If you want more of the same and 10X worse just go to the comments section on any article on OANN or Fox. More nuts than a fruitcake.

Attacking her based on intellect is a puzzling tactic when she's running against the most fundamentally ignorant person ever nominated for President by a major party.  What's next, criticizing her for having funny-looking hair? 

Harris has a Juris Doctor in Law (not unusual for a Lawyer), also has a degree in Economics and Political Science.

Trump, on the other hand has a BS in Economics and his college was threatened with legal action if they ever released his records. Also, he passed a cognitive test where he had to identify a camel and brags about it like he aced the Putnam.  Due to his connections with MIT, I'm sure he'd get a good score, though.

Edited to add:  Speaking of intellectual capacity, I am all over a Kamala Harris/Mark Kelly ticket.  JD Vance isn't qualified to shine Mark Kelly's shoes.

1. The RNC just wasted time and money on their convention bashing Biden.

2. All that "Lets Go Brandon" apparel and merchandise out there unsold is now worthless junk. (It was already garbage.)

3. They can't make `F*ck Harris' signs and shirts, because it will look like anyone sporting it wants to have sex with her.

I remember an early tweet by the orange guy that referenced the “marine core.”  These days everyone is a perfect speller, thanks to technology, and it’s becoming harder to spot the smarter folk based on their writing. But homophones can be a canary in the dumbass coal mine. 

Trump thought it was the marine core.  And he was a president.  

Is it possible it was a speech to text misfire? Sure. But given a whole mound of similar evidence, I think it more likely indicates he’s not that bright.  

There's much better evidence of Trump's limited intellectual capacities than a spelling error.  Here's some information directly from those around him about his poor attention span, difficulty comprehending and retaining information, and general ignorance of basic governmental/political facts that should be known by any President.  The article is seven years old, and it's unlikely his capabilities have improved in the interim, particularly given his advanced age and family history of dementia.

As I said, criticizing Harris' intellect in this context is downright bizarre.