Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 69 Next >>
Topic: Grandeur? What’s That? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Keith Thomas
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 April 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 3082
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 1:19pm | IP Logged | 1  

I was familiar with FQ's work but didn't have a name to put
to it, but just punching up a quick Google image search and
wow, this guy's favorite shot is everyone standing around
doing nothing. How completely boring.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Keith Thomas
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 April 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 3082
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 1:23pm | IP Logged | 2  

Assuming Nightcrawler appears within the pages of this
comic, does that mean it depicts part of the story?


I think that was a special series of covers that weren't
supposed to focus on the story the other 2 had Wolverine's
claws and Colossus' fist.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve WeZ
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 September 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 125
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 1:35pm | IP Logged | 3  

"40 issues of a book he didn't enjoy writing. The poor devil!!

---------------------------------------

Morrison has also admitted to taking high-paying jobs on mainstream characters to pay the bills while he works on the creator-owned stuff that he really wants to do."

  "Seems like only yesterday I was being excoriated by some fans for working "only for the money" (not even remotely true), but Morrison comes right out and says that's why he does superheroes, and remains a fan fave?When did comic fans start hating the form and themselves so much?"

   This is usually what popular "Rock n roll" and "movie stars" say after an album or a film flops. It exonerates them from any responsibility for bad or mediocre work by just stating that they were doing a job...."Hey, I know that movie was baaaad, but I got PAID! "
  Billy Bob Thornton was just on Bill Maher stating how a movie he was in was really bad.. but he got to buy a house with the money. He said for every 2 or 3 movies he HAS to do to pay the bills allows him to make the ones he WANTS to do.  
   Makes sense that Morrison and a lot of other comic guys now see themselves as ROCK stars. Plus it makes the studio/editors seem like the bad guys.


Edited by Steve WeZ on 29 June 2009 at 1:40pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133569
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 1:49pm | IP Logged | 4  

As I said, the worst possible moment to depict as the cover, but at least it was part of the story inside.

••

Which is very different for depicting the story, which is what you really said.. Few covers really do that, t'is true -- but that X-MEN cover moves even further off mark than most.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133569
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 1:52pm | IP Logged | 5  

One picture that I do remember was a shot with Cyclops and Wolverine in the jet. Professor Xavier was mind-linked with Scott so the panel was described as seen from Prof X's point of view through Scott's eyes, looking out onto the night sky from the cockpit. Both Scott and Logan reflected in the windscreen, with clouds and stars visible as well. I thought that was a good idea for a shot, and did the best I could to acheive it. (Pretty well I thought) When I saw the printed version that Quietly had drawn is was shot from the outside of the jet, looking in.   A boring and quite frankly easier option.

I wasn't a fan of Quietly's to begin with (his line has no variation and everyone looks like they're made from jelly moulds) but that just made me think that he was an uncaring hack.

••

He also appears to have had the misfortune of working with a writer who thinks he's writing movies.

Thanks for that classic example of why Full Script is a BAD idea most of the time!

Back to Top profile | search
 
Chris Geary
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 January 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1158
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 2:05pm | IP Logged | 6  

He also appears to have had the misfortune of working with a writer who thinks he's writing movies.

--

Most writers do nowadays.  Lines and lines of description of many, many multi-actioned panels that will be covered up by lines and lines of dialogue.

---

Thanks for that classic example of why Full Script is a BAD idea most of the time!

--

I pretty much agree.  Another recent example.

Three weeks ago finshed a job (pencils, inks and letters) - it was full script but I had to change things around in order to make it work.  I've worked with the Editor/writer for a while now so he knows that I only do it in order to clarify, and hopefully improve, the script.

Got an email yesterday to say that he likes it but is going to meet with the co-writer this week to revise the script and then send any changes to me at the weekend.  The picture are fine, they just want to revise the dialogue.  Why not just send me a plot in the first place?  At least I wouldn't have to re-letter anything?

You had anything similar happen to you, JB?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Lars Johansson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 June 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 6113
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 2:07pm | IP Logged | 7  

Yet why did Christopher Reeve look good in the Superman films?  We could even see the stiching.

I don't get what you mean exactly, but in my opinion they got it all wrong when they try to draw real or like a movie. A movie writer/director can never do what a comic book artist/writer can do. It's getting closer but they are not there. In the Superman movies the story had to be adapted to what was possible. For example in Superman IV (bad example but it's the one I know about) they had to go to another location than they desired. Let's say the writer was called in to rewrite, it happens. I have met a writer (he wrote sleepless in Seattle) who had to lie in the room next to the studio on a bed just to rewrite. Tell me when that happens in a comic book.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Donald Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3601
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 2:15pm | IP Logged | 8  

Which is very different for depicting the story, which is what you really said.

Whoops!  Sorry I was unclear.

As to the marvel method vs. full script. 

I cannot imagine having an great artist working on a title and not letting them be the the master of visual design/effect/camera angle, etc.  The marvel Method seems to me to offer the best of both worlds....Writer comes up with plot/artists tells story using pictures/writer fleshes out with dialogue and captions.

I cannot for the life of me imagine wanting to put limits on someone like JB who is a master storyteller in his own right, by insisting on a certain angle or set up.  That is his domain. 

Don
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Chris Geary
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 January 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1158
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 2:18pm | IP Logged | 9  

Lars,

I meant that in the Superman films with Christopher Reeve, he looked like Superman.  He was tall, strong looking, like the comic.  Yet when artists decide they want to have the characters appear in 'realistic' costumes, they do not look good at all.  As it's been noted above, they look like people in costumes.  Christopher Reeve didn't.  He looked like Superman.

In the recent comicbook films they've gone all hi-tech and tried to make everyone look like they've been drawn (all the muscles showing, etc) and it looks bad.  The X-men costumes were pretty good, and I think they made the best decision in that regard.  But modern day Batman has never looked good, neither did BR in Superman Returns.

it seems that whatever magic was in the original films* cannot be re-captured.

Also thinking about it, the costumes in Star Wars have always been pretty out there - I know it's different to Superheroes - but they've pretty much looked good.  Empire Strikes Back looks like it was drawn by Al Williamson.

*The one and a half with Richard Donner involved.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Stephen Robinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5835
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 2:24pm | IP Logged | 10  

The "art" of the cover is something that I dearly miss: Covers that practically grab you and demand that you buy it. I often list FF 260 in this category. There's a *story* there -- in just the expression on Sue's face. This is something I *had* to read.

Heck, I used to be able to refer to specific issues by the cover: "Yeah, the one where Elektra is holding up Daredevil's ripped mask" or "the one where a giant Darkseid is holding Superman up by his cape!"

Now, I really have no idea. There are a lot of non-descript pin-ups. However, I believe this is another DSM symptom. You don't need to "sell" the covers anymore. Why bother? Fans can read about the story in Previews.

It's really a shame to think about the actual artistic elements of comics that we lost when we lost the newstands.

 

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 3:07pm | IP Logged | 11  

Reeves face "was" Superman, a definite plus. His height was another huge advantage. No one is of the heroic "X" heads high proportions of the greek heroic ideal, but his height did help tremendously. Him bulking up for the movie helped too, and yet he wasn't muscle-bound, which is a Superman I actually prefer. Not a Flash physique, but not the huge bruiser that the Goldenage Superman more closely resembled.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Arc Carlton
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: Peru
Posts: 3493
Posted: 29 June 2009 at 3:15pm | IP Logged | 12  

According to comicbookdb.com he wrote NEW X-MEN from #114 to 154, so about 40 issues.

______________________

All that and an annual too that was released right after NEW X-MEN #117 or 118.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 69 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login