Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 76 Next >>
Topic: Title Change: Spider-Man Thread (Now with New Costume) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Taavi Suhonen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 April 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1544
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:11am | IP Logged | 1  

There's really no other way to end a marriage.
********************************************************** ***

Well, the third option that exists in superhero comics is altering the reality so that the marriage has never been.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35927
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:12am | IP Logged | 2  

You do know we're talking comic books here, right Thomas?  In a world of CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS, HOUSE OF M, time travel, cosmic cubes and reboots, there are any of a number of ways to nullify the marriage without killing anyone off or making Peter a divorcée.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew Bitner
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7526
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:15am | IP Logged | 3  

I'm with Matt. Death and divorce are limited, inside-the-box examples of real world thinking. In the MU, virtually anything is possible-- they have myriad ways of hitting the 'reset' button. Would the fans accept a return to "classic" Spider-Man? Who knows? But frankly, the character is so far removed from the troubled kid I liked way-back-when that I have (and continue to have) no interest in reading about the current version of Spider-Man.

(And darn it, I am now one post past my birth year. Shoot.)



Edited by Andrew Bitner on 05 January 2006 at 11:16am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:30am | IP Logged | 4  

And while the sales of everything have fallen, Spider-Man has fallen harder than most.  According to THE STANDARD CATALOG OF COMIC BOOKS, an early 1980s issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN sold about 50 thousand more copies a month than DETECTIVE COMICS and BATMAN combined. 

****

or "psycho ninja" Batman has increased, relstive to the rest of the comic population.

It's a false analysis to compare Spider-man to one character, say Batman, and use it asd proof of anything. It may be to the (remaining) audience, Batman is just that damn good (not to me but).

Heck, post-Crisis, post Dark Knight Returns, post 5 movies, Batman was going to increase.

and you can't compare Spider-man to himself, because everything has fallen.

You'd have to somehow compare the average fall for Marvel comics, and then compare that to the fall in Spider-man comics and see if he fell further.

and even then you couldn't necessarily ascribe that to the marriage-it may be any number of things besides that-change of taste in the audience, clone saga fallout never recovered, etc.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Roger A Ott II
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5371
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:35am | IP Logged | 5  

I still like the ol' Shaper Of Worlds idea that JB (I think it was him) proposed some time ago.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:38am | IP Logged | 6  

In the MU, virtually anything is possible-- they have myriad ways of hitting the 'reset' button.

***

Historically, Marvel Fans seem more loathe to accept reboots and resets which lead to negating history. (Mark Gruenwald's memorable "Marvel should never need a Crisis on Infinite Earths")   Which is why explanations for things have become increasingly complicated for Marvel.  The Ultimate universe it its own thing, but any wholesale "the marriage never happened" I think would be rejected. Of course things have changed.

Judging by the debate, while MJ remains popular, the issue divides many Spider fans.  However, I would guess the marriage is more palatable to people since they dropped "MJ is a stupid whiner" the last few years. One of the few things I have totally enjoyed about JMS's stories is the way he writes the marriage and MJ.

IIRC, it has been reported that Stan Lee asked for the marriage to coincide with the Spider-man newspaper strip.

Personally, the end of the marriage may be the thing that would make me drop Spider-man, a tough decision for me. I have put up with a lot over the years.  I personally would reject any "Spider-man wakes up and is 16 again." I want the comics I have read to have mattered-not so much as chains dragging the character down, but as events that happened to the character

My personal feeling is that Spider-man isn't broken or an outdated character. and rather than new powers, or a change in status quo, or Spider-totem stuff, all he needs are solid stories-interesting, engaging, and fun.

There were plenty of bad stories before, of course, but with everything a six issue arch these days, more or less, it is harder to move away from a bad story.

I like what Peter David has said, and look forward to trying his post Other-stories.



Edited by Rob Hewitt on 05 January 2006 at 11:39am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Victor Manuel Fernandez Patiño
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 1602
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:41am | IP Logged | 7  

You do know we're talking comic books here, right Thomas? In a world of
CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS, HOUSE OF M, time travel, cosmic cubes and
reboots, there are any of a number of ways to nullify the marriage without
killing anyone off or making Peter a divorcée.
************************************************************ ***************

Bingo!!

