Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 68 Next >>
Topic: What constitutes a swipe? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
F. Ron Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1289
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 2:53pm | IP Logged | 1  

I'm not a lawyer but in the legal sense of the word, I doubt it.

He was copying everything in those panels and if they had words then they
got copied too. Just like when Andy Worhal copied soup cans he copied the
words too.

I'm unaware that Lichtenstein ever claimed other than the finished physical
painting was 'his own'. The referenced/copied model/material was
understood to come from popular culture.


Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133572
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 2:55pm | IP Logged | 2  

He was copying everything in those panels and if they had words then they
got copied too. Just like when Andy Worhal copied soup cans he copied the
words too.

••

The words on soup cans are not governed by the same conventions as the
words of an author.
Back to Top profile | search
 
F. Ron Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1289
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 2:59pm | IP Logged | 3  

I understand that. And as I said I'm not a lawyer, I'm in no position to
evaluate the strength of such a case in a court of law. I sought only to
underscore his methods when you posed the question to me.

That said, do I think it's plagiarism? First and foremost I think it's
copying. If one can use those terms interchangeably, then yes, it's also plagiarism.

Edited by F. Ron Miller on 27 February 2008 at 3:01pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Andy Mokler
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2799
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:00pm | IP Logged | 4  

Thanks for the link, JB. 

Not condoning or buying into it but his stuff is slightly different than the source material.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Thorsten Brochhaus
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 August 2004
Posts: 328
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:02pm | IP Logged | 5  

He was copying everything in those panels and if they had words then they
got copied too. Just like when Andy Worhal copied soup cans he copied the
words too.

---

Perhaps comicbooks where nothing else than soupcans to him. Which, from my point of view, makes it even worse.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133572
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:02pm | IP Logged | 6  

Not condoning or buying into it but his stuff is slightly different than the
source material.

••

So is Rob Liefeld's -- and in the same way.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133572
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:04pm | IP Logged | 7  

Perhaps comicbooks where nothing else than soupcans to him.

••

That was certainly the way his apostles treated them. Lichtenstien's
cannibalization, according to the critics, was elevating comics to the
lofty realms of Art.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thorsten Brochhaus
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 August 2004
Posts: 328
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:04pm | IP Logged | 8  

Not condoning or buying into it but his stuff is slightly different than the source material.
---
So he didn't even have the skills to do it right.


Edited by Thorsten Brochhaus on 27 February 2008 at 3:05pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Pruitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6168
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:08pm | IP Logged | 9  

Interesting link. I'd say, in every single case, the comic art looks better, and the differences don't change the fact that he didn't design a single piece, just monkeyed around with tones, colors and contrast. All he did was adjust the set.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133572
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:08pm | IP Logged | 10  

So he didn't even have the skills to do it right.

••

A bad artist who found a way to disguise his shortcomings.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steven Cassidy
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Posts: 611
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 11  

I may be wrong -- but Rob can draw on his own talent, right?  He hasn't lifted everything he's ever put on a page, right?  I've only ever seen a couple panels exhibited as RL swipes.

 

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133572
Posted: 27 February 2008 at 3:11pm | IP Logged | 12  

I've only ever seen a couple panels exhibited as RL swipes.

••

"Couple"? That's either astonishingly ill-informed, or astonishingly
disingenuous.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 68 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login