Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 26 Next >>
Topic: Why "your old stuff was better..." (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jason Mark Hickok
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 February 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 10472
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:10am | IP Logged | 1  

Wilson- I think nostalgia does play some part into it but maybe in regards to what is someone's "favorite" work by an artist.  This can then lead into what they consider to be the artists "best" work.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:11am | IP Logged | 2  

Scott, JB himself has said that he's been getting "your old stuff is better" since he turned pro. You think that after 25 years as a high profile creator Erik Larsen hasn't heard the same criticisms as JB got by the first year?

This is something that all pros hear at one time or another and any pro is entitled to have an opinion about. I don't care what your opinion is of Erik Larsen, but to assume that he doesn't have the right to an opinion about this as a seasoned professional is what is arrogant.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott O'Malley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 July 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:20am | IP Logged | 3  

he has a message board for posting his thoughts on the comic art form... he has to come here because of what ensues. 

I am not fighting for JB.... its just a stupid first post. Its obvious... Einstein's later work (nuclear power) was much more prolific and brilliant than his early work. But the early work is remembered because that is what made him famous in the first place.

When something is put out there as "classic" and "epic" like Dark Phoenix, other things naturally will look lessor to begin with.

The only reason Larsen bothers me is that, it seems to me, he knew exactly what he was doing and that it would start a fire... why?  he went out of his way in the first post to say "this is not directed at any one artist" 2 times... to write that, he can't play dumb now... he knew he was writing something that COULD BE construed as a slight to JB (hence the disclaimer being added twice), so my only question, again, is WHY HERE AND NOT YOUR FORUM....

Except he was posting it in another artist's forum, where just what he was posting has been a long running point of frustration for said artist... come on guys, its obvious!!

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3517
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:23am | IP Logged | 4  

Scott, most of us here are capable of having civil discussions, even with people with whom we strongly disagree.  I see that you're relatively new.  Regardless of your mind reading as to why Erik posted his initial post, the rest of us are discussing its content.  If you want to do the same, great.  But all you're doing now is trying to start a secondary, off-topic debate about Erik that the rest of us, by and large, aren't interested in.


Back to Top profile | search
 
John Peter Britton
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9129
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:24am | IP Logged | 5  

With age you mature like a fine wine!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31284
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:25am | IP Logged | 6  

he has a message board for posting his thoughts on the comic art form... he has to come here because of what ensues.

******************

Wow. You simply must take your mindreading out on the road. You'll make millions!

Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott O'Malley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 July 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:26am | IP Logged | 7  

Steve, I hear you... i'll move along... long time lurker here,
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:27am | IP Logged | 8  


 QUOTE:
The only reason Larsen bothers me is that, it seems to me, he knew exactly what he was doing and that it would start a fire... why?

Before your post (which is more than 30 posts into the thread), the discussion was only about comparison of earlier work (of at least several different artists) to later/current work.

If there's a fire, it seems you're the one who started it.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott O'Malley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 July 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 9:32am | IP Logged | 9  

agreed paulo
Back to Top profile | search
 
Albert Matthews
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 August 2006
Posts: 2204
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 10:55am | IP Logged | 10  

My own experience in a (semi) creative profession--in my case journalism--is that I reached a point around age 35 or so where the mechanics were all second nature to me. So my stories were all flawlessly written, but tended to lack that undefinable "spark" which separates technical brilliance from something legitimately exciting. I opted at that point to abandon journalism for teaching because I wanted to feel creatively uncertain again (and find a goddamn job), but if I hadn't I would have no doubt become an "elder statesman" of journalism--still loving the profession, but past the point where I truly had anything new or original to add to the mix. This type of progression in a field isn't a knock against anybody, it's simply human nature. On every technical level, "Bringing out the Dead" is a far superior film to 'Taxi Driver," but I've never heard of anyone being passionate about the former.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133555
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 10:59am | IP Logged | 11  

…he has a message board for posting his thoughts on the comic art form... he has to come here because of what ensues.

******************

Wow. You simply must take your mindreading out on the road. You'll make millions!

••

Oh, come on! THAT thread title in THIS Forum? Please! This is Erik being his terribly clever self, as usual. You don't need to read minds to see it. Especially when, as noted, he has his own forum in which to discuss whatever he wants.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jonathan Watkins
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 November 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 850
Posted: 11 July 2009 at 11:01am | IP Logged | 12  

As a reader of comic books I've been drawn to clear storytelling.  I'll always prefer a Dave Gibbons or a John Byrne to someone who has a lot of sizzle but no steak.  Which makes it frustrating that so many of the fans go for the flashy, splash page-prone, pin-up artists.

If there was a magic month where every comic book had to be done with a nine panel grid on every page, a lot of popular artists would not be turning in any work. Gibbons, JB and the others who have taken the time to figure out sequential storytelling could all still be dynamic and clear within that constraint.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 26 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login