Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 16 Next >>
Topic: The House of Other People’s Ideas (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
David Blot
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 August 2005
Location: France
Posts: 858
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 3:27pm | IP Logged | 1  

Flavio wrote : I think the Jemas/Quesada reign accomplished only one
good thing, which was moving away from the Image-era look that was
defacing Marvel. Comics in the nineties had been unspeakably ugly and
improved considerably when they moved in. Now, of course, the
pendulum has gone way too far and ^^***** covers and interior art are
duuuullll...

----

First of all Flavio I'm mostly agree with you. If people don't like Marvel
now, I'd love to hear what they had to say at the Maximum Carnage
crossover time - (but we've been there already). And TRUE there was a
period pre Jemas/Quesada and post Lee/Liefeld, where most of Marvel
main titles had correct artistic line ups, Avengers/PErez, Cap/Garney,
etc... not to mention DD by Quesada :)

And secondly, and more importantly, FLavio I love your avatar ! PENNY
CENTURY by JAIME HERNANDEZ - I recgonise it !

See, when you get upset about Marvel you just have to think of the
Hernandez Bros, and here you have creators who, like Alan Moore except
for his UK stuff, never ever worked at Marvel (Shooter or Quesada time
whatever), even if they were great fans of Lee/Ditko/Kirby.

Anyway, SPIDER-MAN by JAIME HERNANDEZ, that would be fun !


Back to Top profile | search
 
Flavio Sapha
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12912
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 3:40pm | IP Logged | 2  

Genius, David!
Los Bros would rock the webslinger!!!
Jaime would riff the pretty Romita stuff and Beto the quirky Ditko!

BTW, have you seen The Megalomaniacal Spider-Man, by Peter Bagge?
Pretty funny, a guilty pleasure of mine.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Flavio Sapha
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12912
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 3:44pm | IP Logged | 3  

2 people have asked about the avatar, so I'll post the original image, by
Jaime Hernandez, of Love and Rockets fame:



A true master of the human figure.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 3:45pm | IP Logged | 4  

" I think a big reason that we don't see a lot of new
characters from Marvel and DC is that (whether it's
likely or not) no one wants to create the next huge
multi-media superstar for his company and not get a
share of the licensing & merchandising profits that
the character generates."

So why aren't there more hits coming out independently? Hellboy and Bone came out in the early 90's.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mike Bunge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1335
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 3:50pm | IP Logged | 5  

"It was he who fine tuned the plot-pencils-script approach, with the "plot" being sometimes only a few words -- the legendary plot for the first Galactus trilogy: "Have them fight God" -- and placed himself in the position of putting the finishing polish on the stories that were mostly assembled by the artists. Often, this meant going in a whole different direction from what the artist intended (as with the "Him" saga in FF), but the art was there first, which means the stories were always artist driven.

It was that simple thing which made Marvel so very different from -- and superior to -- the books DC was producing at the same time, most of which were editor-driven."

It's interesting to compare those artist driven stories to today's decompressed books, which are very visually oriented but all those visuals are often specifically dictated by the writer.  Then, "artist driven" meant dynamic images that strongly flowed from panel to panel.  Today, writer-dictated "artist driven" books are all about how pretty the individual panels are.

Mike

Back to Top profile | search
 
Flavio Sapha
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12912
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 3:55pm | IP Logged | 6  

...and now we return to the "Don't Think Visually Show"!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Flavio Sapha
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12912
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 4:08pm | IP Logged | 7  

Lately, I've been thinking that a big part of the problem originated at
Vertigo. I mean, circa 1986 the Comics aren't just for kids anymore
slogan marked the release of stuff such as MOS, LEGENDS, DKR, MAUS,
WATCHMEN, SWAMP THING, etc. Part of these, notably, JB's stuff, was all-
ages, but part was not, was actually aimed at older readers (QUESTION,
GREEN ARROW, SANDMAN). This wave of comics -most of which carried a
SUGGESTED FOR MATURE READERS label- culminated in the creation of
the Vertigo imprint. At the time, it was referred to as the "British
Invasion", because you had Grant Morrison, Neil Gaiman and, later, Mark
Millar, doing comics in the Alan Moore style - writer-driven!

