)
