| Posted: 29 November 2010 at 2:45am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Oddly this is one aspect of the H/S interaction that *isn't* necessarily an ontological paradox. Provided that Sathanas is 'precisely the sort of name, Hilltop's own reading and culture would have suggested', then, there is still an implicit ur-timeline causality. That is Hilltop names himself Sathanas because (at that point) he knows he was named Sathanas, but if he had become Sathanas *without* encountering his future-self it would still have been his natural coinage. There's only a 'where did the information come from' paradox if the information *could not have been* generated by either party (past or future). The man who gets a note saying 'steal the box at the corner of 40th and Main, it's a time machine and then use it to send yourself this note' who then sends himself the note, has information with no apparent source. It looks possible, but it in fact implies a previous 'ur' timeline in which somehow the man (or someone wishing to benefit him) is aware of and has the use of the time machine, without the note to prompt him (them). Otherwise its a kind of thermodynamic miracle and profoundly unstable, as any changes downwhen from use of the time machine, or other time machines will tend to lead to the note not being written and the man not getting the machine and not writing the note. Simon BJ
|