Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 19 Next >>
Topic: BP Oil Spill (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Steven Myers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5703
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 5:59pm | IP Logged | 1  

What do they do with nuclear waste now?

They could try using it to plug leaking oil wells.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 6:00pm | IP Logged | 2  

They can now dump all nuclear waste in the Gulf. Everything's dead down there anyways.

One hand washes the other!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12736
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 6:03pm | IP Logged | 3  

There's a windfarm near one of the provincial parks that we go to with the kids.  It's almost surreally beautiful.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10934
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 6:14pm | IP Logged | 4  

They bury it in Nevada. Which is ok - what they came
up with is pretty secure, but moving forward, I think
we can do better.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Simpson Simpson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 April 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 939
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 6:52pm | IP Logged | 5  

Chris Back was banned

I know this is off topic,but why did that happen? I'm just curious what someone has to do to get banned.

 Now on topic. I'm all for nuclear power.It would help cut back on the need for oil.The only problem is the waste and what to do with it. Shooting it into the sun makes sense. The big problem with that is what Mr.Byrne pointed out. There are so many scientifically illiterate people out there that will worry about the environmental impact on the sun and oppose the idea.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Corcoran
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 July 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 151
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 8:46pm | IP Logged | 6  

One more vote for shooting the nuclear waste into the sun. Tell Cape Canaveral to start chargin' up the solar powered booster rockets!

Of course, if we don't properly reinforce the environmentally friendly biodegradable corn oil-based plastic exoskeleton on the shuttle, we could be looking upwards at the mother-all of "hard rain a-fallin."
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jon Tremmeh
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 March 2009
Posts: 166
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 11:06pm | IP Logged | 7  

Into the sun! Brilliant!
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Olson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 324
Posted: 08 June 2010 at 11:55pm | IP Logged | 8  

I thought it was ironic as I was pumping my gas at a BP station, and I read the sign at the pump "Do not leave pump unattended.  You will be responsible for your spill."
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Monte Gruhlke
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3303
Posted: 09 June 2010 at 2:51am | IP Logged | 9  

I'm all for shooting nuclear waste into the sun. I'm sure if that were the objective, an efficient system could be put in place that would be reasonably-priced to do it. We're on the edge of commercial space ventures, so chances are it's becoming more economical everyday to get something into orbit (and beyond).

My only concern is that if the Sun's nuclear fusion was suddenly "upset" by all that extra material, would we need to also have control-rod rockets and water-filled rockets standing by?
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joseph Gauthier
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 March 2009
Posts: 1421
Posted: 09 June 2010 at 1:03pm | IP Logged | 10  

Is there no option to reuse the nuclear plant waste in a lesser application, or is it truly spent?

There is, Michael; it's called nuclear transmutation, but unfortunately, it's been a political victim here in the US.  Our European friends, however, seem to be more commited to it. 

Though I've been reading about it since I was a teenager (hey, I loved Firestorm comics), I'm not going to attempt to describe it because I won't get it entirely correct, but I do encourage all of you reading this to look into it; my understanding is that it's safe and efficient, and quite possibly a necessary step toward a scientificly viable and economicly justifiable fusion reactor.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10934
Posted: 09 June 2010 at 1:24pm | IP Logged | 11  

I agree with Joseph.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6832
Posted: 09 June 2010 at 1:33pm | IP Logged | 12  

So those that are pro nuclear what are your feelings on  Love Canal  and Chernobyl ?


Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 19 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login