Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Keith Elder
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1973
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:07pm | IP Logged | 1  

Geoff:  It is not Affirmative Action to hire or promote a minority over a more qualified white applicant.  Its likely bad business, but its not Affirmative Action as it has been legally defined.  Recognizing that how do you reconcile the two statements?  Where does Affirmative Action policy require, mandate or imply that a less qualified person can be hired or promoted over a more qualified person? 

What real-world effect would affirmative action have, if not to bias the hiring process in regards to race?
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:16pm | IP Logged | 2  

Evening the bias that already was in place, Keith. 

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Keith Elder
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1973
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:19pm | IP Logged | 3  

On a side note...

www.intrade.com is a futures wagering site.  A couple weeks ago they had McCain shares @42.0, Obama @57. 

I just made a COOL $40 investing in McCain stock... he's risen to about 50.0 now (even with Obama), but I think it'll probably drop down a few points in the next week.

The trick is not to predict who will win the election, but to predict who other people are currently predicting.

(I also lost $40 predicting hurricane Ike will hit Louisiana...)

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Daniel Presedo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 199
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:21pm | IP Logged | 4  

Oh Al, I did not post anything more or less controversial, irrelevant than you have - so are you troll?

>>Oh, other than adding * vile JBF* to the "you just might be a liberal."<< Ummm yeah like I stated, thought it was funny, forgot it is a one way street here.

Boo hoo and I don't care if you do not believe me Geoff, my opposition to Hawkings AA comment would be <for him> to walk a mile in my shoes.

>>Refute what you want by providing your opposition...<<
Refute my own posts that is just silly and time = money.

The fact that I can look at that list and laugh and you can't is just how different we are. I look at a lot of posts/links here and laugh, it's the healthy thing to do.

Sorry to disappoint you yet again.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Keith Elder
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1973
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:26pm | IP Logged | 5  

Mike:  Evening the bias that already was in place, Keith.

So affirmative action means always hiring the best candidate, regardless of race?  That's the only way to eliminate bias.

That may be the goal, but it's not how affirmative action is often implemented.  My understanding, and I've seen examples of this, is that affirmative action goes beyond simply stating that you may not have a negative bias against a protected minority.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:27pm | IP Logged | 6  

"Refute what you want by providing your opposition... You have to do more work than saying - straw man. "

More work? Like what, post a string of half-assed straw man arguments that somebody else wrote, change a words to direct it at "us liberals" in the JBF, step down like some weak-kneed little mama's boy when somebody asks you to defend the positions in it, and then go "Let's you and him fight"?

That kind of work? Why bother? When you stepped down off that statement, you lost your argument.



Edited by Knut Robert Knutsen on 10 September 2008 at 1:29pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:28pm | IP Logged | 7  

What real-world effect would affirmative action have, if not to bias the hiring process in regards to race?

Its not a bias policy it is an access policy.  There was never any real threat for more qualified individuals.  Race, gender, etc, were not to be determinative factors but simply factors to be considered.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mark McKay
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2296
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:29pm | IP Logged | 8  

I felt that when Obama made the comment, his audience definitely made the
connection in their minds right away, judging from the response.

••

Group mind reading, at a distance, thru time! Kreskin's got nuthin on you!



I know, I was amazed at myself!

Seriously, though, when I saw the clip repeated, ad nauseum, that's what I thought. I didn't say I was right! But the minute he says lipstick, and pauses, you can see the faces in the crowd acknowledge, and then laugh. That's why I thoughts what I thoughts.

The fact that I'm still talking about this is very sad, though...
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:29pm | IP Logged | 9  

Sorry to disappoint you yet again.

Still not disappointed.  Rock on.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:32pm | IP Logged | 10  

 Daniel Presedo wrote:
Refute my own posts that is just silly and time =
money.


By direct implication, then (and as Geoff already pointed out), you believe
and stand by everything Hawkins says.

So, it wasn't so much something you posted because you thought it would
be funny. It was more of a policy statement on who Daniel Presedo is.

Excellent to know.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 135309
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:36pm | IP Logged | 11  

It was more of a policy statement on who Daniel Presedo is.


••

The Pope?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Daniel Presedo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 199
Posted: 10 September 2008 at 1:38pm | IP Logged | 12  

Yes, more work Robert = you lose.

You are such a man when you insult people. Feel better now.

Hardy har har

>>That's just silly<< = Monthy Python, geez you folks are slow.

>>By direct implication, then (and as Geoff already pointed out), you believe and stand by everything Hawkins says.<<
Nope that is why I added hardy har har universal WB cartoon for humor, but not universal to this thread.

Dammit Al, now I have to reply - Yeah Al time = money - eg you know work, pay the mortage and the kids college.


Edited by Daniel Presedo on 10 September 2008 at 1:45pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login