Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14891
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 3:58pm | IP Logged | 1  

I don't have a lot of trust in the paper above that stated a inquiry found nothing of substance to warrant further investigation. That can go either way after the fact. many things can disappear or be swept under the rug.

----

As far as I can tell, there weren't several allegations of this going on. It was testimony by one fired nurse who had and continues to have an anti-abortion agenda. The Illinois State Attorney General looked into it and found nothing.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Tom French
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4154
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:00pm | IP Logged | 2  

...many things can disappear or be swept under the rug.

Wait... then they swept the dead babies under the rug???

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:01pm | IP Logged | 3  

So it would seem a disgruntled employee was fired and taking shots back? At least possible. If you're a consiracy fanatic, maybe she was against the practice, or even an instance, and got fired? I see resonable doubt in both directions. Oh well.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:01pm | IP Logged | 4  

"agenda"?  Obsession is more like it.

I'm

Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:02pm | IP Logged | 5  

Michael wrote:
And as a side note, why do we have humane laws regarding pets but this is such a brushfire issue?


Because we can afford to be humane to our pets. They are our property. Who do you trust with the decision of life or death when it comes to human beings? The family? Doctors? Legislators? Judges? For any one of them you pick there would be an immediate counter-argument showing why it would be a bad choice.

And remember, laws prohibiting attempted suicide are still out there. You can't even decide for yourself when YOU should die, let alone deciding for someone else.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:04pm | IP Logged | 6  

And remember, laws prohibiting attempted suicide are still out there. You can't even decide for yourself when YOU should die, let alone deciding for someone else.

Yes, but.....

For anyone to think they can legislate someone out of killing themselves is pure stupid. Anyone that truly wants to die, not just attention, will find a way.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:17pm | IP Logged | 7  

Michael, as someone who believes that overpopulation is still an enormous problem in the world, I have absolutely no issue with someone who wants to make room for someone else. However, the fact remains that you can't just try to kill yourself (successful suicide isn't a crime, naturally).

Of course the laws are stupid. They can't keep drugs out of prisons, where the users have no income, are under lock and key 24/7 and are surrounded by armed guards! How the hell are they going to keep the drugs off the frigging streets?

Being stupid hasn't kept a law off the books since Moses!


Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:20pm | IP Logged | 8  

Have you read the current projections of the U.S. population in the near future? And this drags in immigration as part of the problem, not all of it by any means.

Soon there won't be much of anything for anyone because there will be too many anyones!

Ever seen the explanation with the jar of gumballs?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:22pm | IP Logged | 9  

The gumballs aren't ringing any bells, Michael. Could you enlighten me please?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:35pm | IP Logged | 10  

Hmm, try this link.

http://www.numbersusa.com/video/

Back to Top profile | search
 
Rich Rice
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 April 2008
Posts: 195
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:54pm | IP Logged | 11  

Geoff, I like your pick. And yes, none of the choices are illegal. As it falls in the real world there is much in life that isn't illegal but not particularly ethical. Or at least some things fall under the category of being less ethical. -So what would a business do if marketing revealed option D proved to be 3 times more effective that option A? Which has more value, being as ethical as possible or making as much profit as possible?

You are right, the issue of value plays a big part in this mess. Inflated values at the customer level but inflated levels when traded.I am not an MBA or familiar with the particulars of lending, but it appears to my uninformed eye that these loans were bundled and sold in a manner that hid the 'rot.' In essence it was a pyramid scheme that worked so long as values continued to rise and the economic winds were at their backs. Much of all of this was 'legal', but hardly ethical. Particularly to have people who had no stake or interest putting up the cash to rescue a process that worked to private benefit.

-One element of this proposed solution that is very problematic to me  is the degree it skirts being constitutional. Too much power and control is placed in the hands of one man, even with the new conditions set by Congress.

I would rather they took a bit more time. And exercised more control.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 26 September 2008 at 4:56pm | IP Logged | 12  

Remember when the Onion made this joke a year ago and it was funny...

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/09/mccain_wins_ debate.html?f=1

... that McCain... writing his own reality....

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login