Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:11pm | IP Logged | 1  

Which is it?

On May 30th, Rush Limbaugh said he had heard a rumor that a tape exists of Michelle Obama using the word “Whitey” from the pulpit of Trinity United Church of Christ

 

or

 

Rush Limbaugh says a tape exists of Michelle Obama using the word “whitey” from the pulpit of Trinity United

 

Saying something exists when it doesn't is a lie. Saying you heard a rumor that something exists may not be a lie.

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:12pm | IP Logged | 2  

You do not have a right to medical care

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It's not a constitutional right but I believe it's illegal to deny emergency medical care.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5741
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:16pm | IP Logged | 3  

Christopher:

You're right my bad. I was thinking of non emergency care but thats not
clear from my post -- amend it to "You do not have a right to welfare"

Edited by Geoff Gibson on 12 June 2008 at 7:17pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14864
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:19pm | IP Logged | 4  

Saying something exists when it doesn't is a lie. Saying you heard a rumor that something exists may not be a lie.

---

But the latter could be considered repeating a lie. So I think the label works.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:25pm | IP Logged | 5  

So every new channel that reports that rumor is lying?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14864
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:27pm | IP Logged | 6  

So every new channel that reports that rumor is lying?

---

Nope. But they'd be repeating a lie. Hence LIE and not LIAR.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Myers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 December 2004
Posts: 831
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:31pm | IP Logged | 7  

So Scott, you have no problems at all with people grabbed from other countries and brought to American soil, given no due process, being tortured (maybe, who knows?) and held with little or no evidence and with no chance of ever proving their innocence or guilt, except in a military court which refuses the defense access to evidence?
_______________________

Neil, you've been reading too many posts by Al and Knut.  The fact is that such installations are NOT legally considered sovereign United States territory.  Even the recent decision admits that Guantanamo is not "technically" anything other than the sovereign possession of Cuba, ours only through treaty lease.  The Majority decision:

   (i) The Court does not question the Government's position that Cuba maintains sovereignty, in the legal and technical sense, over Guantanamo, but it does not accept the Government's premise that de jure sovereignty is the touchstone of habeas jurisdiction.

Based in part on the Eisentrager holding, the Government argued that Guantanamo is NOT sovereign U.S. territory...and the Majority agreed.  Where the current decision outstrips anything previous is in considering further the scope of application for the writ to include a de facto understanding not previously recognized (the Eisentrager holding stopped full at de jure recognition of sovereignty, despite a de facto presumption).

And, really, is that your understanding of Scott's comments?  Honestly?



"Since they have no rights under American law, why even bother keeping them alive? Just shoot them and get it over with. Their fault for living in a war zone and if some are innocent, too bad. Serves them right for not overthrowing Saddam when they should have."
____________

This is ridiculous.  More baseless extremism in a thread that can't seem to help indulging in the wildest of partisan bullshit.  You know, the funny thing is that I don't even necessarily agree with the handling of Guantanamo detainees by the Executive Branch...yet, you nuts don't have a legitimate fucking clue as to what you're arguing for OR against.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 7:31pm | IP Logged | 8  

That's not a lie. There is a rumor.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Gillmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1920
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 8:05pm | IP Logged | 9  

"LIE: Rush Limbaugh says a tape exists of Michelle Obama using the word “whitey” from the pulpit of Trinity United"

Actually, this part is a lie.  Rush doesn't say there is a tape.  He said that Larry Johnson says there is a tape.  I know Limbaugh is a boogy man to liberals, but isn't there enough to dislike about him without having to make crap up?

It's tough to take serious a web site made to fight rumors when they use items that are inaccurate.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Brown
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 9007
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 8:06pm | IP Logged | 10  

That's not a lie. There is a rumor.

*********************

Which is addressed here:  http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/notape

Back to Top profile | search
 
Neil Lindholm
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 January 2005
Location: China
Posts: 4946
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 8:11pm | IP Logged | 11  

You know what Mike? You are correct. By a single clause written eighty years ago, the area is technically under Cuban sovereignty. So, when Cuba demands that their laws are upheld and for the prisoners to be released for legal trial, I am sure the US government will support it and release them.

C'mon, it is a US base on foreign soil. On hostile foreign soil. The idea that it is not American soil is an abstract which they have exploited to allow them to ignore the US Constitution. I am sure that it is just a coincidence that they decided to build the prison there, outside of the laws of the US. Too scared to actually face a real court, they hide under legal quirks.

I am wondering if a child born in Guantanamo by a military person stationed there is an American citizen? Under the rules they have set up, he is not born in American soil and is therefore a Cuban? Does he have to apply to become an American or is it granted automatically?


Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 12 June 2008 at 8:14pm | IP Logged | 12  

 am wondering if a child born in Guantanamo by a military person stationed there is an American citizen?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The child is an American citizen.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login