Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 26 Next >>
Topic: Big Watchmen write-up in EW (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jason Schulman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2473
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:07pm | IP Logged | 1  

Watchmen is certainly pessimistic, but I'd hardly call it cynical; Nite Owl and Silk Spectre are certainly human and perhaps even heroic in their own way.  I never had any problem with the Kitty Genovese reference (it's a real world event and Moore obviously meant no disrespect by it); and as I recall Rorshach didn't go utterly nuts until he confronted the guy who fed the girl he kidnapped to his dogs. (Rorshach was certainly the first truly convincing nutcase in comics).
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Mets
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 898
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:10pm | IP Logged | 2  

WATCHMEN wasn't even the best comic book of 1987
********************************************************** *****************
1987 was a very good year for comics.

Watchmen
Maus
Batman- Year One

Using this as a criticism doesn't work as well. It's like arguing that Chinatown's not great because the  Godfather Part 2 was better, or Stagecoach isn't great because Gone With the Wind was better.
(1939, and 1974- Very good years for movies.)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jon Godson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 January 2005
Posts: 2468
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 3  

What bothers me about the matter is how many Time readers will chose
Watchmen for their first comic experience and will walk away thinking that it
is typical for the medium.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Darragh Greene
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1812
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:14pm | IP Logged | 4  

'Postmodernism' was first coined by the French cultural theorist Jean-
Francois Lyotard. I don't recommend anyone here searches for a rational
or consistent definition of just what he means by it because he's built an
entire career on keeping the term indefinable and ambiguous.

More sober critics have tried to rehabilitate the term by tying its
referential extension down somewhat better, and one of the best of these
would be Umberto Eco's description of the postmodern as a revisiting of
the past with irony.

There are different types of irony, of course, and that's where the
difference between 1961's FF and 1986's Watchmen lies; it's in
the tone. FF turns the conventions of traditional DC superheroics on
their head by humanising the heroes whereas Watchmen turns the
Marvel conventions on their head by dehumanising the heroes. The irony
of FF is critical and authentic while the irony of Watchmen is
parodic and sarcastic.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Mets
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 898
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:19pm | IP Logged | 5  

That was all part of Moore's misunderstanding of superheroes. He's one
of those people who believe that you'd have to be crazy in order to want
to dress up in a colorful costume and fight crime.
********************************************************** ***
2 points.
1. If someone got into a colorful costume, and started fighting gangsters, pimps, and mobsters, you'd think he's more likely to be crazy than the average individual.
2. I don't recall the two Nite Owls being crazy.



Ah, but which is the first domino?

What you may not be taking into account is this: as I note above, I read WATCHMEN up thru issue 5 in xerox form, as the books were coming into the DC offices. I was working on Superman, then, and Frank was hard at work on DKR. He was also seeing those xeroxes.

Now, if you look at DKR with this in mind, you may notice something (something of which I was very much aware at the time): DKR is the first half of one story, and the second half of another. Right down the middle is a line, which splits of the story Frank started, and introduces the story he completed. And that story, the second one, was heavily influenced by what he read in WATCHMEN.

Example? DKR opens with Bruce Wayne and Jim Gordon sharing a drink as a newscaster on the TV wonders whatever happened to Batman and hopes that, wherever he is, he is sharing a drink with a friend. But by halfway thru we all know what happened to Batman -- he and all other superheroes were banned, outlawed, just as they were in WATCHMEN. There's no reason for that newscaster to be wondering whatever happened to Batman. Everybody knows.

So, yeah, DKR (or, rather, people misreading it, even to this day) can take a big mea culpa for much of the mess the industry is in today, but without WATCHMEN, I very much doubt that would have been the case.
********************************************************** ********************
That's something I didn't know about before, and am really glad I read.


You're....lumping in Barry Ween with the rest of those books? Seriously?
********************************************************** **************
I really like Barry Ween. It's my favorite comic book published while I've been reading comics (the last ten, or so years), especially the last issue of the Monkey Tales series. It's the funniest comic book I've ever read, and it's the one I'd show to people who have never read comics before (provided they wouldn't be put off by the cruder elements).


Edited by Thomas Mets on 23 October 2005 at 12:25pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jason Schulman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2473
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:19pm | IP Logged | 6  

It's better to use the term "revisionist superheroes" when discussing Watchmen, Dark Knight, The One, etc.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Darragh Greene
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1812
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:23pm | IP Logged | 7  

Revisionism is precisely a symptom or effect of postmodernism. (I hate
isms.)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36181
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:29pm | IP Logged | 8  

 Thomas Mets wrote:
1. If someone got into a colorful costume, and started fighting gangsters, pimps, and mobsters, you'd think he's more likely to be crazy than the average individual.

Not if I'm reading a superhero comic.  That's the suspension/acceptance one must have of their disbelief if they are to enjoy superhero comics.  Once you start injecting what we in the real world would think about a guy in a Bat-suit or a Spider-costume running around town, you've pretty much pegged yourself as someone who should move on to other things.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jon Godson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 January 2005
Posts: 2468
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:32pm | IP Logged | 9  

Watchmen, The One, Maximortal, Brat Pack, Enigma (which should have been
on the Time list instead of Watchmen - highly underrated), John
Constantine, Sandman, Promethea, etc. are characters designed for a darker
view, and get a pass for corrupting the tone of mainstream Super-Hero
comics.

Batman/The Dark Knight, Shade the Changing Man, Doom Patrol, Animal
Man, and others like them should have been - and, in the future, should be
- off-limits.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Mets
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 898
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:36pm | IP Logged | 10  

What bothers me about the matter is how many Time readers will chose
Watchmen for their first comic experience and will walk away thinking that it
is typical for the medium.
********************************************************** ************************
What single "graphic novel" would be typical for the medium?

Calling "Maus" a work of fiction would be very controversial.
Frank Miller's Batman stories would probably get more opposotion, and as Mr. Byrne pointed out, they're influenced by Watchmen.
I'm not sure that there's a single "novel" length Lee-Kirby Fantastic 4 story, and Mister Byrne's "The trial of Galactus" is out of print.
"The Dark Phoenix Saga" provides payoff to years worth of storylines, so it certainly wouldn't qualify as a novel.
"The Life & Times of Uncle Scrooge" was just released in TPB form within the last few months.
"A Contract With God" is more an anthology than a single novel.
"Preacher" is fun of hell, but makes Watchmen look clean. It's also a series of graphic novels. The same could be said of Alan Moore's Swamp Thing, and Neil Gaiman's Sandman.
* edit- "Enigma" was great, but it's even more obscure than Watchmen, so I can't really expect the editors of Watchmen to be familiar with it, much less pick it over Watchmen. In addition, if Enigma appeared on the list, there'd be (unfair) criticisms about a gay love story representing every comic book.



Edited by Thomas Mets on 23 October 2005 at 12:41pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Flavio Sapha
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12912
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:38pm | IP Logged | 11  

I still don't get this "corrupting" thing.

As the song goes, why can't we have "the Kinsey Report sitting next to
Love Story"?

Where were the editors who dilligently pasted Murphy Anderson's heads
over Jack Kirby's art while this "corruption" was going on?   
Back to Top profile | search
 
Darragh Greene
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1812
Posted: 23 October 2005 at 12:39pm | IP Logged | 12  

Jon, Promethea doesn't offer a dark view; it's thoroughly humanist in
its message, so it's precisely the opposite of Moore's soulless productions
of the '80s.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 26 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login