Author |
|
Al Cook Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: December 21 2004 Posts: 12735
|
Posted: November 25 2006 at 9:58pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
Valerie/Daphne -- shows what I was paying attention to!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Al Cook Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: December 21 2004 Posts: 12735
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 9:46am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Jo;
Maybe I've taken too much inspiration from the title of this thread. It's
entirely possible that you were lightheartedly joking along with us and I
missed it completely, so pay no attention to this "Mr. Grumpy".
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mary Ives Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: August 19 2005 Location: United States Posts: 206
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 10:10am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
"But just to revert to the "Men are more visual" assertion I think
that is a bit of a myth - Joakim is closer to the truth, men are just
more easily aroused full stop.
And that suits me just fine."
Have I told you lately that I love you? In a purely platonic sort of way, that is.
:D
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Stan Lomisceau Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: October 12 2006 Posts: 530
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 10:15am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
i do not understand why ms harvert makes such comments about the men.
all men ar epeople just like women are too and that does not mean they
should be insulted. if mr byrne is attracted to marge simpsons then
maybe some lesbians women are too. it does make sense if you think
about it. now that i see it i can also say that marge is very nice to
see and if i had a chance with her well you know what i would do!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Mietus Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: April 16 2004 Location: United States Posts: 9697
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 10:32am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Jo Harvatt wrote:
But just to revert to the "Men are more visual" assertion I
think that is a bit of a myth |
|
|
Again, showing either your naivete, your lack of education in this subject, or
your stubbornness.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jo Harvatt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 06 2006 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 2:15pm | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
al wrote:
Jo;
Maybe I've taken too much inspiration from the title of this thread. It's entirely possible that you were lightheartedly joking along with us and I missed it completely, so pay no attention to this "Mr. Grumpy". |
|
|
Glad your sense of humour is back online Al, yes I was only teasing.
I am very fond of men and did not intend to be demeaning.
By and large I believe all this "Women are from Venus Men are from B and Q" is a load of nonsense and that anatomical considerations aside most differences are cultural rather than innate.
However every now and then something will pull me up short and I think "Gosh! That must be strange!"
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jo Harvatt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 06 2006 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 2:19pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
John wrote:
Again, showing either your naivete, your lack of education in this subject, or your stubbornness. |
|
|
Twist the knife a bit more John why don't ye?
Naivete - possible although I am not totally lacking experience.
Lack of education - doubtful. I read some interesting research some years back that showed that both men and women were equally physiologically aroused by viewing sexual content, hence my assertion. I do try to be reasonably well informed.
Stubborness - You got me bang to rights Gov, I'll come along quietly.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jo Harvatt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 06 2006 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 2:21pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
mary wrote:
Have I told you lately that I love you? In a purely platonic sort of way, that is. |
|
|
Nice to know that somebody does. : ) and the feelings mutual I'm sure !
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jo Harvatt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 06 2006 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 2:23pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
mr lomisceau wrote:
i can also say that marge is very nice to see and if i had a chance with her well you know what i would do! |
|
|
I'm sure you would make a very handsome pair.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jo Harvatt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 06 2006 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 2:25pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Fantastic graphic Brian.
Made my day, thank you.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Michael Roberts Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: April 20 2004 Location: United States Posts: 14911
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 3:02pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
Some studies on female visual arousal:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/06/030613075252.ht m
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060930094145.ht m
Anecdotally, I know far too many women into Harry Potter fan art and yaoi to doubt that women can be as visually oriented as men.
What the first study suggests is that although women and men are the same in terms of the ability to be visually aroused, they do not give that arousal as much importance as men do when selecting a potential mate.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jo Harvatt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 06 2006 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: November 26 2006 at 3:17pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Thanks Michael, I am very good at remembering the gist of what I read but very bad at recalling sources.
I would say the latter paragraph is fairly accurate inasmuch as women tend tobe attracted more by the package deal (no pun intended) rather than one specific aspect of a man.
However, if we are talking long term partner I would have thought men (once they are past adolescence) similarly adopt a more balanced (and less shallow)approach than just going on looks. Even short term actually because I can remember a girl I knew who ticked all the right boxes visually yet couldn't pull a rotten tooth out of a dead horses head.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|