Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 19
Topic: Using Terms Correctly (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jeff Gillmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1920
Posted: 09 May 2005 at 9:13pm | IP Logged | 1  

What I'm having trouble making sense of is that JB used a word in a sentence.  He didn't call anyone this word.  He just used it in a sentence.  Yet, for some reason a lot of people have gotten their panties in a knot, now claiming that JB is somehow racist for using this word.

For the love of Pete, get a grip folks!  How in the world have we become so thin skinned?  It's a word.  That's it.  IF he used this word to point towards a specific person, then there might be something to get worked up over, but he didn't.  No, instead we have people reading about what he was supposedly to have said, not  what he said and getting all upset over absolutely nothing.  Damn, what a bunch of whiners.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Benson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1070
Posted: 09 May 2005 at 9:21pm | IP Logged | 2  

Maybe there's a scoreboard somewhere for infantile internet behavior.

Watch an actress's accidental porn - 10 points.

Download a movie before you can buy it - 20 points.

Slam a celebrity on their own message board - 75 points.

Have any more?

 



Edited by John Benson on 09 May 2005 at 9:22pm
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16505
Posted: 09 May 2005 at 9:23pm | IP Logged | 3  

Invoke Hitler or Nazis, especially against an opponent in a fight: 100 points
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Roger Klorese
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4
Posted: 09 May 2005 at 9:41pm | IP Logged | 4  

 Matt Hawes wrote:

 Roger Klorese wrote:
...even did grunt production work on some of John's pages back in 1974-75...

What sort of production work, and for which publisher, Marvel or Charlton?



Marvel.  Along with Paul Kupperberg, I worked for Duffy Vohland on the stuff he was doing for the British books (then lamely art-produced in the US), the black-and-whites, and the merchandising catalogs Ivan Snyder worked on -- this was before Ivan left Marvel to start Heroes World. 

Saying that I'm not much of an artist is an understatement -- stick figures have a right to sue me for unflattering likenesses -- but I did everything from cutting zip-a-tone to cleaning brushes to the occasional round of spotting blacks.  I also wrote copy for letter columns, the catalogs, and -- to my everlasting shame -- the British books' Bullpen Bulletins and Stan's Soapboxes.


Edited by Roger Klorese on 09 May 2005 at 9:44pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Greer
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Posts: 14190
Posted: 09 May 2005 at 10:09pm | IP Logged | 5  

I think a lot of people are ignorant when it comes to the impact of racial slurs. I still run into people today that refer to African Americans as "colored". While it might not have the history of the "n" word, many white people use the term "colored" and think it is perfectly normal. Could it be a stretch to believe that someone ignorant enough to use the "n" word might also be ignorant enough to not fully grasp the impact. Spike Lee tried to show in the movie Bamboozled  that some white people want to use the term like black people do, to show they are cool. Or if they are married to a black person it makes it okay, in their mind, to use such a slur.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Melissa Ashton
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Nudge

Joined: 15 April 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1379
Posted: 09 May 2005 at 10:36pm | IP Logged | 6  

Wow, 9 pages of rancor because JB used an inappropriate word as an example of something that's ...erm... inappropriate. Didn't 'use' the word, merely showed it as an example of something that's, well, wrong.

If I understand correctly, the outrage from all these fresh faces and part-time usual suspects (this time around) is his sense of comparative scale.

Am I the only one who thinks this is silly? That this is a pointless argument feeding on itself?

Is it possible that different people have different senses of scale? Would anyone care had I said it, or is there a certain amount of 'Byrne said...' to consider here?

Well, I'm not really after answers to these questions.

 

Edited to add: Topic closed by me.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

<< Prev Page of 19
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login