Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18281
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 4:46pm | IP Logged | 1  

The problem with your referring chart Kevin is that it does not reflect the reality of how people use the term or, in fact what the term means.  When people talk about ambulance chasers they are generally referring to personal injury, or tort lawyers, without drawing any distinction as evidenced by the definition Scott provided. 

-------------------------

I am working on a rebus rebuttal; meet you here tomorrow?  :)

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Myers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 December 2004
Posts: 831
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 5:04pm | IP Logged | 2  

LMAO.


Edited by Michael Myers on 23 September 2008 at 5:05pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 5:48pm | IP Logged | 3  

Emery, normally I love you, but if you refer to that dreck I quoted as "Al's
site" one more time I'm going to have to go mediaeval on your ass.

That site, if you're going to ascribe it to a member of this forum, is Scott
Richard's site.

He offered it up in a post where he claimed that 'ambulance chasers' was
not shorthand for all tort lawyers but just a subset of those lawyers.
Presumably he intended for the link to that site to prove his point.

It failed miserably, as anyone who spends any time on that site (what I
quoted from it was a mere tip of the iceberg, sadly) will quickly realize
that not only does that site espouse the exact opposite of what Scott was
trying to say (quite effectively proving Geoff's point, I might add) by
lumping all tort lawyers into their scorn, but that is merely a subsection of
a site dedicated to lumping all lawyers, regardless of what branch of law
they practice, into the old, tired, and unfair characterizations that are
exactly the kind of thing that Geoff is speaking out against.

At any rate, it is most definitely not "my site."
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 6:05pm | IP Logged | 4  

Al's site was lawyer jokes and seemed to be informal to say the least.

Yep.  That's why I specifically included the word "fun" when directing him toward the site and didn't offer it as any type of evidence.  I was chuckling as I read through it so decided to share.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 6:07pm | IP Logged | 5  

And you thought, given what Geoff had already said about hurtful
stereotypes, that he would find it amusing?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Alan Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2007
Posts: 133
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 7:48pm | IP Logged | 6  

There are good lawyers.  I know of one prominent attorney in my state (who is also a state legislator) who was instrumental in getting tort reform passed.

I had no problem understanding the distinction Scott was making between lawyers who are primarily interested in personal gain vs attorneys who practice in an ethical manner.

And presidents should be lawyers?  Inane generalization.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 8:39pm | IP Logged | 7  

And presidents should be lawyers?  Inane generalization.

Did you read all that I wrote or did you just decide you would insult me for fun. See here is where the "I'll treat you, as you treat me" comes into play. 

Did you read this part I posted?:
I am not saying that only lawyers should be president, but I do value that educational background. If you have a good man with a law degree running against a good man without one, I would go with the one that had the degree in law.

I continue to smite you. :0)

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Emery Calame
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5773
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 9:04pm | IP Logged | 8  


Emery, normally I love you, but if you refer to that dreck I quoted as "Al's
site" one more time I'm going to have to go mediaeval on your ass.

I'm picturing Dan Rather dressed in a chain coif and gothic breast plate, speaking into the pommel of a zweihander for some reason....

Do what you have to Al.  I just don't find Geoff's definition of ambulance chaser or your defense of Geoff's definition particularly persuasive. I shed no tears for people offended by lawyer jokes anymore than you shed tears for people offended by Palin jokes. That's life. That's how I'm wired. If that makes me "the other" then so be it. So if you have a mind to put on your regulate'n boots then now's the time.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 9:26pm | IP Logged | 9  

I think Al was kidding Emery, I just think he doesn't want to be credited as a person that has a website full of jokes that put down a group of people, funny or not.

I hear woman or blonde jokes all the time and people think I will completely enjoy them, some I do, but after a while they get old.

Even though I like Hillary this is funny.



Edited by Jodi Moisan on 23 September 2008 at 9:28pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Jeff Alan Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2007
Posts: 133
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 9:34pm | IP Logged | 10  

"I am not saying that only lawyers should be president, but I do value that educational background. If you have a good man with a law degree running against a good man without one, I would go with the one that had the degree in law."

There are a lot of people in government with law degrees, and I'm not sure that's necessarily been an advantageous thing.  Maybe we should elect nothing but chemists and accountants. 

I cannot be harmed by your smiting.  Smite.  Smitening.  Something like that.



Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 9:38pm | IP Logged | 11  

Wait... Jodi is smitten by Jeff?  Uh... wait, what?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 10:05pm | IP Logged | 12  

Chuck, has been in Germany and Paris on business for about a week now, a girl gets lonely and it makes me want to go for something completely different, shake things up a little.  Chucks not a self important pontificator, so what the heck.

Edited to remove cuss word, I am trying Geoff. :0) 

 

I read where Biden has been making some strange statements, I am going to chalk it up to being tired from non stop campaigning, but what if he was ill again, how would that play out? I  wish him continued health, but would Hillary be waiting in the wings?



Edited by Jodi Moisan on 24 September 2008 at 1:45am
Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login