| Posted: 11 December 2005 at 11:21am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
I've done some seriously violent scenes myself -- the Demon biting a guy's whole face off, for instance! -- and in the end it comes down to one thing: does the scene serve the story that is being told, or does the story being told exist only to make the scene possible? In the case of the Spider-Man scene, it "feels" like the latter, but since my mind-reading powers have faded with age, I cannot saw with any certainty.
****************************
I've read the issue in question (though, "read" is a rather generous term to use given the story quality), as I strongly believe it's the latter. I'd even argue that you could come to that conclusion *without* having read the issue -- with no mind-reading possible -- because Quesada hyped the whole "Spider-Man will lose an organ" thing as a major selling point of this series.
Now, let's put aside the appropriateness of the eye-gouging and cannibalism, let's just discuss how it works as a story. As bad as the final season of Buffy was, when something similar happened to a character, we were not treated to cannibalism and the injury was permanent and something that symbolized the tremendous loss Buffy had suffered. In other words, it mattered.
Spider-Man's brutal beating does not really matter to the story. For one, he's DYING ANYWAY. Now, one can argue that it's less entertaining to have him keel over from some unknown illness and then be reborn. Fine. But the loss of organ means nothing -- we don't see him dealing with the loss and we never will. He will most likely have the eye when he's "reborn." So, this screams sensationalism to me.
And was it even in character for Morlun to do this? I'd argue no based on his previous appearance. Even if because he was defeated before, he wanted to humiliate and destroy Peter, that seems mostly pointless since his goal is to not have him live with that defeat. He plans on "consuming" him. Thus, an issue-long ass-whipping is extremely self-indulgent. It's like my throwing a pig around the room, beating the crap out of him, and then yanking out his eye before making sausage out of him. It's a bit extreme.
If Morlun is basically Kraven the Hunter with a vampiric angle, no one has explained to me why he doesn't just shoot him with a high-powered rifle and then get down to business. In other words, this character's actions are intended to serve the story without any grounding in logic. Why not just suck the lifeforce from him while he's yelling with pain after you've yanked out his eye? Why then proceed to pound him into the pavement? It's all so excessive.
Also, I think there's sort of an unwritten rule that characters can be beaten up and while they might "realistically" look like what Peter did in FNSM #3, they generally will just have a fat lip and a black eye. In other words, it doesn't get that grotesque. I point to when Lana Lang was tortured off camera in Superman #2 or Robin is beaten with a crowbar in Batman #427 or when Batman is beaten nearly to death by Bane in Batman #497 (as bad as that issue was, it didn't sink to the ASM #527 levels).
This is just part of the evidence that makes me think that this storyline so far was all about sensationalism at the expense of an actual story.
|