| Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:52pm | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
I think it boils down to my summary on the previous page - the bottom line is that the banks need to be kept open to keep the stocks from reaching a certain nadir whereby credit becomes non-profitable, and thus, credit is eliminated, thus crippling the American economy.
I think that's why people were supporting the "bailout" - not to help fat cats stay fat - to keep the economy afloat.
People opposed it because a talking point came out that this was just screwing the tax payer and dodging personal responsibility - which, yes, in fact, it was, but look at the options.
The funny thing is - this talking point went across the board - it wasn't of the left or right - as noted - I listen to a lot of right wing radio - where I live it's all they got - some right wing shows were bitching about the tax burden, while others were stressing the need to get this done at any cost. Then I went home this weekend, to San Francisco, and heard the left wing radio reply - and same thing! Some hosts were fanning the flames of tax burden to the working man, while others were saying "STFU, we need to get this fixed!"
So... you know. I'm at a loss for what to do, but I am assured that the economy could have been salvaged, but for people playing politics on both sides of the isle.
|