Surely many fans would cry that that kind of stories lacks of realism... But to
hell with them! Bring back Spider-Man!! Well... Bring back the whole Marvel
Universe!!!!
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Victor Manuel Fernandez Patiño
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 1602
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 11:45am | IP Logged | 8  

(Mark Gruenwald's memorable "Marvel should never need a Crisis on Infinite
Earths")

************************************************************ ****************

Easy for him... he never had to endure Quesada tenure as EIC at ^^*****
(Formely know as Marvel)!!!
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Mike Bunge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1335
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 12:39pm | IP Logged | 9  

"or "psycho ninja" Batman has increased, relstive to the rest of the comic population.

It's a false analysis to compare Spider-man to one character, say Batman, and use it asd proof of anything. It may be to the (remaining) audience, Batman is just that damn good (not to me but).

Heck, post-Crisis, post Dark Knight Returns, post 5 movies, Batman was going to increase.

and you can't compare Spider-man to himself, because everything has fallen.

You'd have to somehow compare the average fall for Marvel comics, and then compare that to the fall in Spider-man comics and see if he fell further.

and even then you couldn't necessarily ascribe that to the marriage-it may be any number of things besides that-change of taste in the audience, clone saga fallout never recovered, etc."

 

I wasn't trying to claim that the marriage led to any decline in Spider-sales, only to point out that you really can't defend the marriage or fans' opinion of it by claiming Spider-sales have been relatively stable.  Sales have not been stable, but that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the marriage.

And it's not invalid to compare sales of one book to another over a period of time.  The conclusions you draw may be invalid, but not the principle of comparison.

Mike

Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew W. Farago
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4079
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 12:47pm | IP Logged | 10  

Mike Bunge: Uh, 20 years takes us back to 1986. 
Sales on AMAZING SPIDER-MAN were at least about
3 times higher than they are today, and there were
multiple Spider-books then so you can't argue that
the audience is just more spread out now.  And
while the sales of everything have fallen, Spider-Man
has fallen harder than most.  According to THE
STANDARD CATALOG OF COMIC BOOKS, an early
1980s issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN sold about
50 thousand more copies a month than DETECTIVE
COMICS and BATMAN combined.  Spider-Man
(much like the X-Franchise) has lost that fanbase
that used to clearly elevate it from other books.


The Batman titles started selling a lot better once
Dark Knight was published, then got another boost
from the national media attention of Death in the
Family, and then got a giant push with the 1989
Batman movie, so I'd say that's more a case of
Batman gaining in popularity than Spider-Man
nose-diving.

Relative to the rest of the Marvel line, I'm sure
Spider-Man's still the top-selling solo character
they've got, but there are only so many readers left...
I think the fact that we never got "the next Todd
McFarlane" on a Spider-Man book got rid of a chunk
of readers in the early 1990s, the Clone Saga got rid
of another chunk after that, and when those readers
didn't come back, sales didn't bounce back to their
previous standard levels.

Roger A Ott II: So, are you saying that the reason
Spider-Man titles have done well in the past 20 years
is because he was married?  Preposterous, I say. 
I'd be willing to wager that sales would be just as
good or possibly better if Mary Jane had stuck with
the original "No!' she exclaimed when Peter
proposed.


I didn't say that the marriage helped sell books,
actually. However, I do think it's pretty low on the list
of what drove people away from the Spider-Man
books. It's more a non-factor than a negative one for
most fans, I'd bet. Kids don't seem to mind that he's
married, and if the stories are enjoyable, most adults
don't seem to mind one way or the other, either.

