| Posted: 20 June 2010 at 12:36am | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Exxon was nowhere near the same magnitude, and Bopal and Chernobyl were not at all of this nature.
Care to try again?
_________________________________________________________ Not really, my original post specifically mentions both environmental and social damage. By that, you could also add damage to the Amazon rainforest and a whole host of other industries (Mining etc). As I said in my original post, BP should be made to pay through the nose for this. But so should other companies causing environmental and social damage throughout the world. Look, it's the ocean, that makes the damage very visible and mobile. But look at the loss of the coral reef. Look at the damage shipping noises do to whales. These and many more problems are chronic and systemic. This is not. I would love to see these words being addressed to some of the chronic issues. That is my point and has been since my first post.
|
Topic Closed)
