Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:09pm | IP Logged | 1  

Are you the Robin Taylor from the Next Men letters page?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Horace Austin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 November 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 634
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:10pm | IP Logged | 2  

Bruce Buchanan wrote:

Yes; this is one of those weird, rare pieces of controversial legislation that didn't fall neatly along party lines. You had Pelosi and Bush both lobbying for the bailout and many Republicans and Democrats voting against it.

***

Kind of reminds me of the battle over the North American Free Trade Agreement.

President Clinton and most Congressional Republicans supported it.

Most Congressional Democrats opposed it.  Public opposition to NAFTA was highlighted by the infamous Halloween Coalition: Ralph Nader, Jesse Jackson, Ross Perot and Patrick Buchanan.



Edited by Horace Austin on 29 September 2008 at 6:24pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:35pm | IP Logged | 3  

Joe ask Mike Myers.  Heh.

I don't know how anyone can defend Bush's policies.  He looked so pathetic this morning.  I wonder sometimes if he's back on the bottle.  I read that book "Bush On The Couch" and the doctor thought W a "dry drunk" (among other things). 

I swear Bush has been the worst president I've lived through and the worst possibly we've ever had.  Nixon was bad but at least he resigned (even if Gary Seven had something to do with it). 

NAFTA is part of the problem that has come home to roost.  It's one of the reasons the financial system is in the terrible shape it is in.

One way people could still support Bush is by saying the "real" free trade policies were not allowed to work, because of this or that, so Bush wasn't able to really get in there and "operate" like he could have if he was a dictator like Pinochet.  That argument is usually a favorite of the defenders of Bush and others like him. 


Edited by Michael Retour on 29 September 2008 at 6:42pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:44pm | IP Logged | 4  

A better question is why are Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid now supporting Bush.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:52pm | IP Logged | 5  

I think it boils down to my summary on the previous page - the bottom line is that the banks need to be kept open to keep the stocks from reaching a certain nadir whereby credit becomes non-profitable, and thus, credit is eliminated, thus crippling the American economy.

I think that's why people were supporting the "bailout" - not to help fat cats stay fat - to keep the economy afloat.

People opposed it because a talking point came out that this was just screwing the tax payer and dodging personal responsibility - which, yes, in fact, it was, but look at the options.

The funny thing is - this talking point went across the board - it wasn't of the left or right - as noted - I listen to a lot of right wing radio - where I live it's all they got - some right wing shows were bitching about the tax burden, while others were stressing the need to get this done at any cost.  Then I went home this weekend, to San Francisco, and heard the left wing radio reply - and same thing!  Some hosts were fanning the flames of tax burden to the working man, while others were saying "STFU, we need to get this fixed!"

So... you know.  I'm at a loss for what to do, but I am assured that the economy could have been salvaged, but for people playing politics on both sides of the isle.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:55pm | IP Logged | 6  

Now - having gotten that out of the way - let's move on to more upbeat and informative talk.

Are you guys all up to date on your Hobo lore and ways?  Sure, sure, you think it's easy ridin' the rails, carrying all you own in a bindle-stiff and eating beans in a can by the side of the road, looking for Nice Ladies who give out free pie, but there's so much more you need to know.

There's a whole Hobo code and naming convention.  There's self-preservation and defense.  There's scenarios of what to do if your idiot man-child traveling companion kills his pet mouse. 

And don't get me started on the Hobo Bartering system...

Anyway - my 'bo name is San Francisco Mike.  I'm layin' claim to the western territories.   

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 6:57pm | IP Logged | 7  

Oh, and?  In this time of crisis?  Canibalism is a perfectly acceptable option.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ray Brady
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3737
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 7:05pm | IP Logged | 8  

My understanding is that, if you own a top hat, you're automatically the
Hobo King.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 7:07pm | IP Logged | 9  

Nothing like a can of beans and riding the rails.


Edited by Michael Retour on 29 September 2008 at 7:07pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 7:10pm | IP Logged | 10  

"A better question is why are Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid now supporting Bush."

Because they are weak?  Working for the other team?  They are surely in favor of Wall St. over Main St. 

Mr. O'Brien we don't need to bailout bad derivative bets to save the USA. 

I do like the music of Tom Waits so that's where the "sitting 'round the fire with a can of beans" comes from. 

Now all we need are some railroads.  Heh.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 7:19pm | IP Logged | 11  

Well, no, my understanding is that we need to keep the banks and lending institutions open, or else the credit market will dry up and most of what we do - buy cars, homes, open businesses, go to school, etc, is done on credit.

I get where you're coming from, and I'm not gonna lie - I'm no Michael Retour or Meyers, but... that's my understanding of this so called "bailout".

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 29 September 2008 at 7:21pm | IP Logged | 12  

Oh, and, you know, to clarify - the idea of sitting around the fire eating beans is the Hobo lore that Waits was singing about - he didn't invent hobo lore - he's referencing it in song.  Or am I mis-reading your post?

And Ray - that's true, but sometimes you have to shank a 'bo to get said Top Hat.

Bonus points if the Top Hat was Masonic.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login