Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 8:18am | IP Logged | 1  

"The thing is, I haven't heard the line "Hey pull yourself up by your own bootstraps." When applied to this huge government bailout. "

Considering the depth of the Quagmire the US is in now, perhaps they should switch to "pull yourself up by your own hair"  (like in the Baron Von Munchausen story)

Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Love
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 October 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2711
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 8:39am | IP Logged | 2  

I was noticing steady and significant decline in my 401K and mutual funds during Clinton's last  year in office. While the current administration didn't do anything to help while the years they were in office, the downturn had already started before they got into power.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Jeff Alan Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2007
Posts: 133
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 9:14am | IP Logged | 3  

"Wow, Chris -- you sure do get pissed off over a couple of innocent quotes, don't you?"

***********************************

I didn't interpret those replies as being angry, but simply an attempt to clarify the extent of interest group contributions and the variety of candidates who accept them.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 9:42am | IP Logged | 4  

If there hadn't been a bailout , we would have bypassed recession.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article3656.html

How's this economy working for you Christopher?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

So Bush just saved us from a depression? That was nice of him.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36446
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 9:43am | IP Logged | 5  

But the point Tom was making wasn't that Dems don't benefit from special interest groups, but that McCain is making it his mantra to stop lobbyist influence as well as that of big business...all the while having many of them in positions of power in his campaign.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36446
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 9:56am | IP Logged | 6  

 Jodi Moisan wrote:
but to credit Bush with such a complicated plan, come on, the mans a nitwit.

As much as I am loathe to defend Bush, you can't withhold credit for the bailout from Bush on the grounds that it's too complicated for someone like him to understand while claiming he's one of the masterminds behind the buildup to our incursion in Iraq. He can't be smart and cunning enough to do one and too dumb to understand the other.  In other words, every president relies on the Fed, Congress, the Senate, the FBI, the CIA, political advisers, etc. to aid them in making choices.  To lay it all at the feet of one person such that they, and they alone, are expected to understand every piece of legislation to the word is silly at best. Comments like the one I quoted from you above look petty in that light.  Too many things we can actually criticize Bush for that the above feels like a cheap potshot to me.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36446
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 10:06am | IP Logged | 7  

 Christopher Allen Miller wrote:
He's leading in one out of four polls.

So it's a statistical dead heat given +/-.  What I'd be interested in is how close other Democratic Presidential candidates have polled at this time in the campaign in Indiana.  That would be more telling to me than pulling poll numbers this week for the state and claiming McCain is ahead.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Alan Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2007
Posts: 133
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 10:11am | IP Logged | 8  

A perspective I pulled from Christopher's comments is that a variety of candidates accept donations from lobbyists while not remaining clear on their opposition or support of such groups.  For example, in Reid's case, he has taken seemingly conflicting views regarding deregulation of such institutions.

This seems to be a common problem with many politicians from a multitude of political backgrounds and affiliations.

At any rate, as stated, I didn't see his Christopher's response as pissed off.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36446
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 10:17am | IP Logged | 9  

I didn't see it as pissed off, but misplaced.  The point isn't that Tom was trying to say Democrats don't benefit from special interest groups but that McCain has made it his rallying cry to rout them out while having many in his employ.  He's taken a definitive position and yet his actions appear to be contradictory.  So pulling Democrats taking campaign contributions from special interest groups and posting right after Tom's post seems, at least to me, misplaced.  Have those Democrats made it as much of a rallying cry as McCain?  Not from what I've seen and read over the last decade.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Alan Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2007
Posts: 133
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 10:25am | IP Logged | 10  

That's fine.  We're in partial agreement.  I think it's useful to see how candidates are supported.  Whether it's McCain's rallying cry or someone else's political philosophy, accepting money from seemingly oppositional sources appears questionable. And, to me, pertinent to the conversation.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 10:29am | IP Logged | 11  

Pick up today's Chicago Tribune and some of the details are spelled out there. 

There was a run on the money markets funds ($90b in one day by freaked out Americans) per the Trib but that's not half the story.

The Trib further goes on, in one of the articles, that the banks have not been telling the American public how bad it is (as I said many times).  In other words, the banks have been lying and the regulators (where have we heard this before?  The FAA maybe?) let them slide until it became a panicked run. 

I am sure any newspaper large enough has all the gory details.

The Trib says the price tag is $700b now but in the printed edition it said $500b so in the space of a few hours it went up $200b and that's just a guess on the part of everyone and does not to address the systemic crisis whatsoever.

You get a run on the banks and then you will see something no one here has ever seen.  Yeah, people were lining up outside Countrywide but nationally and internationally?  Not in this country in a long time. 

Some news show was asking people if they felt better now and the reaction was mixed. 

My friend Tremonti, Italian Finance Minister said this:

"The intellectual capital of the category [of economists] has been canceled.  They did not understand what has happened, and now they look at the effects instead of the cause."  He used a famous sentence by Carl Schmitt against jurists who could not see Nazism coming, against the economists.  "Today I say: economists, be silent." 

Myers will get a kick out of that right Mike because Tremonti is nuts right? 





Edited by Michael Retour on 20 September 2008 at 10:43am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 20 September 2008 at 10:56am | IP Logged | 12  

 he's one of the masterminds behind the buildup to our incursion in Iraq. He can't be smart and cunning enough to do one and too dumb to understand the other.

He was not the mastermind behind the Iraq invasion, I have always said he is the puppet for Cheney.

I see them like this: Howdy Doodyhead

 

 

Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login