Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 76 Next >>
Topic: Title Change: Spider-Man Thread (Now with New Costume) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 1:31pm | IP Logged | 1  

 Howard Mackie wrote:
Come on,guys, this is all just smoke and mirrors. Changes
come and go... mostly in the attempt to get a boost in
sales. In the end... and,eventually, there will be an
end...writers, edtiros,editors-in-chief leave. The
further the Spider-Man books drift away from the core
concept, the more satisfying the return.

I totally understand this.  Personally, I've been reading comics for 30 years and year 1 started with Spider-Man.  So I get the notion that things change.  I'm not against change in the sense that we get an appearance of change.  Spider-Man joins the Avengers.  I don't like it, don't think it's at all in character, but that's easy enough to revert back to the status quo. I hate this new costume (why Spider-Man needs metal spats and armbands, I'll never know), but the original will return, so I'll wait. But things like the marriage to boost sales under the pretext that the character will eventually return to status quo?  Well, it's been over two decades and he's still married.  I'd venture to say the marriage is the status quo and we may possibly never see a return to the regular MU of the Spider-Man many of us know and love.  Same can be said for all the "fate" BS JMS is shoveling on the character while at the same time saying he's not making any fundamental changes to his origin.  Seriously.  Does he believe the crap he's spewing?  It goes from an accidental radioactive spider bite to a Spider-God who has created many Spider-Men and Peter Parker being fated to be one of them. Yeah.  Right.  That's not fundamental and I'll bet you dollars to donuts that this is yet another change that becomes status quo.

So, although I understand the notion that "the more things change, the more they stay the same" or "just ride it out", I've been doing that for the past 15 years and nothing has reverted the character back to the status quo in an overall character sense in that time.  Nothing.  Am I in a rage about it?  No.  Am I upset about it?  Sure.  If I had seen just one instance of Peter Parker/Spider-Man recovering from all the crap that's been heaped on him, I'd agree that a "wait and see" mentality would be appropriate.  That I haven't seen evidence of that at all from Marvel suggests to me that they don't even know what status quo is for the character and, quite frankly, don't really care.  It's too bad that it seems I care more about this character than the company from which he sprang.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133318
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 1:39pm | IP Logged | 2  

There are two basic problems with the "just ride it out" notion.

First, there are several writers who have a stated "It doesn't matter what we do, they'll just change it anyway" approach -- which is very dangerous, considering we never know what will become carved in stone. (Would anyone really familiar with the character's history have expected Magneto to be transformed into a Jewish freedom fighter -- and stay that way??)

Second, there are the anal-retentive fanboys, who insist that every jot and tittle be forever maintained exactly as it is (except the ones they don't like), and the editors and writers, often fanboys themselves, who listen to them. These are also the same people who like to crow and gibber whenever some change is made to a change I made -- as if, after 30 years in this business, I would be foolish enough to assume anything I do is bulletproof!

Look at his history, and see Batman change his "shape" about every ten years --- before DARK KNIGHT. But how long has he been a psycho ninja, now?

Back to Top profile | search
 
James C. Taylor
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4705
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 1:55pm | IP Logged | 3  

 Jon Juzan wrote:
Yet you had to come back with "People at Newsarama are always in a rage. That's what they do." With that statement you're attempting to discredit my point for no other reason other than to be "obtuse".

I wasn't discrediting your point, Jon. I was insulting Newsarama. That was my reason.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:08pm | IP Logged | 4  

To be fair, Jon, when you mentioned people going into a rage, you did it in this thread with no specification that you weren't actually talking about people in this thread.  That Howard was addressing people specifically in this thread (not about rage, but his own comments about change) and that you replied to him suggested you were, in fact, talking about this forum and not Newsarama and/or other message boards.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:09pm | IP Logged | 5  

That's not fundamental and I'll bet you dollars to donuts that this is yet another change that becomes status quo.

****
The only thing is. it seems a lot of people dislike the totem mumbo jumbo.

The marriage? Believe that was Stan Lee's idea and while it ebbs and flows, I think there are as many a people who like it (since its all they know) then dislike it. maybe more

What is a spat? I keep seeing that used in reference to the new costume.

JQ says the biggest genie that can't be put in the bottle is being put back into the bottle end of this year. (and i think a smaller genie too)

Some have speculated the marriage-though JQ being coy says Pete is definitely not getting divorced. Think it is the marriage? and if not, what else could be a genie that big?

 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31172
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:12pm | IP Logged | 6  

Spat:

Although, they were part of formal men's wear back in the day.

 

 



Edited by Brian Miller on 02 February 2006 at 2:13pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:12pm | IP Logged | 7  

A genie that big could be secret identities across the board.  Make it so all superheroes secret identities are unknown to everyone but those closest to them but not to anyone walking into Avengers Tower seeing Peter with his mask off, or people who equate DD and Matt Murdock, or Tony Stark saying that, yes, at one time he was Iron Man, but not now, or Steve Rogers unmasking on live TV in front of millions.  Me, I'd back that genie going back into the bottle in a big way.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:18pm | IP Logged | 8  

That might be. Civil War is supposedly based on one faction which wants superheroes to register and unmask, and one that doesn't.

For some reason, Spider-man will be a pivotal figure in that choice.

So maybe something will happen and they will mindwipde everyone who knows anything-which would include putting the X guys and Xavier back under. That would fit in with some jokes Bendis/New Avengers has made about "Who doesn't know your identity." Maybe the heroes will fight enough to distrust each other and agree to let everyone forget about everybody-they'll be comrades but maybe not close friends anymore-in the sense of everyone knowing everything

Or maybe its someother genie, and in the process, another genie gets let out-Spidey unmasks ;)

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Jon Juzan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 696
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:29pm | IP Logged | 9  

To be fair, Jon, when you mentioned people going into a rage, you did it in this thread with no specification that you weren't actually talking about people in this thread. 
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------
 
I agree.  That was why I clarified myself when I said, "I didn't specify at this board, James" without being the least bit snarky.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31172
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:58pm | IP Logged | 10  

"I believe I can fly"

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 2:59pm | IP Logged | 11  

sigh
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31172
Posted: 02 February 2006 at 3:04pm | IP Logged | 12  

I guess he's the "Web-Glider" now instead of the "Web-Slinger"?
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 76 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login