| Author |
|
Keith Elder Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1973
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 12:31pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
Mike, I disagree about the causes of the last few lost elections; I think the left spews far more vile than the right (see this thread), and it turns the moderates away, costing elections that the Dems would normally win. But I admit that's mostly a gut feeling; we can't know for sure, so it's probably pointless to argue.
Dave:Keith, I think there are problems with your argument about abortion
being "killing" and immoral. Executing criminals is also killing, state
sanctioned killing, so it should be "immoral" too, given the
constraints of your argument. Do you agree, because many pro-lifers are
also pro- death penalty, which seems inconsitent to me? It defeats the
idea of intellectual consitency completely. If abortion is ever banned,
I hope there are provisions included that would allow for humane
abortions in cases of rape and incest, at the least, because, that is
just a continuation of a crime against women that I would not be able
to support at all. [i[ I didn't actually say abortion was killing; I just said if it was killing, disallowing it in cases of rape would be consistent reasoning. Personally, I'm not sure when the fetus should be given human rights; I think the moment of conception is too early, but birth is far too late. I'd probably err on the side of caution, but it would be hard to justify banning abortion in the first few weeks, when pregnancies regularly self-abort. Regardless, whenever you do believe it acquires the status of 'human', after that point it shouldn't be killed because of the crime of it's father.
I don't think the anti-abortion, pro-death penalty stance is any more self-contradictory than the pro-abortion, anti-death penalty stances. The arguments around criminals and fetuses are entirely different... criminals are human, no doubt, and guilty; the question is whether they deserve death. Fetuses don't deserve death, but the question is at what point they are truly human. I don't think the issues relate.
Edited by Keith Elder on 09 September 2008 at 12:33pm
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Keith Elder Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1973
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 12:36pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Michael: I'll take this over what Mike O'Brien called false civility any day of the week.
But true civility trumps both.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Dave Pruitt Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6184
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 12:45pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
They have to relate, because both are state sanctioned ending of life. Whether the debate centers on when people believe human life begins or not, it's hard to argue that a fetus is not alive. I think the fact that most people that have an opinion on these issues are for one and against the other makes them a good place to have a debate. .
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Mike O'Brien Byrne Robotics Member
Official JB Historian
Joined: 18 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 10927
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 12:53pm | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
Keith, I'm basing my reasons on exit poll information - people coming home from the elections in 04 said the most important thing for them was "value issues" - coincidentally, in key states, "gay marriage" was put on the ballot, and those states, with "values" exit polls, swung hard to the right.
I understand your "gut feeling" comment - it's like how, a few hundred pages earlier, it was pointed out that we don't see our side's media bias - I don't see the left being that savage in their attacks, but I do see it on the right - and using the same logic you're using, my formula says the public DOES respond to the attacks. Etc.
So, it's a matter of perception, I suppose.
Step back from this a moment - look at it with different eyes - sure, things have been rough for Pailin, because people generally don't like her (or love her, in the case of the Right) - was there this kind of vitriol, on this board, or in the media, for McCain?
This is specific to Pailin. It's not a left/right issue. It's not media bias or civility. People who like her LOVE her, and people who don't HATE her.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Keith Elder Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1973
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:05pm | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Mike: This is specific to Pailin. It's not a left/right issue. It's not
media bias or civility. People who like her LOVE her, and people who
don't HATE her.
And there's no doubt a type of positive reinforcement; the more the right likes her, the more the left hates her, and the more the left hates her, the more the right will like her.
Another factor is that this is about the only interesting thing that has happened to the election since Hillary conceded. As such, it's what everybody is focusing on and talking about. The effects, both pro and con, will fade slightly in the next few weeks.
I notice McCain got a big bump in the polls, but that really doesn't mean much. Most of it will settle back to previous levels.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Keith Elder Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1973
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:09pm | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
Dave: I think the fact that most people that have an opinion on these issues
are for one and against the other makes them a good place to have a
debate.
It's odd how the belief that both are wrong, or neither is wrong, are both minority beliefs, isn't it? The majority thinks one is ok and the other wrong, but just argue about the order.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Mike O'Brien Byrne Robotics Member
Official JB Historian
Joined: 18 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 10927
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:13pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
I agree with that. I can't help but wonder if Pailin was McCain's October Surprise, sprung early.
It's possible that the reveal of her background and character over the next few months will effect the election one way or the other.
Here's a key factor - all the elections going back to Regan have been won or lost thanks to the "value voters" - Regan supported them, won. Bush I kind of did, then didn't - won/lost. Dole didn't - lost. Bush did - won twice. McCain didn't - they said they were going to sit this one out, but then he picked Pailin, who does support them, and now they're back in.
Rove is right - they are the block to court.
But... my gut feeling is that we're in 1992 again. Economy is in the crapper, and religion aside, the general public does tend to vote with their stomache. Plus, the McCain/Pailin ticket is like the Bush/Quayle ticket - it kind of supports the fundementalists.... kind of... plus, add the economy woes, and the track record of recent republicans...
I don't know... I still feel very confident about Obama's chances. Plus? Erm, we have a few October suprises of our own.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Mike O'Brien Byrne Robotics Member
Official JB Historian
Joined: 18 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 10927
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:17pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Keith - about your other point - it's about passing judgement. You're saying - "I am passing the ultimate judgement - this person is fit to live, this person should be killed".
Funny how spiritual and/or religious people take a side in that, eh? I'm no expert, but I seem to recall a few things about "I am the Lord, your God, you shall have no other Gods before me", "judge not, lest ye be judged" and "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
But what do I know? I'm sure, considering how many various people contributed to that book, that there's a contradictory verse in Leviticus or something that says "Ignore all thoes other things, it's totally acceptable to pass the ultimate judgement and play God with your fellow humans."
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Scott Richards Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 22 September 2005 Posts: 1258
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:20pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Is proud know be on the same planet as William McCormick.
I'm proud (and happy) to be on the same planet as any one in the forum. The alternative would be to die a horrible death from either a lack of oxygen or the harsh environment or both.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Scott Richards Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 22 September 2005 Posts: 1258
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:27pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
For the October Surprise factor, in my opinion, the bigger threat is to Obama. McCain has campaigned to be President more than once. He's been a politician for years. Anything horrible in his closet would have come out ages ago.
Obama, on the other hand, is very new on the scene. He's never been under close observation as he is now. He's never had years and years of people digging into is past. There could be some very damaging things about him that haven't yet been made public.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Geoff Gibson Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 21 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 5744
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:35pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
I can respect, though disagree with, the pro-life movement for their view that life begins with conception and is sacred. But if life is sacred, is not all life sacred? Should not one who is pro-life also support the abolition of the death penalty? I've never gotten that disconnect.
As for the left or right spewing bile both do it well and in equal amounts. No one side is free of such a charge.
Edited by Geoff Gibson on 09 September 2008 at 1:40pm
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Geoff Gibson Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 21 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 5744
|
| Posted: 09 September 2008 at 1:50pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
Plunk!
"Ouch! Okay now who's the wise guy around here? Oh, Shit! Daaad! You never let me be fun and all judgmental!"
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
|
|