Posted: 31 December 2007 at 6:32pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
The very first Spider-Man comic I ever read dealt heavily with he and Mary Jane's married life so, to me, the character is as inseperable from his marriage as Mr. Fantastic or the Elongated Man. When I was eight, or twelve, or fifteen years old I didn't want to so much want to wholly identify with Peter Parker's problems as I wanted to overcome those relatable obstacles so as to acheive a semblance of normalcy and happiness, as he had done. Most of my friends, growing up, gravitated towards or developed a fondness for Spider-Man solely because he had overcome the types of problems typical to us and our age group to find happiness in the types of successful marriages and careers that we ourselves wanted. So, having read the reviews and the mediocre build-up to OMD's final part, I found myself dreading it.
That said, I don't think it's nearly as bad of a story as the Henny Penny's on the internet are billing it as. The dilemma is an interesting one: would you give up the greatest thing in your life to fix your worst mistake. The problem is, the dilemma is not a dilemma that fits the character (a character who admittedly has made a costume from an alien, met the judeo-Christian gods and fought alongside the Greek and Norse pantheons, and traveled back and forth in time on multiple occassions, so to say that this story doesn't suit the character is saying quite a bit!). There are problems in the scripting like:
SPOILERS
A.) Peter Parker coming home to find Mary Jane, nonplused, over the revelation that not only does the devil exist (confirming that the judeo-christian religion MUST be the one true one) but that he's in their living room trying to make a bargain.
B.) Or Mary Jane's baffling final dialogue to her disappearing husband : "Face it Tiger, you just hit the jackpot." What jackpot is it when your marriage (which has apparently been blessed and consecrated by God) is magically annulled?
C.) The notion that this is the issue of Spider-Man which will make the character more relatable to the young, future generation of readers, yet it involves the title character and his wife making a deal with The Prince of Lies/Darkness/Evil and the character, a paragon of virtue and good will, even being restrained by his wife when he attempts to strike this absolute embodiment of all that is unholy.
And there's even more head-scratching continuity problems that may or may not be explained, down the road (Mephisto himself notes that it's not really important how reality is reshaped, just that it reshapes).
Those problems are whether or not Harry's return deleted his marriage with Liz Allen, thus making Spider-Man's "bargain" kill their child at the expense of the title webslinger's clear conscious.
And, my favorite, if Spider-Man's consuming love for his wife which allowed him to escape a coffin Kraven imprisioned him, means that the character is really mouldering away under the Earth.
SPOILERS OFF
But, despite those problems (and many of them are huge, glaring, clumsy problems), JMS hit some nice emotional beats, always portrayed the marriage positively (although having it to decreed by God raises the question of HOW Mephisto was able to reverse it, the morality of the couple in defying God's will, and is, ultimately, a little too melodramatic), and leaves the future writers' with plenty of ways to seamlessly reverse he and Joe Q's decision.
I'm not happy with the new status quo, but I think that everybody needs to recognize that they will always have the option of leaving the book and reading and rereading their favorite ears: married or single Peter Parker. To feel any sense of entitlement or possession of a character is as silly and stupid as feeling a sense of ownership over Kentucky Fried Chicken or Coca-Cola's secret recipes. At the end of the day, I'm still happy that there exists probably close to a thousand comics about a fictional marriage that I liked and, as I always have had the option to do, can drop the book at my own leisure so as to buy those back issues.
|