Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 5:17pm | IP Logged | 1  

Can't you start an economic rants topic and leave this one to the election?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 5:24pm | IP Logged | 2  

Even though I agree with Meyers most of the time (shocker) I do admit when he and Michael start posting tomes of data my eyes kind of glaze over.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Alan Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2007
Posts: 133
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 5:32pm | IP Logged | 3  

Looking at hunger trends in the U.S. can be tricky.  What individuals report as food shortcomings are often in contrast to their actual weight status.  This is in contrast to other parts of the world where perceived lack of food is more closely correlated with low body weight.



1: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Jan-Feb;39(1):31-6.

Food insecurity and gender are risk factors for obesity.

Center for Public Health and Health Policy, University of Connecticut, East Hartford, CT 06108, USA. katie.martin@uconn.edu

OBJECTIVE: Examine relationships between adult obesity, childhood overweight, and food insecurity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTING: Community settings in Hartford, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 200 parents and their 212 children, aged 2-12. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adult obesity (Body Mass Index [BMI] > 30), childhood overweight (BMI-for-age > 95(th) percentile), and household food security (U.S. Department of Agriculture module). ANALYSIS: Chi-square tests between weight status and socioeconomic characteristics. Multinomial regression analyses to determine risk factors for adult obesity and childhood overweight. RESULTS: Over half of parents (51%) were obese, and almost one-third of children (31.6%) were overweight. Over half of households were food insecure. Food insecure adults were significantly more likely to be obese as those who were food secure (Odds Ratio [OR]=2.45, p = .02). Being a girl and having an obese parent doubled the likelihood of children being overweight (OR=2.56, P = .01; OR=2.32, P = .03). Children with family incomes below 100% of poverty were half as likely to be overweight as those with higher incomes (OR=.47, P = .05). Food insecurity did not increase odds of childhood overweight. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Obesity prevention programs and policies need to address food insecurity and gender as key risk factors.



1: J Nutr. 2006 May;136(5):1395-400. < ="1.2">Wilde PE, Peterman JN.

Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA. parke.wilde@tufts.edu

This study examined the relation between household food security status and current measured weight and change in self-reported weight over 12 mo using data from the 1999-2000 and 2001-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Current measured BMI categories were as follows: underweight (<18.5 kg/m(2)), overweight (> or =25 kg/m(2)), and obese (> or =30 kg/m(2)). Change in self-reported weight used 2 cut-off points, i.e., a gain/loss of at least 2.27 kg (5 lb) and at least 4.54 kg (10 lb). Household food security categories were as follows: fully secure, marginally secure, insecure without hunger, and insecure with hunger. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for race/ethnicity, household income, education level, and current health status. Compared with women in households that were fully food secure, women in households that were marginally food secure [odds ratio (OR) 1.58] and food insecure without hunger (OR 1.76) were significantly more likely to be obese. Compared with women in households that were fully food secure, those in households that were marginally food secure were significantly more likely to gain at least 4.54 kg (OR 1.68). Compared with men in households that were fully food secure, men in households that were marginally food secure were more likely to be obese and to gain at least 4.54 kg, but these effects were smaller in magnitude than those for women and insignificant in some specifications. This study corroborates previous cross-sectional associations between intermediate levels of food insecurity and obesity for women, and it finds an association between intermediate levels of food insecurity and 12-mo weight gain for women.







Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 5:33pm | IP Logged | 4  

Miller the economics has nothing to do with the election?

Gimme a break. 

How's that stimulus check plan deal doing BTW?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Myers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 December 2004
Posts: 831
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 5:34pm | IP Logged | 5  


 QUOTE:
C'mon Mike I liked it better when I was crazy MF, out of my mind, hated jazz, etc.  Let's get back to that!


I'm flattered, but you've got work to do...



 QUOTE:
"Even though I agree with Meyers most of the time (shocker) I do admit when he and Michael start posting tomes of data my eyes kind of glaze over."


Smiling.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 5:41pm | IP Logged | 6  

I posted this on the Canadian Election thread, but it could stand repeating.


I figured out the Three Laws of Economics from Mr. Myers and Mr. Retour on the US Election thread, so it's not all bad.

1. Money flows from the poor body to the rich one.

2. The other guy's theory can't fix this problem.

3. Everything is cheaper after Boxing Day.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 6:15pm | IP Logged | 7  

(Hopes Wayde won't have to explain what "Boxing Day" is...)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 6:18pm | IP Logged | 8  

The day we celebrate Rocky Balboa's split decision against Apollo Creed?

I know what it really means.



Edited by Geoff Gibson on 22 September 2008 at 6:18pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 6:18pm | IP Logged | 9  

Work?

Mike I think you like me.  You've found a sparring partner. 


Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 6:19pm | IP Logged | 10  

Of course you do, Geoff. No one who likes Mike Holmes could be that
unaware of Canadian holidays...

Edited by Al Cook on 22 September 2008 at 6:19pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 6:19pm | IP Logged | 11  

That's easy Al. It's when Canadians get smacked about the head and shoulders for buying the wrong gifts on Christmas.

Duh.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 22 September 2008 at 6:20pm | IP Logged | 12  

You've been to Christmas at my house, I see.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login