It's bad stories that have killed people's interest in
Spider-Man more than anything else. Knocking up
Gwen Stacy's corpse, letting everyone in the Marvel
Universe in on Spider-Man's secret identity, maiming
and killing Spider-Man to establish a "shocking new
direction!", assigning gritty artists like Mike Deodato
to draw what should be a fun, light-hearted book,
making Peter Parker and all of his supporting cast
into miserable, whiny creeps, getting rid of the Daily
Bugle and the rest of that great supporting cast that
Lee, Ditko and Romita created way back when...the
marriage doesn't even come close to making the top
ten (or top twenty) list of reasons that I gave up on
the Spider-Man books a couple of years ago.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Glenn Greenberg
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6746
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 1:39pm | IP Logged | 11  

<<I think Peter married to a Mary Jane who is a struggling actress/model
can work, but they decided to make her a supermodel and then a soap
opera star right about the same time the marriage happened. That's the
part that didn't ring true to me.>>


That's how I felt too. I didn't really mind the marriage when it happened,
but I didn't care for how it was portrayed in the months and years that
followed. They never seemed like a real married couple to me, and they
CERTAINLY didn't seem like Peter Parker and Mary Jane Watson placed in
a marital situation.

I also didn't like Mary Jane as a supermodel and successful TV actress. I
thought JMS was on the right track when he decided to make her a
struggling theater actress.

My feeling for a long time was that if the marriage was going to remain
status quo, it certainly COULD work, as long as it was written well.
Unfortunately, most--not all, but most--of the writers who worked on
Spider-Man after the wedding did not handle the marriage particularly
well.

I still think JMS has handled Peter and MJ well as a married couple--in
some areas, he's probably handled them the best. It's all the other stuff
he's done with the series that drove me away.




Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Mets
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 898
Posted: 05 January 2006 at 1:40pm | IP Logged | 12  

I'm with Matt. Death and divorce are limited, inside-the-box examples of real world thinking. In the MU, virtually anything is possible-- they have myriad ways of hitting the 'reset' button. Would the fans accept a return to "classic" Spider-Man? Who knows? But frankly, the character is so far removed from the troubled kid I liked way-back-when that I have (and continue to have) no interest in reading about the current version of Spider-Man.

********************************************************** *
Has the Marvel Universe ever hit the reset button? The best example someone cited here was how Johnny Storm's marriage with Alicia was retconned with the reveal she was a Skrull, but
A) Johnny as not as important a character to the Marvel Universe as Spider-Man.
B) Spider-Man's marriage has been the status quo since 1987, so anyone who's started reading Spider-Man since then was familiar with it
C) Classic stories (the ones that'll be readily available in reprint form decades from now) in which Spider-Man's been married. Kraven's Last Hunt. The Todd Mcfarlane Venom stories. Mark Millar's run. The best Stracynci issues.
D) Can anyone name stories of the same caliber in which Johnny Storm was married.


And while the sales of everything have fallen, Spider-Man has fallen harder than most.  According to THE STANDARD CATALOG OF COMIC BOOKS, an early 1980s issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN sold about 50 thousand more copies a month than DETECTIVE COMICS and BATMAN combined.
********************************************************** *****
That had more to do with sales on the Batman books being outrageously low than sales of the Spider-Man books being high.



I didn't say that the marriage helped sell books,
actually. However, I do think it's pretty low on the list
of what drove people away from the Spider-Man
books. It's more a non-factor than a negative one for
most fans, I'd bet. Kids don't seem to mind that he's
married, and if the stories are enjoyable, most adults
don't seem to mind one way or the other, either.

It's bad stories that have killed people's interest in
Spider-Man more than anything else. Knocking up
Gwen Stacy's corpse, letting everyone in the Marvel
Universe in on Spider-Man's secret identity, maiming
and killing Spider-Man to establish a "shocking new
direction!", assigning gritty artists like Mike Deodato
to draw what should be a fun, light-hearted book,
making Peter Parker and all of his supporting cast
into miserable, whiny creeps, getting rid of the Daily
Bugle and the rest of that great supporting cast that
Lee, Ditko and Romita created way back when...the
marriage doesn't even come close to making the top
ten (or top twenty) list of reasons that I gave up on
the Spider-Man books a couple of years ago.

********************************************************** *****
While I agree the married/ single status is a nonfactor for most readers, and bad stories are the biggest factor, I believe the Clone Saga/ relaunch were better examples of bad stories that drove readers away than anything JMS has done, especially if you look at the sales.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 76 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login