Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 50 Next >>
Topic: Amazing Spider-Man now with spoilers (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 10:29am | IP Logged | 1  

If it had occurred in a movie, it would be a very intense scene-probably almost unwatchable for me.

However, it doesn't have the same impact on the comic page. for me.

The last image I think drives home the point-that he has just taking the worst beating of his life and there is no way to stop Morlun.  I think, in the context of the story, it was needed to show what they wanted to show.

Evolve or Die.

As fro Kraven's last Hunt, it was one of the very first Spider-men stories I had read.  I was 9 or 10.  I really thought Kraven was a scary and tough villain. Little did I know when I would read his earlier appearances that he was not quite the handful he was in that story.

Looking back, I came in at a violent time for Spidey-The Gang War was just rapping up and then he would be buried alive by Kraven and then was it Ann Nocenti who sent him into a pscho ward in the Mad Dog storyline? Lots of guns and stuff. They were pretty intense

Getting comics at the flea market and newstand, never did see how Gang War ended.  I'm not even sure these were all brand new at the time, but these are the comics I read first

I can't believe I thought he might be dead at the end of that Magma storyline



Edited by Rob Hewitt on 11 December 2005 at 10:30am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 135410
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 10:30am | IP Logged | 2  

Geeeeeeez, Joe, you are pushing me awful close to defending this thing!

There is a fine line between realism and voyeurism in these kinds of stories and scenes, and often it is the viewer, not the artist or writer, who crosses that line. Refelect on something Harvey Kurtzman had a character say in an episode of "Little Annie Fannie" -- "If people have dirty minds, you could wear a trenchcoat and they'd see ankles and think dirty."

I've done some seriously violent scenes myself -- the Demon biting a guy's whole face off, for instance! -- and in the end it comes down to one thing: does the scene serve the story that is being told, or does the story being told exist only to make the scene possible? In the case of the Spider-Man scene, it "feels" like the latter, but since my mind-reading powers have faded with age, I cannot saw with any certainty.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12843
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 10:55am | IP Logged | 3  

You're right again. The voyeurism that I observe is a quality of the writer or reader of that scene. If Morlun was shown standing over Spider-Man gloating, that would be a different matter. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Stephen Robinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5833
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 11:21am | IP Logged | 4  

I've done some seriously violent scenes myself -- the Demon biting a guy's whole face off, for instance! -- and in the end it comes down to one thing: does the scene serve the story that is being told, or does the story being told exist only to make the scene possible? In the case of the Spider-Man scene, it "feels" like the latter, but since my mind-reading powers have faded with age, I cannot saw with any certainty.

****************************

I've read the issue in question (though, "read" is a rather generous term to use given the story quality), as I strongly believe it's the latter. I'd even argue that you could come to that conclusion *without* having read the issue -- with no mind-reading possible -- because Quesada hyped the whole "Spider-Man will lose an organ" thing as a major selling point of this series.

Now, let's put aside the appropriateness of the eye-gouging and cannibalism, let's just discuss how it works as a story. As bad as the final season of Buffy was, when something similar happened to a character, we were not treated to cannibalism and the injury was permanent and something that symbolized the tremendous loss Buffy had suffered. In other words, it mattered.

Spider-Man's brutal beating does not really matter to the story. For one, he's DYING ANYWAY. Now, one can argue that it's less entertaining to have him keel over from some unknown illness and then be reborn. Fine. But the loss of organ means nothing -- we don't see him dealing with the loss and we never will. He will most likely have the eye when he's "reborn." So, this screams sensationalism to me.

And was it even in character for Morlun to do this? I'd argue no based on his previous appearance. Even if because he was defeated before, he wanted to humiliate and destroy Peter, that seems mostly pointless since his goal is to not have him live with that defeat. He plans on "consuming" him. Thus, an issue-long ass-whipping is extremely self-indulgent. It's like my throwing a pig around the room, beating the crap out of him, and then yanking out his eye before making sausage out of him. It's a bit extreme.

If Morlun is basically Kraven the Hunter with a vampiric angle, no one has explained to me why he doesn't just shoot him with a high-powered rifle and then get down to business. In other words, this character's actions are intended to serve the story without any grounding in logic. Why not just suck the lifeforce from him while he's yelling with pain after you've yanked out his eye? Why then proceed to pound him into the pavement? It's all so excessive.

Also, I think there's sort of an unwritten rule that characters can be beaten up and while they might "realistically" look like what Peter did in FNSM #3, they generally will just have a fat lip and a black eye. In other words, it doesn't get that grotesque. I point to when Lana Lang was tortured off camera in Superman #2 or Robin is beaten with a crowbar in Batman #427 or when Batman is beaten nearly to death by Bane in Batman #497 (as bad as that issue was, it didn't sink to the ASM #527 levels).

