Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 8 Next >>
Topic: $448,125 (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13705
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 6:04am | IP Logged | 1  

Found more information online.  The PAWN STARS guys offered him $1000 for it.  Ha!

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Paul Greer
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Posts: 14190
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 6:46am | IP Logged | 2  

I don't know how much Miller sells his work for. I did, however, see a recent(ish) cover to All Star Batman and Robin sell through an art dealer for over 5K. If he was selling this for Miller I do not know. But it gives a indication of what his modern work will collect.
He is an anomaly like Adam Hughes. Anything they do seems to fetch a great deal of money on the after market. Most artists, like Gibbons, only have a few works that are high priced while the rest of their work is affordable. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Wilson Mui
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4557
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 6:56am | IP Logged | 3  

I can kind of understand Miller's popularity given his body of work, but why does Adam Hughes get such high prices?  He recently auctioned a convention sketch that has not even been drawn yet on eBay for over $4,000.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13705
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 7:13am | IP Logged | 4  

Frank Miller's art has two things going for it:  he's a huge name in the comic industry with some of the most famous works in the medium over the last 30+ years to his credit and he's one of the few comicbook talents with legitimate crossover appeal into the mainstream.

Adam Hughes I also don't get.  I understand people liking his art and I don't question his talent.  I question why he's so mega-popular.  He has almost no actual comic work to his credit.  A few covers here and there.  You would think to be as popular as he is he would have to have some actual comic work backing him up. 

Person A: "Oh wow, that Adam Hughes is good!  What is he famous for?"

Person B: "Well, he drew this really cool half naked picture of Catwoman at a convention one time."

Person A: "............?"
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Steve Ogden
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1263
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 7:28am | IP Logged | 5  

JB mention earlier $40,000 was paid for Jim Lee's X-Men original art.  In the book "Grail Pages" put out by TwoMorrows publishing; there is an interview with the guy who bought the art for that amount.  He said the money he paid for the art was a tax write off for him.

"Grail Pages" is a nice book because of the art they show but most of the people (dealer/collectors) in the book really have this elitist mindset about the art they have and the money paid.

 

Edited by Steve Ogden on 07 May 2011 at 8:50am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Wilson Mui
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4557
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 7:33am | IP Logged | 6  

Just for the heck of it, here is a commission by JB where he draws in Miller's style.



Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve Ogden
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1263
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 8:49am | IP Logged | 7  

I would much rather have that in my collection.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Nathan Greno
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 9154
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 3:11pm | IP Logged | 8  

I think that Miller page is nice.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Siedlik
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 80
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 11:13pm | IP Logged | 9  

I hate to break it to any Dark Knight fans who read the previous posts about DKR pages selling for $3k, but that estimate is out-of-date. 2 other DKR pages were in that same auction.

One of them had Batman and Joker's corpse on it. It sold for $44k. 

The other one featured Batman, but he was in disguise as a bag lady, and the page had several panels which were not the versions which actually saw print. It sold for $14k.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Stephen Churay
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 March 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 8369
Posted: 07 May 2011 at 11:42pm | IP Logged | 10  

You guys really don't understand the appeal of Adam Hughes art? Do
you have a pulse?
***
I think the price on that Miller piece is ridiculous. For $4,400 it would
be reasonable. Considering how famous the page is, I could even see
$8,000. But for half a mil...if I even had that kind of bread to throw
around, I'd only do it for my favorite Frazetta original painting. Even
then, I'd be over paying, I just wouldn't care.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Robert White
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4560
Posted: 08 May 2011 at 12:54am | IP Logged | 11  

I've always found the prices on original comic art to be ridiculous. The collector market itself is absurd when you really think about it. I've never been able to wrap my head around the concept of buying something beyond a typical retail item marked up from production costs to make a profit. Even then, I'm often blown away with how much we pay for items that cost manufacturers a fraction of the sale price to create.

If I had the resources to buy the greatest works of high art ever created, I'd pass. What's the point of owning the Mona Lisa if you can observe the painting anytime you like with high quality digital representations in books or online, if not see it in person? The emotional content is what it's all about, not the physical object itself. "I have this and nobody else in the world does! Ha!"  

I'm also of the mindset that certain works of art can never belong to one person. For me, owning an original piece of historically significant art is egocentric. What, beyond the flexing of the old financial muscles, does this prove?  That you're "The biggest Frank Miller fan in the world!"? That your existence is somehow elevated by right of possession? 

 

 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Chris Cottrill
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 September 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 375
Posted: 08 May 2011 at 1:28am | IP Logged | 12  

It's a HOBBY!!
Like Baseball cards used to be.
Like Comics used to be.

Speculators suck!! :(
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 8 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login