Author |
|
George Atlas Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 26 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 291
|
Posted: 25 April 2005 at 10:38pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
Chris Rayman wrote:
To me, the "graphic" portion denotes art or
pictures in addition to (or instead of) the text; meaning a "novel"
with graphics.
I could be wrong but most novels are produced as original works,
rather than reprints of previously serialized installments. If
they are, I'm pretty sure they're the exception, rather than the rule. |
|
|
What I'm trying to get at is that what characterizes a novel ("graphic"
or no) is that it is a distinct and coherent unit, with a distinct
beginning and end. In contrast, most comic books do not form
graphic novels. Instead, they are ongoing serial works.
Would you call Maus one graphic novel or two? I'd call it one graphic novel in two volumes.
Watchmen was conceived as a unitary whole, composed of a dozen
chapters, each of which was published in comic book form as it was
created. The whole was subsequently collected in one volume.
(Of course, the subtle distinctions you and I are hashing out would be
completely lost on most "civilians." One of the nice things about
this forum--good, smart conversation on this sort of minutia.)
Edited by George Atlas on 25 April 2005 at 10:39pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Melissa Ashton Byrne Robotics Member
Nudge
Joined: 15 April 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 1379
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 12:34am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Glenn Brown wrote:
John, you cannot possibly be that ignorant to believe that people who use racial slurs do so without any negative intent or connotation. If you do indeed believe that, I strongly encourage you to seek some counsel and educate yourself on the matter, if you don't want to take my word for it. I've only been black and lived in this country for, oh, my entire life, so I may not be aware of how things really are out there... |
|
|
I don't ask this meaning any disrespect at all, but Glenn, are you honestly unaware that the word IS used quite a bit without any intended racist slur?
It reminds me a lot of the words "fag", "dyke", and "poof". All derogatory terms that can be used with a great deal of spite and malice, but which can also be used without such malice, often by the very people they are used against.
When I check the soundtrack of Any Given Sunday, track 11 is "My Niggas" by DMX. Is this a racial slur?
The point of this is not to start (perpetuate?) an argument, it's just to try to defuse the emotion surrounding this particular word, so that the point of the original comment can come through again.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
Glenn Brown Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 3095
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 1:18am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
Todd Hembrough wrote:
Glenn Brown wrote:
Todd Hembrough wrote:
The movie Pulp Fiction was filled with 'that word'. Spoken by Tarantino as well as Ving Rhames and Samuel L. Jackson, as an example. I was shocked that it was used as an honorific (almost) and not a pejorative.
T
|
|
|
And Tarantino was widely censured by many for his liberal usage of the word.
Todd, just because you see something in a movie doesn't make that thing right. And I'm sure you know that already; you come across in a very intelligent manner in your posts....
|
|
|
Glenn,
If you read my message, you should have noticed that I said that I was shocked to hear the word used so much, and in such a way.
I dont understand how you can take a statement like the one that I made, and turn it around to mean the opposite of what I said.
T |
|
|
If I misread the intent of your post, my apologies.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
Eric Kleefeld Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 21 December 2004 Location: United States Posts: 4422
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 1:30am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
Mike Murray wrote:
An important point to remember:
Speech balloons may call each other "bubbles" on occasion, but
that's just a cultural thing - and doesn't give outsiders the right to
use that hateful, devisive word! |
|
|
Oh man, that is too good...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Glenn Brown Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 3095
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 2:05am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Melissa Ashton wrote:
Glenn Brown wrote:
John, you cannot possibly be that ignorant to believe that people who use racial slurs do so without any negative intent or connotation. If you do indeed believe that, I strongly encourage you to seek some counsel and educate yourself on the matter, if you don't want to take my word for it. I've only been black and lived in this country for, oh, my entire life, so I may not be aware of how things really are out there... |
|
|
I don't ask this meaning any disrespect at all, but Glenn, are you honestly unaware that the word IS used quite a bit without any intended racist slur?
It reminds me a lot of the words "fag", "dyke", and "poof". All derogatory terms that can be used with a great deal of spite and malice, but which can also be used without such malice, often by the very people they are used against.
When I check the soundtrack of Any Given Sunday, track 11 is "My Niggas" by DMX. Is this a racial slur?
The point of this is not to start (perpetuate?) an argument, it's just to try to defuse the emotion surrounding this particular word, so that the point of the original comment can come through again.
|
|
|
Slur: a shaming or degrading effect: stain, stigma...
an insulting or disparaging remark or innuendo: aspersion...
to reduce, make a substitution for, or omit.
Key word in your question, Melissa, is Intent. I may not intend to slur you by calling you anything but your name, but if my description of you includes words such as the ones you described, I still have done so.
Whether intended or not, it is what it is. So maybe it's synonymous with vehicular manslaughter versus first-degree murder. Maybe you didn't intend to kill the individual. However, that doesn't make him any less dead.
