Author |
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133715
|
Posted: 05 August 2024 at 4:42pm | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
Maybe RFKjr wants everyone to start calling him “Teddy”.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Richard Stevens Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 May 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1958
|
Posted: 05 August 2024 at 4:55pm | IP Logged | 2
|
post reply
|
|
He wants to send people on antidepressants to work camps and takes selfies with roadkill. How is he even allowed in polite society?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Brian Miller Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 July 2004 Location: United States Posts: 31329
|
Posted: 05 August 2024 at 4:57pm | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
What fucking bicycle is gonna kill a bear when it runs over it?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Brian Miller Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 July 2004 Location: United States Posts: 31329
|
Posted: 05 August 2024 at 4:58pm | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
Not to mention he sits down with Rosanne Barr to unburden himself.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jason Czeskleba Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 30 April 2004 Posts: 4649
|
Posted: 05 August 2024 at 6:36pm | IP Logged | 5
|
post reply
|
|
Steven Queen wrote:
There's no candidate you'll agree with 100%. |
|
|
Yes there is: you. I would imagine you agree 100% with yourself, so write your own name down on the ballot. If you're going to vote for someone who has no chance of winning, why not select the one person you completely agree with about everything? Why settle for half-measures?
Because yes, Kennedy cannot win. That's not propaganda, that's realism. He's polling at 5%. And historically, no third-party candidate has ever come close to winning a Presidential election. Even the best-qualified one (TR) only managed to act as a spoiler, losing by a decisive margin. The US system of electing Presidents is not set up to accommodate multiple parties. It's set up as a two-party system.
So your choice is to vote for someone who has a chance of winning and contribute to making a difference, or vote for someone who has no chance, the functional equivalent of not voting at all.
Kennedy himself does have some admirable positions on some issues. But he also espouses dangerous crackpot pseudo-science about vaccination, in the process facilitating the spread of disease and ignorance. I don't know if he's actually crazy (as in truly believing that stuff) or simply a cynical opportunist. But that issue alone speaks to his unfitness for office, in my opinion.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
David Miller Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Posts: 3121
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 4:34am | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
I give Kennedy credit for being entertaining. I laughed as much following the dead bear story over the past two days as I did at Deadpool vs Wolverine.
The other bright spot to Kennedy's candidacy has been the exposure and ridicule of his more discreditable beliefs. Hopefully his destiny is to remain the Pure Comedy Candidate I initially mistook Trump for in 2015, and not to throw the election to Trump.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
Athanasios Kollias Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 27 September 2021 Location: Greece Posts: 303
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 5:32am | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
As an outsider, I really see little difference between Trump and RFK Jr. Trump is so over the top ridiculous and bordering on batshit crazy that I just don't get how he can possibly be the number one candidate according to polls. I wouldn't ride a car with him driving, let alone handing him the fate of the planet...
How a wonderful nation of 400+ million people ended up with Trump and Biden (and eventually Harris) as the alternatives for Presidency is simply beyond me...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Brian ONeill Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 July 2024 Posts: 54
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 7:52am | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
If the country had 400 million voters, we wouldn't be in this mess.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Kevin Brown Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 31 May 2005 Location: United States Posts: 9034
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 9:39am | IP Logged | 9
|
post reply
|
|
If the country had 400 million voters, we wouldn't be in this mess.
******************* The US doesn't even have 400 million people, it "only" has about 333 million and only about 160 million registered voters.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Athanasios Kollias Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 27 September 2021 Location: Greece Posts: 303
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 12:43pm | IP Logged | 10
|
post reply
|
|
My bad, I must have caught a glimpse of some future projections an got confused.The point remains though. And, Brian and Kevin, I am not talking about who the voters vote, but the fact your system needs 2 candidates out of 333 M people and ends up with a couple of geriatrics potential residents with dementia.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133715
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 1:20pm | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
That is not, in fact, where we “end up”.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mark Haslett Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 19 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6551
|
Posted: 06 August 2024 at 5:48pm | IP Logged | 12
|
post reply
|
|
The ascendency of Authoritarian populists has a lot to do with unfinished- business in a country’s history and a lot of people unwilling to recognize the darker side of what they think they want.
In the US, it’s mostly about racism.
Why was the 2020 race between two very old men? One was the face of autocracy, and one was the comforting antidote.
4 years later… they remained the leaders of the 2 parties, but they are both 4 years older.
It’s not that mysterious.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|