| Posted: 01 August 2008 at 10:29am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
"The Infidel/Pigman is a story you've not read, so I suggest you stop pretending you know what it's about, because you realy don't. My blog is there as a pre-publication promotion of the book, it's not the book, no matter what you infer from what I have there. "
Bosch. I haven't read the story. True. But you have presented a lot of your ideas as to what's going into it. That's all you're giving us, so that's what we're commenting on. And it's more than enough. You don't strike me as all that complicated, Bosch. I'm not foreseeing a lot of layers in your story. Not exactly Shakespeare. In fact, and I mean this seriously, judging from the way you express your views here and on your website, Mickey Spillane and Tom Clancy will seem subtle, complex and shakespearean by comparison.
This is the impression I get from the way you promote your book. That promotion is your way of telling us, the potential readers what the book is about. If I'm wrong, tell me where I'm wrong. While it's true that I haven't read it, surely you have. Tell me how I'm wrong. You have that power. And since I'm not going to be able to read it for quite some time, if ever, you are at no risk of contradiction.
From what I've read it's about some guy who goes into conflict areas tracking the bad guys wearing a costume made out of pig-leather so that he can frighten the terrorists with his uncanny power of being "unclean". Amazingly subtle. Is this wrong?
|