Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 11 Next >>
Topic: Q Re: Diversity (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Patrick Mallon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 512
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 1:27pm | IP Logged | 1  

Sub-continent Indians are considered Pacific
Islanders, not Asian.

****

Source this, please?

*********

I'll have to ask my wife. We recently had a conversation about this, and that is what she told me.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Patrick Mallon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 512
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 1:29pm | IP Logged | 2  

Also, please define "sub-continent Indian."

********

Peoples native to the sub-continent known as India.


Edited by Patrick Mallon on 01 September 2006 at 1:30pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Derek Cavin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2403
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 1:30pm | IP Logged | 3  

Other races have changed the way they describe themselves but whites haven't...

Being white, I don't know if white people (Caucasians, etc.) are really interested in changing or even labelling themselves to begin with.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 1:37pm | IP Logged | 4  


 QUOTE:
Also, please define "sub-continent Indian."

********

Peoples native to the sub-continent known as India.

Right.  I realized what a silly question it was just after I posted it but was too late to edit it. 

Anyway, being from that sub-continent myself, I have my doubts about Indians being considered 'Pacific Islanders'.



Edited by Paulo Pereira on 01 September 2006 at 1:43pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ian M. Palmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1342
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 2:12pm | IP Logged | 5  

You think any of that's weird, try "British English" (for the English language, meaning "English" instead of "American English").

IMP.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Dan Bowen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 August 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 953
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 2:22pm | IP Logged | 6  

It's just linguists being linguists, Ian.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike Norris
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4274
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 3:12pm | IP Logged | 7  

Since India is niether an island nor in the Pacific I too am curious how an Indian can be a Pacific Islander.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Josh Goldberg
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2100
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 4:35pm | IP Logged | 8  

Patrick Mallon wrote: "Sub-continent Indians are considered Pacific Islanders, not Asian."

*****

By whom?  One of the things that was drilled into us in during training for the 2000 Census was that what was important was what the respondents considered themselves, not what we, the enumerators (or anyone else) considered them to be.  If a "Sub-continent Indian" insisted on identifying himself as "Asian", I was obligated to mark him down as such, even if I personally would've called him a "Pacific Islander".  The issue was how the respondents identified themselves.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Josh Goldberg
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2100
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 4:37pm | IP Logged | 9  

By the way, there were a lot of "Indians" (quote/unquote) in the area I enumerated, and they pretty much identified themselves as "Asian Indian", to the best of my memory.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 4:45pm | IP Logged | 10  

Beyond that, I don't see how the connection can be made between Pacific Islanders (i.e. inhabitants of Oceania) and people from the sub-continent of India.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Patrick Mallon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 512
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 4:51pm | IP Logged | 11  

Like I said, I need to ask the wife where she got her info from...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike Norris
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4274
Posted: 01 September 2006 at 7:44pm | IP Logged | 12  

Just a wild guess, but perhaps she's heard of the theory that some Native American tribes (aka Indians) migrated to the Americas from the Pacific Islands. At least I thinks thats a theory that was once under discussion.

Why couldn't Columbus call the natives something else!!!!??? And why did it stick even though it was so wrong!!!!!!???

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 11 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login