Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 444 Next >>
Topic: Acting Presidential Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Mark Waldman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1273
Posted: 02 December 2017 at 2:16pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

Yesterday was quite a news day. I like how all the things we knew about during the election are finally being confirmed, only now we are strangle held by a criminal administration and terrible policies being rolled out. If only our checks and balances allowed for us to stop the train when we heard Russia intervention, Trump's love for Putin and all things Russia, his refusal to show his tax returns, etc. However this turns out - hopefully with people being thrown in jail - Putin still wins. He exposed the weaknesses in our democracy and took full advantage of them. The term "fake news" now in the lexicon when the only fake news is Fox' propaganda machine. Shameful stuff, scary times, but I'll take the small victories like yesterday.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Fred J Chamberlain
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4037
Posted: 02 December 2017 at 2:22pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

The first thing that a tyrant will do is undermine and/or destroy news
agencies and sources. As soon as he coined the phrase, I shivered at
what might follow.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Sommerville
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 417
Posted: 02 December 2017 at 6:02pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Once again I have no horse in the race. Just trying to understand the facts without the emotion. 
The take I get is, Michael Flynn lied about doing something perfectly legal to the FBI. Talking to Russians was not outside his purview or a crime. So basically he was just an idiot. If he has any unverifiable information about Trump he is going to make a shitty witness. He did not disclose all information on security forms, was fired for lying to Pence and now is convicted of lying to the FBI.

I think some people are singing, Ding Dong the Witch is Dead, a little early. So far we have two guys charged with dealings unrelated to Trump from years ago and two guys pleading guilty to lying.

What other than obstruction of justice if proven can they charge Trump with? 
Back to Top profile | search
 
David Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 3099
Posted: 02 December 2017 at 6:31pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

This Flynn announcement has brought out every conservative mall lawyer in America to insist Meuller has now released every bit of evidence his investigation has turned up, and that the specific charge in any plea deal quite obviously represents the most serious violations of the law. I mean, it's almost 7:30 pm Saturday on the east coast, and Mueller hasn't indicted anyone today. I guess it's all done, right?

It's malign wishful thinking, driven by right-wing "legal scholars" whose day jobs are as radio insult comics who function as party apparatchiks when they aren't selling gold coins and reverse mortgages to senior citizens. Men who haven't practiced law in decades, if they ever did, but remember just enough to gild their deceptions.

The only sensible response is to withhold judgement until more information is available.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Sommerville
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 417
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 3:23am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

I agree David but include every Liberal mall lawyer and Left-wing "legal scholars". Both sides are fantasizing that this is the start of their ultimate Trump endgame. Neither side knows what Meuller has or has not found. Everything is speculation and it is humorous to see each side in their perspective huddles pointing and laughing at the other side.

I will not lie, I enjoy Alan Dershowitz take on things. I do not believe he is a Mall Lawyer or a Right-Wing legal scholar. He seems to look at this issue analytically and devoid of like or dislike of the players. I also enjoy Left-wing legal scholar, Jeffery Toobin's take even though  he does not hide his disgust of the player involved. 


Edited by Michael Sommerville on 03 December 2017 at 3:29am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36018
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 3:47am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

 Michael Sommerville wrote:
The take I get is, Michael Flynn lied about doing something perfectly legal to the FBI. Talking to Russians was not outside his purview or a crime. So basically he was just an idiot.

It's more than him just being an idiot.  He spoke to a hostile state during a time of transition when he was not at liberty to make any deals at all.  He did so before "his guy" was sworn into office and while another President was still in power.  That's a huge deal in and of itself.  You can't do that.  It's illegal.  And he lied about it.  It was absolutely "outside his purview" and it's totally "a crime" based on when he made the contact, which was before January 20, 2017.  
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31229
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 7:56am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Not only that but he has admitted he did so under direction from then President-elect Trump. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Woodcock
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7818
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 9:18am | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Fart says that what he did was not a crime.

So that's that then
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Charles Valderrama
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4847
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 10:45am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

PROOF: Trump admitted he KNEW Michael Flynn lied to the FBI... yet tried to influence or stop the FBI investigation on Flynn by firing Comey. 

Only a matter of time before the law catches up to him. Sadly, his accomplices in the GOP Congress will not go down with him.

-C!
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133458
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 11:21am | IP Logged | 10 post reply

It's as if Rump has the mind of a child without the innocence of a child. He seems, like a child, to believe each lie writes over the previous one, but for him it is in some Orwellian way.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Sommerville
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 417
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 12:44pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

Almost every Legal analyst I have watched say talking to the Russians is only a crime, for candidate or president-elect and his people, if charged under the Logan Act. Many agree it would be a stretch to charge under that, and harder to get a conviction.
Everyone knows Trump's tweets are full of lies and nonsense to stroke his ego. Everyone calls him out about his lying tweets, unless it is what they want to hear. So now his tweets are fact and proof he obstructed justice.
I have said before that he is the hyper-active child that is always saying "look at me, look what i can do". He is the worlds most powerful Internet troll and media and people in general feed him. Responding to every stupid thing he says or does just feeds his fire. Even if he is POTUS, not everything he says or does is news worthy, most is just BS that should be ignored, but that would not be good for ratings.



Edited by Michael Sommerville on 03 December 2017 at 12:45pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 03 December 2017 at 12:57pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply

News reports are claiming that 45's lawyer wrote the tweet.

Which, coincidentally, happened to have an exclamation mark at the end. Most use exclamation marks sparingly; 45 uses them almost all of the time.

How convenient...
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 444 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login