This is just part of the evidence that makes me think that this storyline so far was all about sensationalism at the expense of an actual story.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Steve Jones
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 548
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 11:22am | IP Logged | 5  

Matt, I hope you are now recovered from your shocking experience that, heaven forfend, someone actually likes the Other. Just comfort yourself with the knowledge that I obviously don't get Spider-man.

Joe, the last scene was shocking and brutal. Voyeuristic? I don't know. I didn't feel like a voyeur. Strangely, in the unpublished Man XL 3, that I wrote and drew for Mondo (Britain's Greatest Fanzine) back in the mid 90's I had a scene that almost exactly duplicated this one. Maybe that's why I am okay with it.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36455
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 11:24am | IP Logged | 6  

 Steve Jones wrote:
Just comfort yourself with the knowledge that I obviously don't get Spider-man.

As with many things you tend to have a knee jerk, nearly compulsive need to be contrary about, I did this a long time ago.  Hence the sarcasm in my post above.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew W. Farago
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4075
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 1:21pm | IP Logged | 7  

Kraven's Last Hunt (one of the first Spider-Man stories I read,
and still one of my favorites) was dark, and I was legitimately
worried about Spider-Man's fate (and had no idea at the time
that character deaths weren't permanent), but the story was
scary in a ghost story sort of way as opposed to a slasher
movie approach. When Kraven shot Spider-Man, we didn't see
brains or guts spattering as bullets ripped into him, and
Kraven's suicide wasn't depicted on-panel, either. The story
made clear that Kraven had lost his mind and that Spider-Man
was a true hero, so I was able to deal with that scenario as an
11-year-old (who rushed to the drugstore every week to catch
the next installment and was relieved when Spider-Man came
out on top at the end).

What made that story stand out was that Spider-Man stories
before and after Kraven's Last Hunt were business-as-usual,
with Spider-Man cracking jokes, dealing with money problems
and super-villains and Aunt May and all of it. The Morlun story
is dark following dark with no sense that things are going to
lighten up anytime soon, either (could be wrong about that, but
we'll see). If there's one scary Spider-Man story every once in a
while, the character's still intact and you can still do fun stories
with him; if there's one light story for every three years of dark
stories, something's wrong.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Steve Jones
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 548
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 1:56pm | IP Logged | 8  

Matt, I agree I can appear to be contrary for the sake of it, which, you may not believe it, I have been trying to change as it can be annoying. But I would never read a comic and pretend to like it or not just to be contrary. I read the Other and thought it was fab and groovy. Hudlin's first two issues were so so but other than that it was fine. The debate started on this board and before I could fully participate I thought I had better read the source material. I am sure there are many here who have expressed opinions on the Other who have only read the online scans or are basing their judgement on what other people are saying, which to my eyes is stupid.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 2:28pm | IP Logged | 9  

What made that story stand out was that Spider-Man stories
before and after Kraven's Last Hunt were business-as-usual,
with Spider-Man cracking jokes, dealing with money problems
and super-villains and Aunt May and all of it.

****

As shown above, it was immediately followed by Spider-man being locked in a mental ward, as a "mad dog" unsure if he was crazy or rational, wearing a straight jacket and being mentally absued by a psychiatrist. after that things more or less returned to normal.

 



Edited by Rob Hewitt on 11 December 2005 at 2:29pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Thomas Mets
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 898
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 2:45pm | IP Logged | 10  

For the sake of comparison, how do you guys rate the KRAVEN'S LAST
HUNT story against the OTHER? I see the many similarities in both,
including some spider mumbo-jumbo.

********************************************************** *************

KRAVEN's LAST HUNT is one of my favorite Spider-Man stories ever, and if it weren't so consistently popular, I'd say it was ahead of its time. It took me years to get all of the issues, but it was more than worth it. I can't imagine what comic boards would be saying if that story came out today.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Darren De Vouge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 December 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3586
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 4:02pm | IP Logged | 11  

Steve Jones wrote:
I've just read all 7 issues of the Other and I really enjoyed all the issues.

******************************
I've stopped reading all Spider-Man titles until "THE OTHER" is "THE OVER" and things get back to normal.  If ever.



Back to Top profile | search
 
Flavio Sapha
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12912
Posted: 11 December 2005 at 5:30pm | IP Logged | 12  

Despite the subversive Sienkiewicz covers, the Ann Nocenti story is quite
tame. I was disappointed because those covers are in extreme contrast
with the very tame June Brigman (IIRC) art and the very traditional story.
Arkham Asylum was another madhouse story that didn't really deliver what
it promised, IMO.

Gang War, on the other hand was a story that simply had me sitting on the
edge of my chair for months. Unfortunately, distribution sucked where I
lived at and I couldn't read the final installments, but I got the impression it
was fizzling at the end, in no small part due to the replacement of Ron
Frenz on the art chores. True?

Edited by Flavio Sapha on 11 December 2005 at 5:33pm
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 50 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login