Author |
|
Mark Haslett Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/avatars/jbf_default_avatar.png)
Joined: 19 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6395
|
Posted: 17 September 2023 at 6:34pm | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
X-Men Elsewhen made use of Dark Phoenix as a bad-guy who could come back. Did you get a sense of whether or not this would be a character you'd want to see return as often as the average member of the X-Men's rogue's gallery?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133196
|
Posted: 17 September 2023 at 7:28pm | IP Logged | 2
|
post reply
|
|
That was our original plan.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mark Haslett Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/avatars/jbf_default_avatar.png)
Joined: 19 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6395
|
Posted: 17 September 2023 at 8:03pm | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
I had heard that, and it was amazing to see in Elsewhen- twice!
I guess what I was really trying to ask is if you had a sense for how many issues would have to go by before you could imagine bringing Dark Phoenix back again?
I sometimes get the feeling that I’ve really got a good question to ask you here, then I ask it and find out I haven’t formulated the question to get anything like the answer I thought I’d get. I end up wondering what made me think it was such a great topic to begin with?
Thanks for the response!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133196
|
Posted: 17 September 2023 at 8:37pm | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
I guess what I was really trying to ask is if you had a sense for how many issues would have to go by before you could imagine bringing Dark Phoenix back again?••• Chris was champing at the bit immediately, so not long.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Michael Penn Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://images.byrnerobotics.com/forum/uploads/MichaelPenn/2015-07-20_074348_images.jpeg)
Joined: 12 April 2006 Location: United States Posts: 12683
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 12:13am | IP Logged | 5
|
post reply
|
|
Would Dark Phoenix have ever returned independent of Jean Grey (i.e., by "possessing," or whatever the word would be, others in the future)?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133196
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 12:23am | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
At that point Dark Phoenix and Jean Grey were one person. The idea of Phoenix possessing Jean was suggested by Kurt Busiek after her death. Not sure we’d have got there on the original course.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Rodrigo castellanos Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/avatars/jbf_default_avatar.png)
Joined: 03 July 2012 Location: Uruguay Posts: 1508
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 1:29am | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
At that point Dark Phoenix and Jean Grey were one person.
That was always my interpretation as well.
Guess that's why I never clicked with the possession thing, which has been the default since, I believe. (Admit to not following X-stuff closely in the past couple of decades)
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133196
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 9:38am | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
Read closely, and you’ll find Chris was already writing Jean/Phoenix as separate entities even before Dark Phoenix was introduced. Not sure he was even aware he was doing it.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Michael Penn Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://images.byrnerobotics.com/forum/uploads/MichaelPenn/2015-07-20_074348_images.jpeg)
Joined: 12 April 2006 Location: United States Posts: 12683
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 11:26am | IP Logged | 9
|
post reply
|
|
Precisely because of Mr. Claremont's writing I had from the beginning thought that Jean Grey had been taken over by whatever "Phoenix" was, using her as a host-body in some deep, dreadful way, a terrible cosmic-human symbiosis, so to speak. I did not think of Jean Grey having been transformed into "Phoenix" in the way that Sue Storm had been transformed in The Invisible Girl.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
ron bailey Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/avatars/jbf_default_avatar.png)
Joined: 16 October 2016 Location: United States Posts: 1035
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 2:11pm | IP Logged | 10
|
post reply
|
|
I erroneously assumed at the time that it was Mastermind's influence gone irrevocably wrong, beyond what he meant to do to Jean, like a Pandora's box.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133196
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 2:35pm | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
At the time, that was the plan.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Michael Penn Byrne Robotics Member
![Avatar](http://images.byrnerobotics.com/forum/uploads/MichaelPenn/2015-07-20_074348_images.jpeg)
Joined: 12 April 2006 Location: United States Posts: 12683
|
Posted: 18 September 2023 at 2:57pm | IP Logged | 12
|
post reply
|
|
Mastermind manipulating Marvel Girl ultimately beyond his control and unleashing the fiercest version of her telekinetic/telepathic powers (the latter of which might've defeated Juggernaut single-handedly back in #46) sounds like a great John Byrne story.
But working through this space-creature-amalgam Jean Grey/Phoenix thing, that's soooooo Chris Claremont's "X-Men." I'm certainly not disparaging the work in any way or denying that it (rightly) became legendary, with immense credit due to Mr. Claremont. Just personally wishing, oh, it had all been more traditional X-Men stories.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|