Perhaps because choice gives those very few who may be pro-abortion the legal ability to act indiscriminately on the sentiment, those who are anti-choice find self-justification?

Edit: by pro-abortion I mean, for example, the woman of the type JB mentioned far back in the thread, the one who got pregnant and aborted simply because she wanted to test her fertility.

It is sort of like people saying "I love dirty air" etc.

Who is for pollution?  Maybe tobacco companies. 

So then are you for "choice" for pollution?

After watching those two last night all I can say is "we're in it" and everyone knows what that means right?

Ha...yes!

Bend over everyone.  I'll have another sir!!

Now that's my kind of politics!

Personally I would say I am pro-abortion...in that I am pro- having such a procedure be legal and available and I see the necessity for some women to undergo said procedure. However, using the cigarette example...I am gladly ANTI-choice on that matter. I'd love to make them illegal. Cigarettes don't just affect the smoker. The second-hand smoke affects everyone around them. And the health costs smokers generate are enourmous. We make other addictive drugs illegal, so why not this one? (this is a rhetorical question, I know all the real reasons why). 

I was bored and angry after that debate.  Both those jokers are for this bailout and they don't even know,

Me too! And it was so obvious...and then neither of them were able to give any real specifics about how their plans have changed bc of the financial crisis. Even after Lehrer prodded them twice on it.

How does everyone like watching the talking heads after the debates?  What garbage. 

I get the impression that 90% of what they say is prepared well before the debate even takes place.

Now that's my kind of politics!

Classic. Why do I picture you holding a cigar and moving your eyebrows up and down while saying that (Groucho Marx style) :-)