Posted: 12 April 2006 at 12:54pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
(1) You come from screen writing, and think writing comics is just the same.
Do they actually think that? I know script writer Heinburg on the Young Avengers is writing a good comic. What ever technique he is using is working for me.
(2) You think the civilian guise is much more interesting than the superhero.
The maximum I can enjoy as a reader is a 60/40 split. I don't mind civilian story arcs at all but they must not take over the Superhero side of a comic.
(3) You think having superheroes say "fuck" is "sophisticated".
I agree that swearing does not equel mature if anything it means the opposite.
(4) You think being assigned to a long established title is an automatic mandate to blow everything up and start over.
Depends I guess if that is what you have been brought on to the title to do. It rarely works for the benifit of the title in my opinion though.
(5) You think the characters should serve your stories, not the other way 'round.
I think this is forgivable once in a while. Some people like Chuck Dixon did start to make a habit of it though.
(6) You think Batman is "crazy".
That became lazy thinking after about 1990
(7) You think Superman is a "boy scout".
Ditto
(8) You use the characters and stories as therapy.
I have never noitced this
(9) You pepper your stories with "jokes" (usually at the expense of the characters) to amuse your fanboy friends.
This usually fails to amuse me
(10) You've "always" thought superheroes were stupid (and have often said so), but they sell better than your own comics, so you're in it for the money.
This is something I do hate. Although some people who are not keen on superheroes (not haters though) have turned out great work. John Buscema as an artist for one and Steve Gerber as a writer.
|