Re your question about DMX...the answer is yes. Just because he is black, as is Richard Pryor, Eddie Murphy, Samuel L. Jackson, et al, doesn't make their use of the word any less of a slur as defined above. There is still a stigma to it. Still a shaming..still an innuendo. Still shows a complete lack of class and more than a fair share of ignorance on the part of the user.
Self-perpetuated racism has historically been one of its most virulent and divisive forms. Self-hatred is at the core of it.
And to be exact, I didn't use the word "racist." I used to word racial, as in pertaining to race or ethnicity. Big difference.
What is astounding to me is that I asked that we not casually toss around racial slurs, much the same way we're discussing the difference between a balloon and a bubble. That request, it seems, cannot just be met with an "Okay, no problem..." as if it needed to be requested in the first place. But, heaven forbid that creations of fantasy are disrespected with shortened derivations of their names, or a gutter is called a line!
I've said it twice now and won't repeat it again. I get the point that JB attempted to make. I thought his comparitive example was poorly chosen and unnecessary, given the fact that the original issue was about comic book terms and not human beings. "Black" and "N___r" are not interchangable technical terms for objects; there was no reason to go there to argue whether or not a balloon is a bubble. I asked that we not casually use those racially-charged words, especially when they have no relation to the issue being discussed (hence the word "casual"). That's it.
Why is that such a difficult concept to grasp? Why does it require any further intellectualizing?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
Craig Ashforth Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 22 April 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 466
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 4:51am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
You Americans are always calling potato crisps potato chips. I don't much fancy a nice bag of fish 'n' crisps!
(just trying to lighten the mood)
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Brian Miller Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 July 2004 Location: United States Posts: 31287
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 8:46am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
It reminds me a lot of the words "fag", "dyke", and "poof".
*****************
Poof? Never heard that one.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Craig Ashforth Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 22 April 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 466
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 9:09am | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
'Poof' is probably the most commonly used derogatory term for homosexuals in the UK anyway. Also 'poofter' (which reminds me of that Monty Python sketch where they are dressed up as stereotypical Australians- all called Bruce- and are drafting up a set of rules/constitution thingy where every second rule is 'no poofters')
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Brian Miller Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 July 2004 Location: United States Posts: 31287
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 9:39am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
It it relegated to male or female? Or does it include all homosexuals?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Craig Ashforth Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 22 April 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 466
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 9:47am | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Just male as far as I am aware.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Ed Love Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 05 October 2004 Location: United States Posts: 2712
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 9:54am | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
Melissa Ashton wrote:
Glenn Brown wrote:
John, you cannot possibly
be that ignorant to believe that people who use racial slurs do so
without any negative intent or connotation. If you do indeed
believe that, I strongly encourage you to seek some counsel and educate
yourself on the matter, if you don't want to take my word for
it. I've only been black and lived in this country for, oh, my
entire life, so I may not be aware of how things really are out
there... |
|
|
I don't ask this meaning any disrespect at all, but Glenn, are you
honestly unaware that the word IS used quite a bit without any intended
racist slur?
It reminds me a lot of the words "fag", "dyke", and "poof". All
derogatory terms that can be used with a great deal of spite and
malice, but which can also be used without such malice, often by
the very people they are used against.
When I check the soundtrack of Any Given Sunday, track 11 is "My Niggas" by DMX. Is this a racial slur?
The point of this is not to start (perpetuate?) an argument, it's
just to try to defuse the emotion surrounding this particular word, so
that the point of the original comment can come through again. |
|
|
recently took part in a diversity awareness program at work. and this
did come up. for some african americans (usually older), the n-word is
definitely insulting and demeaning no matter who uses it. for others
(younger, more urban), it is indeed only acceptable to be used by
people of their race. because coming from someone else implies the
racist connotation whereas used by each other, it has a completely
different connotation, it's taking the term and making fun of it. but,
no matter how well i know someone, my using the word is going to be
taken as an insult. the same is true of the examples you cited. the
problem is they've so long been used as insults by outsiders, that even
when uttered today, the inference is unclear.
eventually, as they continue to subjugate the words for their own use
and it enters into popular culture, their connotations may change, it's
happened in the past. but, right now, those words do have powerful
negative meanings for many when uttered by outsiders and that should be
respected no matter how innocent you may intend it. just because some
pockets don't see it as offensive, the vast majority still do.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Paul Go Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 19 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1394
|
Posted: 26 April 2005 at 11:29am | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Chris Rayman wrote:
To me, the "graphic" portion denotes art or pictures in addition to (or instead of) the text; meaning a "novel" with graphics.
I could be wrong but most novels are produced as original works, rather than reprints of previously serialized installments. If they are, I'm pretty sure they're the exception, rather than the rule. |
|
|
There are plenty of novels which began as serialized installments, from Dickens to King.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
|
|