Author |
|
Glenn Greenberg Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6746
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:22am | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
<<<Certainly reads like it to me.>>>
Then you should really read it more carefully.
There's a BIG difference between "it COULD be argued that the goal of the
story COULD HAVE BEEN," which is what I wrote, and "we think JMS was
intending..."
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Bruce Buchanan Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 14 June 2006 Location: United States Posts: 4797
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:27am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
What's the argument for saying the Green Goblin (Norman) should have stayed dead? Just curious.
************
Joe, I'll give my opinion, although others may have different reasons:
Once Norman Osborn murdered Gwen Stacy, he crossed a line and had to be written out of the series. I'm not sure the readers would have accepted him - he was too evil at that point.
Plus, from a storyline standpoint, Peter never would have been able to move on to Mary Jane if Gwen's killer had been at large.
His death also had tremendous meaning. Spider-Man initially wanted to kill him, but didn't because he realized that would make him no better than the Goblin. When the Goblin dies accidentally, Spider-Man realizes that vengeance is hollow and Norman's death won't bring Gwen back.
Plus, with Harry's descent into madness, we had a natural follow-up story (which also proved to be a classic). And Stern kept the Goblin legacy alive with the Hobgoblin, so there really wasn't any need to bring Osborn back.
Edited by Bruce Buchanan on 25 September 2007 at 9:29am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
Brad Danson Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1440
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:29am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
Oh, I see...it COULD be argued...but you WEREN'T going to do it. You just wanted to bring it up. Makes a lot of sense.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Brad Brickley Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 29 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 8290
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:36am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
I think Matt had the right argument for Gwen, just stop writing about her. The only reason I even know about her is that people kept writing about her. She was a fixture before I really got into Spider-Man, I wouldn't have known different if she'd stay out of the picture.
I think the basic problem is that Spider-Man has gotten so far from where he should be. I mean he's like 30 years old, married to a Super Model, works as a teacher and who knows what else because I stopped reading or even looking at them. One of the reasons I read Ultimate Spider-Man, even though I think the arcs can drag on a bit and most of the stories seem derivative, is that he hasn't really aged, is still in High School, still has plenty of problems and seems more like Spider-Man I remember than the current MU one. I'm not sure what can really be done by Marvel, too many anal fanboys out there to do anything too radical (Just look at the "What color is Spider-Man's Costume" Thread), I still think JB's idea of just move on and forget is the best.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Martin Redmond Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 27 June 2006 Posts: 3882
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:36am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
QUOTE:
Doctor Octopus was killed by Kaine, then resurrected by the Hand |
|
|
... Why would the Hand give a fig about Dr Octopus?
Norman should've stayed as dead as Gwen is. Or else bring her back. I'd rather read about Gwen mind games on Peter than Norman playing mind games on Peter yet again. Isn't more natural to want that instead?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Larry Morris Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 15 July 2007 Location: United States Posts: 622
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:36am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
<<Sure he saw it...but like I said previously...Gwen was perfect. Flawless. Long time readers weren't going to forget about her. Look at how much passion you have right now for a character that has been dead 30 years. Something is not right about that. I *think* JMS was trying to tear her down so that eventually long-time readers would quit clamoring for a new Gwen reference.>>
WHO was clamoring for them? And clearly I haven't fogotten about her. I wasn't going to forget about her whether this story was told or not. All he did was leave such a bad taste in longtime readers' mouths that some of them dropped the Spider-Man books. BTW, I wasn't one of them, probably because Gwen has been dead or over 30 years..
I was never advocating bringing Gwen back or continual Gwen references, but I don't think we ever had either. Unlike many on this forum, I like the marriage. This isn't about my liking Gwen more than MJ, it's about the integrity of the characters.
<<I can't make that point anymore clear. If you don't agree, fine. Move along.>>
I'll move along when I feel like moving along. If you can't handle your opinions beng contested then don't post them on a public message forum.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mike Bunge Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 10 June 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1335
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:38am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
"Once Norman Osborn murdered Gwen Stacy, he crossed a line and had to be written out of the series. I'm not sure the readers would have accepted him - he was too evil at that point.
Plus, from a storyline standpoint, Peter never would have been able to move on to Mary Jane if Gwen's killer had been at large."
In that sense, the Goblin's death served to reinforce the internal logic or reality of the Marvel Universe. As opposed to what DC has done with the Joker or multiple Robins.
Mike
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Donald Miller Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 03 February 2005 Location: United States Posts: 3601
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:40am | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Change his costume back to black and red...everything else just falls in line.
D-
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
Brad Danson Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1440
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:43am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
QUOTE:
WHO was clamoring for them? |
|
|
Somebody...because she kept coming up. Might have been the fanboy writers.
QUOTE:
And clearly I haven't fogotten about her. |
|
|
That would mean the story failed for you...like I said it did for most.
QUOTE:
Unlike many on this forum, I like the marriage. This isn't about my
liking Gwen more than MJ, it's about the integrity of the characters. |
|
|
And I think the integrity of the character is having him be single.
QUOTE:
If you can't handle your opinions beng contested then don't post them on a public message forum. |
|
|
Its your inability to get my point that is bugging me. Twice you have said "it didn't make me forget about her!" when my whole point was that the attempt didn't work.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Taavi Suhonen Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 27 April 2004 Location: Finland Posts: 1544
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:45am | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Glenn Greenberg wrote:
<<<Doc Sampson>>>
Why do people keep making this typo? |
|
|
Maybe it's because of that issue of What The? that had Doc Samson/Homer
Simpson fusion called Doc Simpson. But yeah, it gets on my nerves too.
Stephen Robinson wrote:
I think Aunt May's death is the same way. That should have been the
Marvel version of an "imaginary story" (a "What If") and that wouldn't
"cheapen" the story -- any more than THE DEATH OF SUPERMAN is cheapened. |
|
|
I agree. I like Amazing Spider-Man #400 and its later followup story*, but it should have been done out of continuity.
*Judas Traveller says he can bring Aunt May back to life, but it has a
price - the lives of a thousand people randomly selected. Spidey turns
him down, Judas drops the price first to a hundred and finally to
"just" one with a promise it will be someone "worthless" (a bum, a
criminal). While most of us would be able to turn Judas down when it
was a matter of several lives, I think many would take his final offer.
But Spider-Man turns him down, because he is a hero.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Glenn Greenberg Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6746
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:47am | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
<<<Oh, I see...it COULD be argued...but you WEREN'T going to do it. You
just wanted to bring it up. Makes a lot of sense.>>>
Are you being dense just for kicks, or are you really having a problem with
reading comprehension?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Brad Danson Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1440
|
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 9:53am | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
I'm just not being an anal ass.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|