Author |
|
Rebecca Jansen Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 12 February 2018 Location: Canada Posts: 4635
|
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 4:56pm | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were the two that expressed alarm or credulity at the possibility of Trump becoming president in their private communications with each other, like many millions of other Americans. "Lock them up"? Why not lock all the millions of them up? And of course fire any Judges that don't show proper support for the new president (or have Mexican ancestry) as they are biased.
You are quoting Amanda House (Breitbart) and Jack Probiec (Citizens For Trump) quoting others on Twitter.
Edited by Rebecca Jansen on 14 June 2018 at 4:59pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Thomas Woods Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 09 June 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1356
|
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 5:04pm | IP Logged | 2
|
post reply
|
|
"Lock them up" is the exact opposite of what I would want. It just brings into question what they overlook and what they focus on. I'm too in the dark to make that call.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Dave Phelps Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 4185
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 5:58am | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
It's reasonable to ask if someone demonstrated inappropriate bias in their handling of a situation.
The problem is when it becomes a matter of completely refusing to accept that wasn't any indication that occurred, especially if you ham it up for political purposes.
"I'm calling for a new investigation."
"But three independent and thorough investigations, including one run by your own committee, have already concluded nothing improper occurred."
"We just need to get to the bottom of this. If they did nothing wrong, they shouldn't have a problem with that."
Edited by Dave Phelps on 15 June 2018 at 6:00am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Eric Ladd Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 August 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 4505
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 6:39am | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
How about this tack: They did nothing wrong and had no problem with the three independent investigations already completed. However, a fourth investigation appears to be a search for evidence in support a conclusion already reached. How much more bottom is there to get down to?
At this point several people have gone through the thousands of texts these two sent to one another and found nothing. Their performance on the job was not compromised, but they he was let go and she was already gone after the affair was made public. Be prepared for the GOP to seize on anything that can be stretched and manipulated into a narrative to support the witch hunt chant.
Edited by Eric Ladd on 15 June 2018 at 6:52am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Dave Phelps Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 4185
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 7:14am | IP Logged | 5
|
post reply
|
|
"I don't understand why you don't have a problem with a federal investigation possibly being run improperly by biased personnel and why you would want to deprive the American people of the answers they deserve."
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Eric Ladd Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 August 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 4505
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 7:28am | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
"The American people do deserve answers. Are you telling me that the first three investigations were done improperly and therefore we need a fourth? The American people deserve for their politicians to get things done right the first time or at least within the three strike rule, don't they? Otherwise, we as politicians seem inept or willfully running the cost up or heaven forbid, looking for something that doesn't exist. Which is it?"
** read this in a southern accent ** =)
Edited by Eric Ladd on 15 June 2018 at 7:31am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Dave Phelps Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 4185
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 10:31am | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
"I don't understand why you don't have a problem with a federal investigation possibly being run improperly by biased personnel and why you would want to deprive the American people of the answers they deserve."
(Lather, rinse, repeat.)
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Eric Ladd Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 August 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 4505
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 11:10am | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
Dave, it is sad we know the song and dance so well. The lunacy is predictable. I did see the US has announced tarrifs against China, the NYSE is down triple digits and the US is pulling out of the UN Human Rights council. Just an average news day I suppose.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Eric Ladd Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 August 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 4505
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 11:31am | IP Logged | 9
|
post reply
|
|
Looks like a judge has decided Paul Manafort will await trial in jail. That is kind of interesting.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Richard Stevens Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 May 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1956
|
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 1:17pm | IP Logged | 10
|
post reply
|
|
you can only dick around with witnesses so much before you piss off the judge.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Rebecca Jansen Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 12 February 2018 Location: Canada Posts: 4635
|
Posted: 16 June 2018 at 8:54am | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
Took long enough. I'm just wondering if the promised pardon power will start getting used again soon. :^(
Oh look, another undisclosed Russian oligarch banned from entering the U.S., and communicating with witnesses about their testimony, Russian tv is covering it, but that's okay, the big guy will pardon us all. Nothing to see here folks, completely exonerated, now let's investigate that crooked Hillary with the lust for power in her eyes yet again!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Charles Valderrama Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 4849
|
Posted: 19 June 2018 at 8:02am | IP Logged | 12
|
post reply
|
|
This issue has given new meaning to the word "heartless".
Trump's administration is trying very hard to convince Americans that it’s Congress, not the White House, that’s responsible for its own “zero tolerance” immigration policy that’s left separated thousands of children from their parents at the border.
Under past administrations, undocumented migrants typically underwent civil deportation procedures & often allowed to remain with their children, either through being released or held in family detention centers.
What's going on now is simply outrageous.
-C!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|