Meanwhile, Marvel was going in the opposite direction, giving rope to the
"artists" who became the Image boys. All storytelling dies at dawn! Page
after page of pin-ups!

With the speculator implosion, it seems that the Vertigo school is on top
nowadays, but what worked for quirky, obscure characters aimed at older
audiences should never have been applied to the mainstream heroes.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike Bunge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1335
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 4:17pm | IP Logged | 8  

"With the speculator implosion, it seems that the Vertigo school is on top
nowadays, but what worked for quirky, obscure characters aimed at older
audiences should never have been applied to the mainstream heroes."

How well did the Vertigo school ever work, commercially that is?  It seems to me that the history of Vertigo has had one no-question-about-it mainstream success - Gaiman's SANDMAN.  All of Vertigo's other "hits" have really only been successful on a smaller scale.  And that includes the trades sales of Vertigo product.  If Warren Ellis (for example) was making a lot of money from TRANSMETROPOLITAN trades, what in the world is he doing back at M****l doing work-for-hire?

I'm not criticizing Vertigo-type work or the people who like it.  But it hasn't, by-and-large, demonstrated a commercial appeal that equals or surpasses super-heroes or other genres of the past.  Yet the immense critical acclaim that Vertigo has won, seems to have given that style a disproportionate influence over the entire comic industry.

Mike

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 530
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 4:29pm | IP Logged | 9  

" I'm reminded of an instance that Mark Waid talked about. He has said that then-Marvel EIC Bob Harras told him that "We consider writer-driven comics as an experiment that's failed. "

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No.  At first Waid did not name the assistant editor who told him that.  Later he claimed it was X-book assistant editor Jason Liebig.  Liebig denied the story, though admittedly with a name like that he faces an uphill battle in any dispute over an unverifiable fact.

No one has ever claimed that Bob Harras made that statement.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Larry Bonds
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 227
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 4:46pm | IP Logged | 10  

Everyone wants to make a splash.  Al ot of 'professionals' in the field want to write a screenplay as opposed to a comic.  Look at the first couple of story arcs in ASTONISHING X-MEN and NEW AVENGERS. There is no way humanly possible for those stories to have taken 6 issues to tell! Stan and anyone could have told it in 1 or 2 issues - tops! Everyone wants to be the next Moore, Miller, Simonson, Byrne, Claremont, Lee, Kirby...etc and they think by doing the next big thing that they can

a) stretch out the story and sell more books

b) become canonized in comic history

and it just ain't working.  A way to fix it is for M***** and DC to look at the past...then forget it.  Try to get a 'feel for the characters and do a WWPPD? (What would Peter Parker do? for example.)  Think back to what made the characters great in the first place and embellish that. Stay within the confines of the character.  Another thing they can do is to restore continuity within the universes.  For Joe Q. to "ignore continuity in favor of good storytelling" is ridiculous especially when we the fans aren't getting good storytelling.  The reason I stopped reading M***** was Magneto destroys Manhattan. The event is totally ignored by the rest of the M***** universe!!! Un-fucking-believable!  Unfortunately, I think we may be too far gone for this to be fixed.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Steve Jones
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 548
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 4:48pm | IP Logged | 11  

Underlying all these arguments that criticise the Marvel of today is a contradiction. We want originality but we want the same as went before - we want Spider-man to stay the same (some even argue he should be 16 forever) but we want new and dynamic stories. I don't think you can have both. If you want Marvel to be a House of Ideas then you have to take the good with the bad, you need a Marvel willing to take chances, not all of which will succeed. Since Jemas left and Marvel has become more successful and profitable it has become more conservative.

Lee, Kirby and Ditko took chances - they didn't worry about being true to the characters, or respecting the genre, or making sure the toys were all back in the box when they finished, they made great comics.

edited: remove possible spoiler ...



Edited by Steve Jones on 29 November 2005 at 4:49pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 29 November 2005 at 4:52pm | IP Logged | 12  

Lee, Kirby and Ditko didn't worry, because they created the toys in the first place.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 16 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login