Posted: 12 December 2024 at 7:03pm | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
The Punisher is a very different kettle of fish to Batman.
It's long been a standard aspect of Batman (and with superheroes in general) that he solves crimes, foils bank robbers, muggers, etc... and then hands them over to the police.
As much as the Bugle editorial made mileage out of Spider-Man's supposed vigilantism, the reality is that Spider-Man would also do basically the same as Batman, leaving the vanquished foe webbed to a lamp-post with a note for the cops. This is different to the Punisher, who actively seeks to mete out punishment to criminals at his own hands.
In Miller's take in DKR, Batman was shifted a little into Punisher territory ("There are seven working defense from this. Three of them disarm with minimal contact. Three of them kill. The other -- HURTS"), but crucially DKR was supposed to exist outside of proper continuity and Batman still ultimately maintained his own code of no killing (though you can interpret a few bits in DKR a different way) and was aiming to hand over criminals to the authorities.
Superheroes also tend to fight supervillains. I think a reader would really have to do some work to start translating this into real life vigilantism. I'd contend for a lot of classic super hero tales the most likely takeaway would be an upstanding set of morals. Crime always pays, try to the do right thing even in difficult circumstances, etc.
|