Thomas, you're debating from the "either/or" camp.  I never said that people couldn't enjoy both WATCHMEN and FF.  Don't put words in my mouth or add to my debate something I never said. 

JJJ's reaction to Spider-Man isn't the same as people in the MU saying the man who puts on a Spider-costume is "more crazy" than them.  JJJ has a very personal vendetta against Spider-Man, and he also wants to sell newspapers.  That's totally different than showing the populace of a mainstream superhero world thinking anyone who dons a costume is crazy. In other words, I think it's totally cool to examine the genre in a comic divorced from mainstream superheroes, but the instant a fan asks that it be examined in the MU or DCU proper (asking any of a number of questions like "why don't the Gotham police arrest Batman", or "just how many times can Spider-Man fight the Green Goblin", or "shouldn't the normal people of these universes think every costumed hero is just a little bit crazy?") then I think it's time for them to move on to other forms of entertainment and leave mainstream superhero comics to those who love them for what they are, not demanding from them what they aren't.
********************************************************** *******************
I'm sorry if I put words in your mouth. You expressed the opinion that an individual who enjoys a comic book in which bystanders believe that anyone willing to put on a costume, and fight crime is crazy should move on to other things (I'm assuming this means genres, artistic mediums, or/ and "do something worthwhile with your life rather than debate comic books on internet forums.") I responded that readers are capable of enjoying both that type of story and more traditional superhero stories.

I kind of got the impression that the Comedian was supposed to be synonymous with "the man."  He was an example of all the things wrong with that society, hence the reason he took a nose dive from a high rise at the hands of someone trying to fix things.

I for one never identified with the Comedian.  Why would I?  He's nothing like most of the heroes in the book, nor is he like anyone I care about in the real world.  He was a sadistic bastard who killed a woman pregnant with his child.  Do you really think Moore wanted us to identify with him?

I would agree that we weren't supposed to identify with him.  Just because he's the first one we're introduced to, and the catalyst for unravelling the mystery doesn't mean that he's someone we should feel empathetic toward.  In fact, the only part of the book where he's at all even human is when he comes to realize that his world is crumbling and, without a face to hit, he's scared.  Still, I felt more pity toward him than anything else, even then.