Posted: 20 February 2010 at 9:53pm | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Well, yeah! It really does - look - I'm lucky - I don't have a family to take care of - I'm just me, so I've got a step up there. Though, like, when I was working at the soup kitchen, sometimes families would come in to volunteer - make it a family event. (Sadly, more often families would come in for the soup.) Here's the important thing to remember - this is something that Geoff and I seem to really see eye to eye on - the people? The PEOPLE - not the politicians? Those folk aren't so concerned about red and blue and left and right - we all want the same thing - to take care of ourselves and our own (families or otherwise) - to have food on the table, a roof over our heads, steady employment to provide that. And a lot of times, in an effort to make that a reality, the people don't have time to participate - that's for sure. And if they're going through their lives, doing what they can, I don't fault them at all. It's rough out there. It's not easy for anyone. For those working hard? Well... that's what it is - hard work. For those living on charity, be it via government or family or religion, etc? They're paying for it in pride and loss of self-respect. And besides - we talk a good game about Reagan's mythical "welfare queens", but I can vouch for this - I've known a lot of people who got welfare, or got GA (in one case because of such a violent physical attack that her brain was damaged and she had trouble holding down steady employment due to black outs and so on) and NONE of these people were getting rich from the government - they weren't making enough to LIVE on - you have to work really hard to work the system enough to live off it. What you get from a government check and food stamps is just less than what you need to survive - one suspects it's that way to encourage you to not get used to it. WITH the government checks you still need the charity of others. They alone won't pay your rent or get you enough proper food to get by on. Now, could the system be adjusted to include more education or support to help the recepients not be dependant on it? Of course. I'm all for that. You show me any politicians or spokesmen who are against that and I'll rage against them. I'm with you on that. But I don't advocate the elimination of the programs. I am firmly behind them - I believe in this sort of insurance. Look - I don't like paying my car insurance each month. But if I ever get into an accident, I'm going to go kiss my State Farm Agent on the lips. I'll slip that hairly sonofabitch the tounge, too! Because while I hate paying into it each month, the beauty of insurance is the comfort of knowing that when the unthinkable happens, you're covered. Unless it's the American Health Insurance industry, where you're screwed either way, but that's another debate, isn't it?
|