Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 170 Next >>
Topic: Healthcare Debate (was: Quesada apologizes) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
William McCormick
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2006
Posts: 3297
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 7:38am | IP Logged | 1  

Again, insurance companies are businesses.  They make less profit than soda makers, retail stores or HOSPITALS.  If they make no profit, than they go away and no one has insurance.  So they, like any other business, have to constantly make decisions regarding their business practices.  Unfortunately, their decisions involve sick people.  So there's always emotion, and hyperbole, involved.  They aren't perfect.  But they are certainly not the bad guys.

********

After what my wife went through because one of these companies wanted to protect their profit margin, all I can say is stick it where the sun don't shine. I hope it never happens to a member of your family.

They have a smaller profit margin that all of the above, but they also have less overhead.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Donald Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3601
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 7:54am | IP Logged | 2  

Again, insurance companies are businesses.  They make less profit than soda makers, retail stores or HOSPITALS.  If they make no profit, than they go away and no one has insurance.  So they, like any other business, have to constantly make decisions regarding their business practices.  Unfortunately, their decisions involve sick people.  So there's always emotion, and hyperbole, involved.  They aren't perfect.  But they are certainly not the bad guys.

Insurance companies are one of the single largest factors in the rising cost of health care.  Sure they are a business and as such seek better seals for them selves & etc.  I posit that the health of the nation should not be a for profit institution...There is plenty of money to be made off of "optional" insurances...Life/Car/Pet/Home etc...

We as a nation should simply agree on some basic priorities...

1. Our nation should have an easily mobilized protective force...just in case.

2. Our citizens should be healthy, and we should do things that encourage that health.

3. Every citizen should be provided an education, and the opportunity to create a career for themselves.

We can do these things. I believe that if our lawmakers would think of what benefits the country instead of what can help them stay in office or pay for more campaigning we would all be happier for it.





Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 8:00am | IP Logged | 3  

Insurance companies are all scumbags.

William sorry about what happened.  It happens to lots of us.  


Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Gillmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1920
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 8:17am | IP Logged | 4  

Yes, the insurance companies are evil for trying to make a profit.  The thing is, these insurance regulation problems could have been addressed without creating a new federal beauracracy and all the new mandates on individuals.  Seriously, what in the hell does student loans have to do with health care?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 8:25am | IP Logged | 5  

Making a profit off of denying people procedures?  Off of bankrupting them?  Jeff cut it out.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 8:53am | IP Logged | 6  

Individually, the people in the insurance industry are not evil. But you know, some of the greatest evils in history have been done by folks who were "just following orders."

Edited by Joe Zhang on 25 March 2010 at 8:54am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 8:57am | IP Logged | 7  

"The thing is, these insurance regulation problems could have been addressed without creating a new federal beauracracy and all the new mandates on individuals. "

In other words, insurance regulation problems could have been solved by more self-regulation. Which was what got the banks in trouble and took the rest of the world down with them.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8149
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 9:09am | IP Logged | 8  

Even though I lean right, it is hard for me to defend insurance companies..the capitalist in me understands the need to make a profit, but the consumerist in me feels that, moral issues aside, a company must provide the service that their customers paid for, and that trumps all for me. My big issue with them is that their business model relies on finding ways to NOT service their customers...I can't think of any other form of business that gets away with this. They are also practice one of the only still-legalized forms of discrimination - a 20-year-old can be the safest driver in the world, with no accidents on record, yet he or she is forced to pay much more for service no matter what. If that's ok, if there was a statistic that Black people are more prone to get into car accidents, shouldn't it be ok to make them pay more as well, under the same principle? Of course it isn't, for obvious reasons, so why is it ok to discriminate on age?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Gillmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1920
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 9:17am | IP Logged | 9  

No Joe, the federal government could have imposed new regulations on the insurance companies.  Instead, they gave them over 30 million new paying customers.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Gillmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1920
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 9:21am | IP Logged | 10  

"We need to change the end-of-life culture.  Most people are woefully unprepared for the inevitable and many resources are spent in vain.  But not all - there is a place for expensive and unneeded care.  Nearly every treatment used today was outrageously expensive in its genesis.  It gets really bad when doctors say its time to pack it in and families just can't do it.

We've left patients to languish on ventilators for days and days until the clan could be gathered together to be there when grandpa "passes".  Never mind that grandpa passed three days and $9000 ago.  If you had to stay in a $1500 hotel room every night waiting for your brother to drive from Yellowknife to Buenos Aires, wouldn't that seem a ridiculous waste?  And yet that's going on all over the place, all the time."

I wonder what could be used to correct this?  I know DEATH PANELS!  Who would have ever guessed that Hagerman agrees with Palin?

I'm joking with you Kevin...just in case you don't get it...

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 9:24am | IP Logged | 11  

Sounds a lot like Hitler thinking to me.  Newsweek story: "The Case For Killing Granny" or something like that argued old people cost too much at the end of their lives so we should give them a good push! 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Roy Linfred
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 March 2010
Posts: 22
Posted: 25 March 2010 at 9:52am | IP Logged | 12  

 
 QUOTE:
Perhaps if they spent there resources creating incentives for healthy behaviors and covering preventative care we'd have less trouble with chronic health problems in this country.

Insurance companies spend a lot of time and money trying to get their insured individuals preventative care.

I have a very close relative that works for one the largest insurance companies in the US, and all I can say is that their is a lot of mis-information in this thread.

William it sounds like you went thru a very personal experience, and I empathize with what you went thru, so please don't take any of my comments personally.

People hear cases where someone has an illness, and the doctor will prescribe a package of care.  The insurance company says that they consider the treatment and experimental, and it costs more than what is reasonable and customary, and they don't want to be funding what could be classified as research.  Everyone gets all up in arms at the insurer, but nobody points fingers at the hospital or doctors who won't help people without the gaurantee of a huge paycheck.

 

 



Edited by Roy Linfred on 25 March 2010 at 9:53am
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 170 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login