Author |
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133688
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 8:09am | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
I was told by the owner that in no uncertain terms if
*M* got wind of it, they'd cut ties to that store...was
that true?
****
That was not true.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Steve Horton Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 3574
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 8:16am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Yeah, and look at 'em now. What has the Comics Journal done for the industry lately, except for griping?
Their parent company gave us those beautiful Peanuts books (and will soon be doing Dennis the Menace books just like them) but what has TCJ done?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133688
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 8:21am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
...what has TCJ done?
***
Given a whole bunch of pseudo-intellectual "fans"
the model for their not-so-original thinking.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Howard Mackie Byrne Robotics Security
Armed and Dangerous
Joined: 16 February 2005 Posts: 666
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 10:00am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
<<I was told by the owner that in no uncertain terms if
*M* got wind of it, they'd cut ties to that store...was
that true?
****
That was not true.>>
I'll second that as someone who worked on staff at Marvel
at the time. THAT would have taken much more
organizational abilty, communication and foresight that
Marvel was capable of. I often marvel(no pun intended) at
the how much credit is given to the big publishers.
Howard
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133688
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 10:02am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
What we see in this retailer's confused attitude is something of the mentality the internet would come to foster greatly. It's the Crusaders, here seen as "I would be a Crusader, but the Big Bad Company would GET me! (Ain't I special?)"It's pretty pathetic, all things considered. Actually, it's pathetic even if you consider nothing else!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Matt Hawes Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 16513
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 10:11am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
John O'Conner wrote:
...I remember this petition well, and often wondered why aren’t any other Marvel artist’s signing it? When I asked my local store if they were going to post one, I was told by the owner that in no uncertain terms if *M* got wind of it, they'd cut ties to that store... |
|
|
Heck, if publicly criticizing the policies of certain publishers causes them to cut off ties, I'm pretty much sunk.
I wasn't open in 1986 (I was still in high school), but I doubt what that retailer says would've happened.
Edited to fix quote.
Edited by Matt Hawes on 15 August 2006 at 10:16am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Neil Welch Byrne Robotics Member
Troll
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: Antarctica Posts: 275
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 10:26am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
Are you the questioner from the other board, Neil?
I am not! This thread left me wondering as to why you didn't sign it.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Brian Hunt Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 5178
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 12:48pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Jason, use the Force to get the original person who asked the question to come here a put forth the question once more so that we all may know the answer. Use phrases like "What are ya? Chicken?" and loud clucking noises if you must.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Wallace Sellars Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 01 May 2004 Location: United States Posts: 17705
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 1:00pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Good grief...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Ian M. Palmer Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 1342
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 2:01pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
I'm sure JB's posted about this before. My impression is that JB's view was that most of Kirby's work was done as work-for-hire and belonged to Marvel, full stop. I can sympathise with that view, but I'm horrified at the idea that, say, Siegel and Schuster could come up with one of the most enduring fictional creations of modern times and receive no proportionate reward. The terms at the time might have been such-and-such, but still don't seem fair.
IMP.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jason Czeskleba Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 30 April 2004 Posts: 4649
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 3:46pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
Ian M. Palmer wrote:
I'm sure JB's posted about this before. My impression is that JB's view
was that most of Kirby's work was done as work-for-hire and belonged to
Marvel, full stop. |
|
|
I couldn't find anything via searching, googling, or checking the FAQ,
so I asked. At any rate, my understanding is that the petition
was specifically about the return of Kirby's original art, not the
broader issues of whether or not he was unfairly compensated or ripped off for
his creations (I know JB's position on those issues).
Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 15 August 2006 at 7:01pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Ian M. Palmer Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 1342
|
Posted: 15 August 2006 at 4:58pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
I could be wrong. It happened once before, allegedly.
IMP.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|