Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 33 Next >>
Topic: All Star Batman and Robin #10 Trouble (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Francesco Vanagolli
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 3130
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 1:07am | IP Logged | 1  

John Byrne:

 QUOTE:
Call it Tinkerbell Syndrome. When you stop believing in them, they die.

[OT] When I firts read this post, my first thought was "Just like in 'Peter Pan'!". Then, I remembered that Tinkerbell IS from "Peter Pan"...!

End OT.

ASB, which, as told before, I like (I, 25 years old), is what I was afraid to see in comics when I started again to read them when I was 12.

My last superheroes comic book was an issue of IRON MAN in 1989 (American release: 1987), when I was 6. Good issue, but it bored me a bit: it was a sort of parody of the usual superheroe acts, like saving men from a fire, or cats on a tree. There wasn't real action, though. So, I gave it to my neighbor's son, who was older than me (junior higher, I think) and never got a Marvel comic in years. I spent the following 6 years without superheroes, until the X-Men animated shows arrived in Italy. I was so hooked by those characters that I wanted to give Marvel Universe a try. But I was... er... afraid. I was afraid that those comics weren't for me (12 tears old), but for adult readers. If the major event in those years was the death of Superman (!!!), who knows how the rest could be. Used to read Disney, I didn't like certain aggressive drawing styles (and the X-Men titles were all drawn that way), the "event stories"...
When I decided at last to get something (DR. STRANGE), I learned how my fears were exaggerated. Surely comics were different from those I remembered, but they could still gift a good dose of adventure, humour and action to me.

With an exception: DAREDEVIL. I liked the character after having seen him on a MARVEL TEAM UP issue, so I picked up his comic when the "Fall from the grace" saga started. Big, big error from mine. I expected to see Daredevil in action, but no way, he was too busy to talk (in 2 or 3 pages). The rest was uncomprehensible story with vulgarities and violence and strange artworks. Chichester and McDaniel drove me away from DD after one single issue! But, I repeat this, it was an exception.

Unfortunately, when the Quesada reing began, almost every Marvel comic i bought was like that. Comics ashamed to be comics, made by authors ashamed to do comics for an audience ashamed to read comics.

And now, ALL-STAR BATMAN... reminds to me those days, even if I like it. I'm enough old to appreciate it and, I think!, enough mature to consider it something completely unrelated with the REAL Batman. This is another stuff. Another Batman. Funny, in its own way, but not the Batman I want. If I still were that 12 years old, I'd hate it.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Andy Mokler
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2799
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 1:10am | IP Logged | 2  

Without getting into the quality or validity of the story itself, it seems to me that Miller is going for shock value with all of the cussing.  If that's the case, wouldn't it have more of an impact if not EVERY character in the book was doing it?

I'm very much reminded of Flight Into Fear by Will Murray(as Kenneth Robeson).  To celebrate Doc Savage's anniversary, Murray had been taking unfinished plots by Lester Dent and completing them as best and close as possible to how Dent might have actually done them.  In this particular case though, Murray took one of Dent's later cold war era spy plots and tried to morph it into a Doc Savage story.  It was truly awful and immediately didn't feel like reading a Doc Savage story. 

Is there any rumor or word that Miller has just re-worked something else(of his own or otherwise)for this Batman story?  That's sure what it feels like to me. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134706
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 3:41am | IP Logged | 3  

Is there any rumor or word that Miller has just re-worked something else(of
his own or otherwise)for this Batman story? That's sure what it feels like to
me.

••

Is this possibly an inversion -- o so common on the InterWeb -- of Frank's
recent decision to turn HOLY TERROR, BATMAN into something else, since
he has decided it does not work as a Batman story?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Carmen Bernardo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3666
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 4:12am | IP Logged | 4  

   That was his decision?  I thought it was an editorial decision.  You'd think that knocking the heads of foreign terrorists would be the Batman's specialty.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Leigh DJ Hunt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 February 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1570
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:18am | IP Logged | 5  

Not a Batman fan or a fan of censorship usually but this has even me shaking my head in disbelief. Frank Miller, his co-workers, the editor - all thought putting those words into a Batman comic and then 'covering' them was a good thing to do. I've even grown so tired of seeing the fake swearing recently in things like Spider-Man but this...this..is just an awful step for comics to have taken.

Speaking to my LCS, they didn't get any copies. Diamond UK destroyed their copies as they were asked without distributing any over here, apparently.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134706
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:28am | IP Logged | 6  

An important distinction needs to be made here. Editorial Policy is not "censorship". If SuperDuper Comics says "Captain Fonebone is an All-Ages character, and there are therefore certain kinds of stories that are not appropriate in his book," this is not "censorship". Censorship (aside from really being something only governments can do) is after the fact.

The problem here is not "censorship", but an appalling lack of any kind of cohesive editorial vision. And that's from the top, all the way down.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18183
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:41am | IP Logged | 7  

Well, it's hit USA Today: http://blogs.usatoday.com/entertainment/2008/09/dc-comics-as ks.html?csp=34
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134706
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:52am | IP Logged | 8  

… it's hit USA Today

••

With a Neal Adams Batman illustrating the article. sigh




FAKE MILESTONE: 49094
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thorsten Brochhaus
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 August 2004
Posts: 328
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:59am | IP Logged | 9  

I told the story to my girlfriend and she asked me why they put the words on the paper in the first place. I answered that I was asking this to myself and Miller said something like "to ensure that the censorbars are the right lenght". She said "That's not what I meant. Why use the words at all if you know the have to be censored".

I had no (real) answer for this. Thinking about it, it's just stupid.*



*(Nothing wrong with using profainty in a comicbook. One that is for Mature Readers and has something on the cover to make this obvious. Especially if it is a comicbook about a classic superhero).
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 6:19am | IP Logged | 10  

Re: The USA TODAY piece:

Thankfully, no "Holy Shit, Batman!" or "Bam! Pow! #(%&#@!" kind of headline.
And the "Caped Cuss-ader" line was worth a snicker.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Gerry Turnbull
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 8766
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 6:22am | IP Logged | 11  

the New york Post on the other hand . .

"Holy $#!+, Batman! "

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09122008/news/nationalnews/the_c aped_cuss_ader_128742.htm?loc=interstitialskip

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Brian Talley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5123
Posted: 15 September 2008 at 6:30am | IP Logged | 12  

Comment on the NY Post article....

Dale, that's ridiculous! Comics sales numbers are dismal compared to decades past! The only reason comics are still being sold it to retain possible licensing/movie rights! Movies saved comics, not marketing, and not some fictitious notion of "maturing".
Comic books are loss leaders! The reason they do not sell is because they are next to impossible to find! It's not easy to find and follow comics anymore, so many readers have simply given up. Today's top comics sell about 150k a month. In 1980, a comic book that sold 150k a month was put on the chopping block.
If you are a new reader to comics and manage to find a comics shop in your neighborhood, it's near impossible to pick up and follow a random title without it being tied to some ridiculous continuity or multi-title event. Comics are marketed and written largely for continuity craving fanboys who got hooked in the 80s - early 90s. No one else, children or otherwise.

Sounds like someone knows a bit about the business...

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 33 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login