Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Announcements
Byrne Robotics > Announcements Page of 19 Next >>
Topic: Wikipedia - A Reminder (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133726
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 6:15am | IP Logged | 1  
The JBF is a Wikipedia-Free Zone. Any posts that link to or take information from Wikipedia will be deleted no matter what their content.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Tom French
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4154
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 6:58am | IP Logged | 2  
I'm glad you've taken this stand on Wikipedia.  As a teacher, it drives me crazy -- don't allow my students to reference it, either.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Penn
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 12795
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 8:19am | IP Logged | 3  

I've had some of my law students cite to Wikipedia as a valid source of information.

'Tis lamentable....
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Hanson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 February 2006
Posts: 2396
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 9:33am | IP Logged | 4  
Curious--what's wrong with Wikipedia?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Roger A Ott II
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5371
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 9:59am | IP Logged | 5  
The fact that the information contained there can be edited by anybody makes that information automatically suspect, in my opinion.  Too much chance for bias and unverifiable gossip to become part of an article, and then suddenly things become "fact" that are not even close to it. 

Edited by Roger A Ott II on 16 January 2007 at 10:00am
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Craig Markley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3969
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 10:32am | IP Logged | 6  
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6680
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 1:06pm | IP Logged | 7  
Hah!
That should put it to bed!
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Juan Jose Colin Arciniega
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6413
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 5:36pm | IP Logged | 8  
Good one Graig!
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Trevor Krysak
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4163
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 7:38pm | IP Logged | 9  
Alex Trebek is a deity! He is the god of Jeopardy. He giveth and taketh away. Be sure to speak to him in the proper manner though. Always in the form of a question.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Randy Sterger
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 January 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 9:09pm | IP Logged | 10  
I don't know - I think it's funny - the Trebeck thing.

Wiki is a new and emerging thing - I'm sure none of the creators want it to be "wrong". Like all new things, they'll find a way eventually or it'll fade away.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Chris Hutton
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 11667
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 9:30pm | IP Logged | 11  
I have a friend, a teacher for crissakes, who loves that site! Were a to be teaching a course that required any research papers, I would also ban that place. Completely unreliable.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Brad Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1717
Posted: 16 January 2007 at 10:38pm | IP Logged | 12  

You would think that if such a site was to have much credibility, it would be able to catagorize it's information and qualify it depending upon the source. 

For example, if the actual subject of the topic were to respond, then that person's response would be given the highest priority.

For example, for a topic like the Catholic Church, the Pope himself (if he decided to post a summary) might be given more creedence than say a post from the Anti-Catholic League.

Or a synopsis about Shakespear from the Dean of Shakespearean liturature from Oxford might have more creedence than the editor of Teen Beat.

But there appears to be no such regulation.

On the other hand, and as devil's advocate, there is something thrilling and exciting about complete freedom of expression and faceless libel... sort of like watching a car wreck.
Back to Top profile | search
 

Page of 19 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login